Measurable residual disease testing in acute myeloid leukemia: current state, foundational models, and tools for future development.

IF 8.7
Joseph Van Galen, Stephen D Willis, Ashish Bains, Sara H Small
{"title":"Measurable residual disease testing in acute myeloid leukemia: current state, foundational models, and tools for future development.","authors":"Joseph Van Galen, Stephen D Willis, Ashish Bains, Sara H Small","doi":"10.1007/s10555-026-10322-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a lethal and rapidly progressive hematologic malignancy with high rates of relapse and treatment refractoriness. Management of AML is complicated by biological heterogeneity in a disease that is broadly defined by the clonal expansion of myeloblasts that otherwise play an important role in healthy marrow tissues. While subtypes of AML are increasingly defined by druggable driver mutations including FLT3-ITD, IDH1, IDH2, and NPM1, conventional chemotherapy and reduced intensity induction regimens (e.g., azacitidine-venetoclax) remain therapeutic backbones. One area of active development for personalization of AML treatment is the assessment of measurable residual disease (MRD). MRD testing in AML is complicated by uncertainty regarding the physiologic compartment of persistent and relapsing myeloblasts, and by increasing recognition of myeloid driver mutations in some healthy bone marrow states, such as clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential (CHIP). Even in large academic centers, MRD tools are not yet universally available. Standardized workflows for MRD implementation are only beginning to enter consensus and guideline documents. Current understanding of AML biology and state-of-the-art tools for MRD measurement are reviewed here in an effort to promote clinical and laboratory investigator collaboration for the development of reliable tools for improving outcomes in this deadly disease. Clinical trial number: not applicable.</p>","PeriodicalId":520582,"journal":{"name":"Cancer metastasis reviews","volume":"45 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13031212/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer metastasis reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10555-026-10322-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a lethal and rapidly progressive hematologic malignancy with high rates of relapse and treatment refractoriness. Management of AML is complicated by biological heterogeneity in a disease that is broadly defined by the clonal expansion of myeloblasts that otherwise play an important role in healthy marrow tissues. While subtypes of AML are increasingly defined by druggable driver mutations including FLT3-ITD, IDH1, IDH2, and NPM1, conventional chemotherapy and reduced intensity induction regimens (e.g., azacitidine-venetoclax) remain therapeutic backbones. One area of active development for personalization of AML treatment is the assessment of measurable residual disease (MRD). MRD testing in AML is complicated by uncertainty regarding the physiologic compartment of persistent and relapsing myeloblasts, and by increasing recognition of myeloid driver mutations in some healthy bone marrow states, such as clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential (CHIP). Even in large academic centers, MRD tools are not yet universally available. Standardized workflows for MRD implementation are only beginning to enter consensus and guideline documents. Current understanding of AML biology and state-of-the-art tools for MRD measurement are reviewed here in an effort to promote clinical and laboratory investigator collaboration for the development of reliable tools for improving outcomes in this deadly disease. Clinical trial number: not applicable.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

急性髓系白血病可测量残留疾病检测:现状、基础模型和未来发展工具
急性髓性白血病(AML)是一种致命且进展迅速的血液系统恶性肿瘤,具有高复发率和治疗难治性。AML的治疗因其生物学异质性而变得复杂,这种疾病被广泛定义为成髓细胞的克隆扩增,而成髓细胞在健康骨髓组织中发挥重要作用。虽然AML亚型越来越多地由可药物驱动突变定义,包括FLT3-ITD, IDH1, IDH2和NPM1,但传统化疗和降低强度诱导方案(例如,阿扎胞苷-venetoclax)仍然是治疗的主要方法。AML个体化治疗的一个积极发展领域是可测量残余疾病(MRD)的评估。AML的MRD检测由于持续和复发的成髓细胞的生理室的不确定性,以及在一些健康骨髓状态(如不确定潜力的克隆造血(CHIP))中对骨髓驱动突变的识别增加而变得复杂。即使在大型学术中心,MRD工具也不是普遍可用的。MRD实现的标准化工作流程才刚刚开始进入共识和指导文件。本文回顾了目前对AML生物学的理解和最先进的MRD测量工具,以促进临床和实验室研究者的合作,开发可靠的工具来改善这种致命疾病的预后。临床试验号:不适用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书