Effect of Medicaid Audio-Only Telehealth Coverage Policy on Mental Health Visits in Federally Qualified Health Centers.

IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Khyathi Gadag, Kanika Arora, Brian Kaskie, Whitney E Zahnd
{"title":"Effect of Medicaid Audio-Only Telehealth Coverage Policy on Mental Health Visits in Federally Qualified Health Centers.","authors":"Khyathi Gadag, Kanika Arora, Brian Kaskie, Whitney E Zahnd","doi":"10.1111/1475-6773.70107","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>We examined how the expansion of Medicaid audio-only coverage (MAOC) was associated with changes in mental health visit rates at Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs).</p><p><strong>Data: </strong>We used publicly available FQHC-level Uniform Data Systems (UDS) data (N = 9606 FQHC-years) from 2016 to 2022. We used information from the Center for Connected Health Policy, Casetext, National Law Review, LegiScan, and other publicly available state telehealth laws and guidelines to map MAOC and other state-level Medicaid and telehealth policy variables.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>We employed a two-way fixed effects generalized difference-in-differences (DiD) estimator, followed by the Callaway-Sant'Anna DiD estimator, to assess the effect of MAOC on mental health visit rates in FQHCs. The outcome was defined as mental health visit rates, and the key independent variable was MAOC policy implementation. Time-varying state-level covariates, including mental health provider ratio, broadband access, Medicaid and telehealth policies, as well as FQHC-level covariates including the percentage of Medicaid-insured and low-income patients served, were included in the analysis. Subgroup analyses were conducted based on FQHC characteristics including rural/urban location and the presence of telemental health services (TMHS).</p><p><strong>Principal findings: </strong>DiD analysis showed no significant effect of MAOC on mental health visit rates across FQHCs. However, subgroup analyses revealed that FQHCs without an existing TMHS experienced a 20.5% increase in visit rates (p < 0.05), while those with a TMHS saw a 19.73% decrease (p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Audio-only telehealth appears to serve as a substitute rather than a complementary modality for in-person or video-based mental health services in FQHCs. Providing MAOC increased mental health visit rates at FQHCs without an established telemental health service, indicating improved accessibility. Given the quality concerns surrounding audio-only telehealth, further research is needed to validate this substitution effect and assess the quality of introducing these services as an option for FQHCs.</p>","PeriodicalId":55065,"journal":{"name":"Health Services Research","volume":"61 2","pages":"e70107"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13140318/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Services Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.70107","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: We examined how the expansion of Medicaid audio-only coverage (MAOC) was associated with changes in mental health visit rates at Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs).

Data: We used publicly available FQHC-level Uniform Data Systems (UDS) data (N = 9606 FQHC-years) from 2016 to 2022. We used information from the Center for Connected Health Policy, Casetext, National Law Review, LegiScan, and other publicly available state telehealth laws and guidelines to map MAOC and other state-level Medicaid and telehealth policy variables.

Study design: We employed a two-way fixed effects generalized difference-in-differences (DiD) estimator, followed by the Callaway-Sant'Anna DiD estimator, to assess the effect of MAOC on mental health visit rates in FQHCs. The outcome was defined as mental health visit rates, and the key independent variable was MAOC policy implementation. Time-varying state-level covariates, including mental health provider ratio, broadband access, Medicaid and telehealth policies, as well as FQHC-level covariates including the percentage of Medicaid-insured and low-income patients served, were included in the analysis. Subgroup analyses were conducted based on FQHC characteristics including rural/urban location and the presence of telemental health services (TMHS).

Principal findings: DiD analysis showed no significant effect of MAOC on mental health visit rates across FQHCs. However, subgroup analyses revealed that FQHCs without an existing TMHS experienced a 20.5% increase in visit rates (p < 0.05), while those with a TMHS saw a 19.73% decrease (p < 0.05).

Conclusion: Audio-only telehealth appears to serve as a substitute rather than a complementary modality for in-person or video-based mental health services in FQHCs. Providing MAOC increased mental health visit rates at FQHCs without an established telemental health service, indicating improved accessibility. Given the quality concerns surrounding audio-only telehealth, further research is needed to validate this substitution effect and assess the quality of introducing these services as an option for FQHCs.

医疗补助音频远程医疗覆盖政策对联邦合格医疗中心心理健康就诊的影响。
目的:我们研究了医疗补助纯音频覆盖(MAOC)的扩大与联邦合格医疗中心(fqhc)心理健康就诊率的变化之间的关系。数据:我们使用2016年至2022年可公开获得的fqhc级统一数据系统(UDS)数据(N = 9606 fqhc年)。我们使用了来自互联健康政策中心、Casetext、国家法律评论、立法机构和其他公开可用的州远程医疗法律和指南的信息来绘制MAOC和其他州级医疗补助和远程医疗政策变量。研究设计:我们采用双向固定效应广义差中差(DiD)估计量,然后采用Callaway-Sant'Anna DiD估计量来评估MAOC对fqhc心理健康就诊率的影响。结果定义为心理健康访问率,关键自变量为MAOC政策执行情况。时变的州级协变量,包括精神卫生服务提供者比例、宽带接入、医疗补助和远程医疗政策,以及fqhc级协变量,包括医疗补助保险和低收入患者服务的百分比,被纳入分析。根据FQHC特征进行亚组分析,包括农村/城市位置和远程卫生服务(TMHS)的存在。主要发现:DiD分析显示,MAOC对fqhc的心理健康就诊率没有显著影响。然而,亚组分析显示,没有TMHS的家庭健康中心的访问率增加了20.5% (p结论:纯音频远程医疗似乎是家庭健康中心面对面或基于视频的心理健康服务的替代方式,而不是补充方式。在没有建立远程卫生服务的fqhc中,提供MAOC增加了精神卫生就诊率,表明可及性得到改善。考虑到围绕纯音频远程医疗的质量问题,需要进一步研究以验证这种替代效应,并评估将这些服务作为fqhc选择的质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health Services Research
Health Services Research 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
5.90%
发文量
193
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Health Services Research (HSR) is a peer-reviewed scholarly journal that provides researchers and public and private policymakers with the latest research findings, methods, and concepts related to the financing, organization, delivery, evaluation, and outcomes of health services. Rated as one of the top journals in the fields of health policy and services and health care administration, HSR publishes outstanding articles reporting the findings of original investigations that expand knowledge and understanding of the wide-ranging field of health care and that will help to improve the health of individuals and communities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书