Risk Stratification and Neck Pain Management in Office Workers Using Rapid Upper Limb Assessment.

IF 1.5 Q3 RHEUMATOLOGY
Pragya Kumar, Mohammad Ahmad, Jasmine Kaur Chawla
{"title":"Risk Stratification and Neck Pain Management in Office Workers Using Rapid Upper Limb Assessment.","authors":"Pragya Kumar, Mohammad Ahmad, Jasmine Kaur Chawla","doi":"10.1002/msc.70208","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The present study aimed to identify the role Rapid Upper Limb Assessment (RULA) for the assessment of office worker's ergonomics in the workplace and its efficacy in designing targeted interventions with a specific focus on neck pain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Sixty six office workers (Mean Age = 33.04 ± 9.98 years; Mean BMI = 21.45 ± 2.1 kg/m<sup>2</sup>; Females-25; Males-41) with mild to moderate neck disability were after giving their informed consent. Based on RULA scores and ergonomic risk levels, participants were divided into three groups - low risk (Group A; n = 22), moderate risk (Group B; n = 22) and high risk (Group C; n = 22). Targeted interventions including ergonomic counselling, brochures, practical workplace modification sessions, and postural correction exercises were administered. Pre- and post-intervention assessments (at 0, 2 & 4 weeks) for improvements in neck pain, discomfort and ergonomic risk were compared using mixed model ANOVA (p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Findings revealed widespread poor posture among office workers, with tasks involving prolonged computer work, phone usage, and extended sitting periods posing elevated risks of WMSDs. Significant improvements were seen from baseline to weeks 2 & 4 for pain (F = 182.26; p < 0.05), neck disability (F = 667.47, p < 0.05) and postural risk (F = 393.69, p < 0.05). Significant improvements in pain (F = 38.35, p < 0.05) and postural risk (F = 159.27, p < 0.05) were observed between group comparisons. Significant group × time interactions were seen for Neck Disability (F = 8.71, p < 0.05) and postural risk (F = 12.95, p < 0.05) indicating differential gains by risk category. Tukey's post hoc comparison confirmed Group C showed maximum changes (p < 0.05) in pain & postural risk followed by Groups B & A, whereas neck disability did not differ between groups (p > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings indicate that RULA helped in facilitating postural risk stratification, guiding targeted ergonomic interventions to alleviate neck pain and disability among office workers. Further research is recommended to explore the long-term benefits of follow-up-based on continuous ergonomic interventions using artificial intelligence.</p>","PeriodicalId":46945,"journal":{"name":"Musculoskeletal Care","volume":"24 1","pages":"e70208"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Musculoskeletal Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/msc.70208","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The present study aimed to identify the role Rapid Upper Limb Assessment (RULA) for the assessment of office worker's ergonomics in the workplace and its efficacy in designing targeted interventions with a specific focus on neck pain.

Methods: Sixty six office workers (Mean Age = 33.04 ± 9.98 years; Mean BMI = 21.45 ± 2.1 kg/m2; Females-25; Males-41) with mild to moderate neck disability were after giving their informed consent. Based on RULA scores and ergonomic risk levels, participants were divided into three groups - low risk (Group A; n = 22), moderate risk (Group B; n = 22) and high risk (Group C; n = 22). Targeted interventions including ergonomic counselling, brochures, practical workplace modification sessions, and postural correction exercises were administered. Pre- and post-intervention assessments (at 0, 2 & 4 weeks) for improvements in neck pain, discomfort and ergonomic risk were compared using mixed model ANOVA (p < 0.05).

Results: Findings revealed widespread poor posture among office workers, with tasks involving prolonged computer work, phone usage, and extended sitting periods posing elevated risks of WMSDs. Significant improvements were seen from baseline to weeks 2 & 4 for pain (F = 182.26; p < 0.05), neck disability (F = 667.47, p < 0.05) and postural risk (F = 393.69, p < 0.05). Significant improvements in pain (F = 38.35, p < 0.05) and postural risk (F = 159.27, p < 0.05) were observed between group comparisons. Significant group × time interactions were seen for Neck Disability (F = 8.71, p < 0.05) and postural risk (F = 12.95, p < 0.05) indicating differential gains by risk category. Tukey's post hoc comparison confirmed Group C showed maximum changes (p < 0.05) in pain & postural risk followed by Groups B & A, whereas neck disability did not differ between groups (p > 0.05).

Conclusion: The findings indicate that RULA helped in facilitating postural risk stratification, guiding targeted ergonomic interventions to alleviate neck pain and disability among office workers. Further research is recommended to explore the long-term benefits of follow-up-based on continuous ergonomic interventions using artificial intelligence.

使用快速上肢评估的办公室职员的风险分层和颈部疼痛管理。
背景:本研究旨在确定快速上肢评估(RULA)在办公室工作人员人体工程学评估中的作用,以及它在设计针对颈部疼痛的针对性干预措施中的功效。方法:经知情同意,选取66名轻中度颈部残疾上班族(平均年龄33.04±9.98岁,平均BMI = 21.45±2.1 kg/m2,女25岁,男41岁)。根据RULA评分和人体工程学风险水平,将参与者分为低风险组(A组,n = 22)、中度风险组(B组,n = 22)和高风险组(C组,n = 22)。有针对性的干预措施包括人体工程学咨询、小册子、实用的工作场所改造课程和姿势矫正练习。使用混合模型方差分析(p)比较干预前和干预后评估(0、2和4周)对颈部疼痛、不适和人体工程学风险的改善情况。结果:研究结果显示,办公室工作人员普遍存在不良姿势,涉及长时间电脑工作、使用电话和长时间坐着的工作增加了WMSDs的风险。从基线到第2周和第4周,疼痛有显著改善(F = 182.26; p 0.05)。结论:研究结果表明,RULA有助于促进姿势风险分层,指导有针对性的人机工程学干预,以减轻办公室员工的颈部疼痛和残疾。建议进一步研究以探索基于人工智能持续人体工程学干预的随访的长期效益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Musculoskeletal Care
Musculoskeletal Care RHEUMATOLOGY-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
88
期刊介绍: Musculoskeletal Care is a peer-reviewed journal for all health professionals committed to the clinical delivery of high quality care for people with musculoskeletal conditions and providing knowledge to support decision making by professionals, patients and policy makers. This journal publishes papers on original research, applied research, review articles and clinical guidelines. Regular topics include patient education, psychological and social impact, patient experiences of health care, clinical up dates and the effectiveness of therapy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书