{"title":"Genomic profiling in Bulgarian women with ovarian cancer: a dual-sample NGS approach.","authors":"Zornitsa Kamburova, Savelina Popovska, Chavdar Tsvetkov","doi":"10.1186/s13053-026-00336-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BACKGROUND: Ovarian cancer is the deadliest gynecologic malignancy largely due to late diagnosis. The present study aims to provide a comprehensive assessment of clinically relevant and potentially actionable germline and somatic pathways in ovarian cancer through parallel analysis of inherited susceptibility and tumor-specific genomic alterations, within the constraints of targeted NGS panel design. METHODS: We analyzed 33 Bulgarian women with histologically confirmed ovarian cancer. Next‑generation sequencing (NGS) was performed on germline DNA from peripheral blood and tumor DNA from FFPE tissue. Variants were described per HGVS, classified by ACMG/AMP (germline) and AMP/ASCO/CAP (somatic), and reviewed in ClinVar/COSMIC. Descriptive statistics were generated in Python. RESULTS: All pathogenic and likely pathogenic germline and somatic variants are summarized in comprehensive tables. Somatic pathogenic TP53 variants were identified in 27/33 patients (81.8%). Germline pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants were detected in 9/33 (27.3%), most commonly in BRCA1 (3/33; 9.1%), with single cases in ATM, RAD51D, NBN, FANCL and WRN. One patient fulfilled criteria for multi‑locus inherited neoplasia alleles syndrome (MINAS). High‑grade serous ovarian histological subtype predominated (75.8%). CONCLUSIONS: Dual-sample NGS enables an integrated evaluation of hereditary risk and tumor-associated actionable alterations in ovarian cancer. While comprehensive interrogation of all therapeutic pathways is limited by panel scope, this approach supports clinically meaningful stratification and highlights areas requiring expanded molecular testing. </p>","PeriodicalId":55058,"journal":{"name":"Hereditary Cancer in Clinical Practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13137463/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hereditary Cancer in Clinical Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13053-026-00336-z","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Ovarian cancer is the deadliest gynecologic malignancy largely due to late diagnosis. The present study aims to provide a comprehensive assessment of clinically relevant and potentially actionable germline and somatic pathways in ovarian cancer through parallel analysis of inherited susceptibility and tumor-specific genomic alterations, within the constraints of targeted NGS panel design. METHODS: We analyzed 33 Bulgarian women with histologically confirmed ovarian cancer. Next‑generation sequencing (NGS) was performed on germline DNA from peripheral blood and tumor DNA from FFPE tissue. Variants were described per HGVS, classified by ACMG/AMP (germline) and AMP/ASCO/CAP (somatic), and reviewed in ClinVar/COSMIC. Descriptive statistics were generated in Python. RESULTS: All pathogenic and likely pathogenic germline and somatic variants are summarized in comprehensive tables. Somatic pathogenic TP53 variants were identified in 27/33 patients (81.8%). Germline pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants were detected in 9/33 (27.3%), most commonly in BRCA1 (3/33; 9.1%), with single cases in ATM, RAD51D, NBN, FANCL and WRN. One patient fulfilled criteria for multi‑locus inherited neoplasia alleles syndrome (MINAS). High‑grade serous ovarian histological subtype predominated (75.8%). CONCLUSIONS: Dual-sample NGS enables an integrated evaluation of hereditary risk and tumor-associated actionable alterations in ovarian cancer. While comprehensive interrogation of all therapeutic pathways is limited by panel scope, this approach supports clinically meaningful stratification and highlights areas requiring expanded molecular testing.
期刊介绍:
Hereditary Cancer in Clinical Practice is an open access journal that publishes articles of interest for the cancer genetics community and serves as a discussion forum for the development appropriate healthcare strategies.
Cancer genetics encompasses a wide variety of disciplines and knowledge in the field is rapidly growing, especially as the amount of information linking genetic differences to inherited cancer predispositions continues expanding. With the increased knowledge of genetic variability and how this relates to cancer risk there is a growing demand not only to disseminate this information into clinical practice but also to enable competent debate concerning how such information is managed and what it implies for patient care.
Topics covered by the journal include but are not limited to:
Original research articles on any aspect of inherited predispositions to cancer.
Reviews of inherited cancer predispositions.
Application of molecular and cytogenetic analysis to clinical decision making.
Clinical aspects of the management of hereditary cancers.
Genetic counselling issues associated with cancer genetics.
The role of registries in improving health care of patients with an inherited predisposition to cancer.