A Quantitative Framework for Evaluating the Performance of Algorithm-Directed Whole-Population Remote Patient Monitoring: Tutorial for Type 1 Diabetes Care.

IF 2.9 Q2 Medicine
JMIR Diabetes Pub Date : 2026-03-25 DOI:10.2196/72676
Jamie Kurtzig, Ananta Addala, Franziska K Bishop, Paul Dupenloup, Johannes O Ferstad, Ramesh Johari, David M Maahs, Priya Prahalad, Dessi P Zaharieva, David Scheinker
{"title":"A Quantitative Framework for Evaluating the Performance of Algorithm-Directed Whole-Population Remote Patient Monitoring: Tutorial for Type 1 Diabetes Care.","authors":"Jamie Kurtzig, Ananta Addala, Franziska K Bishop, Paul Dupenloup, Johannes O Ferstad, Ramesh Johari, David M Maahs, Priya Prahalad, Dessi P Zaharieva, David Scheinker","doi":"10.2196/72676","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Unlabelled: </strong>Clinics continue to adopt care models shaped by the algorithmic analysis of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) data, such as remote patient monitoring for type 1 diabetes. No clinic-facing quantitative framework currently exists to track the impact of such algorithm-directed care on patient outcomes and clinical workload. We used CGM data from the Teamwork, Targets, Technology, and Tight Control (4T) Study (Pilot n=135 and Study 1 n=133), in which algorithms enable precision, whole-population care by directing clinician attention to patients with deteriorating glucose management. Youth meeting criteria for clinical review are then contacted by Certified Diabetes Care and Education Specialists. Through iterative data analysis and meetings with a variety of stakeholders, we identified metrics for reviewing and revising clinical workloads, glucose management, and timeliness of care. For each metric, we developed an interactive dashboard to provide clinical and administrative leaders with an overview of the program. The metrics to track clinical workload were the total number of youths (1) in the program, (2) in each study, and (3) cared for by each clinician. The metrics to track glucose management were the number of youths meeting each criterion for review, including (4) total, (5) for each clinician, and (6) for each study. The metric to track timeliness of care was (7) the number of days since meeting criteria for clinical review. When presented at regular program leadership meetings, the metrics facilitated data-driven decision-making about clinical and operational components of the program. In this paper, we describe the process of developing and operationalizing this reproducible, clinician-facing key performance indicator tool to monitor an algorithm-enabled remote patient monitoring program. As the role of algorithms grows in directing clinical effort and prioritizing patients for care, this framework may help clinics track clinical workload, patient outcomes, and the timeliness of care.</p>","PeriodicalId":52371,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Diabetes","volume":"11 ","pages":"e72676"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13016190/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR Diabetes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/72676","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Unlabelled: Clinics continue to adopt care models shaped by the algorithmic analysis of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) data, such as remote patient monitoring for type 1 diabetes. No clinic-facing quantitative framework currently exists to track the impact of such algorithm-directed care on patient outcomes and clinical workload. We used CGM data from the Teamwork, Targets, Technology, and Tight Control (4T) Study (Pilot n=135 and Study 1 n=133), in which algorithms enable precision, whole-population care by directing clinician attention to patients with deteriorating glucose management. Youth meeting criteria for clinical review are then contacted by Certified Diabetes Care and Education Specialists. Through iterative data analysis and meetings with a variety of stakeholders, we identified metrics for reviewing and revising clinical workloads, glucose management, and timeliness of care. For each metric, we developed an interactive dashboard to provide clinical and administrative leaders with an overview of the program. The metrics to track clinical workload were the total number of youths (1) in the program, (2) in each study, and (3) cared for by each clinician. The metrics to track glucose management were the number of youths meeting each criterion for review, including (4) total, (5) for each clinician, and (6) for each study. The metric to track timeliness of care was (7) the number of days since meeting criteria for clinical review. When presented at regular program leadership meetings, the metrics facilitated data-driven decision-making about clinical and operational components of the program. In this paper, we describe the process of developing and operationalizing this reproducible, clinician-facing key performance indicator tool to monitor an algorithm-enabled remote patient monitoring program. As the role of algorithms grows in directing clinical effort and prioritizing patients for care, this framework may help clinics track clinical workload, patient outcomes, and the timeliness of care.

评估算法导向的全民远程患者监测性能的定量框架:1型糖尿病护理指南。
无标签:诊所继续采用由连续血糖监测(CGM)数据的算法分析形成的护理模式,例如远程监测1型糖尿病患者。目前还没有面向临床的量化框架来跟踪这种算法导向的护理对患者结果和临床工作量的影响。我们使用了来自团队合作、目标、技术和严格控制(4T)研究(试点n=135和研究1 n=133)的CGM数据,在该研究中,算法通过指导临床医生关注血糖管理恶化的患者,实现了精确的全人群护理。符合临床审查标准的青年,然后由认证糖尿病护理和教育专家联系。通过反复的数据分析和与各种利益相关者的会议,我们确定了审查和修改临床工作量、血糖管理和护理及时性的指标。对于每个指标,我们开发了一个交互式仪表板,为临床和行政领导提供该计划的概述。跟踪临床工作量的指标是(1)参加该计划的青少年总数,(2)参加每项研究的青少年总数,以及(3)由每位临床医生照顾的青少年总数。跟踪血糖管理的指标是符合每个审查标准的青少年人数,包括(4)总数,(5)每个临床医生,(6)每个研究。跟踪护理及时性的指标是(7)达到临床审查标准后的天数。当在定期的项目领导会议上提出时,这些指标促进了关于项目临床和操作组成部分的数据驱动决策。在本文中,我们描述了开发和操作这个可重复的,面向临床医生的关键绩效指标工具的过程,以监测算法支持的远程患者监测程序。随着算法在指导临床工作和优先考虑患者护理方面的作用越来越大,该框架可以帮助诊所跟踪临床工作量、患者结果和护理的及时性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JMIR Diabetes
JMIR Diabetes Computer Science-Computer Science Applications
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
35
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书