Safety-net Leadership Perspectives on Collaborative Care for Children With Developmental Disabilities.

IF 1.5 3区 医学 Q3 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Anisha P Srinivasan, Melanie Venegas, R Scott Akins, Erik Fernandez Y Garcia, Aubyn C Stahmer
{"title":"Safety-net Leadership Perspectives on Collaborative Care for Children With Developmental Disabilities.","authors":"Anisha P Srinivasan, Melanie Venegas, R Scott Akins, Erik Fernandez Y Garcia, Aubyn C Stahmer","doi":"10.1097/DBP.0000000000001476","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To identify key barriers and facilitators to designing and implementing collaborative care (CC) for children with developmental disabilities (DD) in safety-net primary care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This pre-implementation qualitative study involved semi-structured interviews with safety-net primary care leaders. Using purposive and respondent-driven sampling, interviews were conducted with 16 leaders across 9 safety-net organizations in Northern California between August 2024 and January 2025. Key Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) constructs guided data collection. Data were analyzed using the Rapid Assessment Process and validated through structured member checking.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Leaders from 8 of 9 organizations reported existing integrated behavioral health programs staffed by mental health counselors and/or psychiatrists, but nearly all noted that these programs did not address the specific needs of children with DD. When asked about developing a CC intervention for this population, leaders identified implementation barriers and facilitators that mapped to CFIR inner and outer setting domains. Four themes were distilled: inner setting barriers (space and cost), inner setting facilitators (perceived clinical need among leadership), outer setting barriers (restrictive Medicaid reimbursement policies and limited performance measurement pressure), and outer setting facilitators (alternative financing mechanisms).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Safety-net leaders indicate a clinical need for CC models specifically for children with DD, but implementation success will depend on addressing space, financing, and policy barriers through targeted implementation strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":50215,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics","volume":" ","pages":"e461-e466"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/DBP.0000000000001476","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To identify key barriers and facilitators to designing and implementing collaborative care (CC) for children with developmental disabilities (DD) in safety-net primary care.

Methods: This pre-implementation qualitative study involved semi-structured interviews with safety-net primary care leaders. Using purposive and respondent-driven sampling, interviews were conducted with 16 leaders across 9 safety-net organizations in Northern California between August 2024 and January 2025. Key Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) constructs guided data collection. Data were analyzed using the Rapid Assessment Process and validated through structured member checking.

Results: Leaders from 8 of 9 organizations reported existing integrated behavioral health programs staffed by mental health counselors and/or psychiatrists, but nearly all noted that these programs did not address the specific needs of children with DD. When asked about developing a CC intervention for this population, leaders identified implementation barriers and facilitators that mapped to CFIR inner and outer setting domains. Four themes were distilled: inner setting barriers (space and cost), inner setting facilitators (perceived clinical need among leadership), outer setting barriers (restrictive Medicaid reimbursement policies and limited performance measurement pressure), and outer setting facilitators (alternative financing mechanisms).

Conclusion: Safety-net leaders indicate a clinical need for CC models specifically for children with DD, but implementation success will depend on addressing space, financing, and policy barriers through targeted implementation strategies.

发展性残疾儿童协同照顾的安全网领导视角。
目的:确定在安全网初级保健中为发育性残疾儿童设计和实施协作护理(CC)的主要障碍和促进因素。方法:本实施前定性研究包括对安全网初级保健负责人的半结构化访谈。在2024年8月至2025年1月期间,采用有目的和受访者驱动的抽样方式,对北加州9个安全网组织的16位领导人进行了采访。实施研究关键综合框架(CFIR)构建指导性数据收集。使用快速评估流程对数据进行分析,并通过结构化成员检查对数据进行验证。结果:9个组织中有8个组织的领导报告了现有的由心理健康顾问和/或精神科医生组成的综合行为健康计划,但几乎所有组织都注意到这些计划没有解决DD儿童的具体需求。当被问及为这一人群开发CC干预措施时,领导确定了实施障碍和促进因素,这些障碍和促进因素与cir内部和外部设置域有关。提炼出四个主题:内部设置障碍(空间和成本)、内部设置障碍(领导层感知到的临床需求)、外部设置障碍(限制性医疗补助报销政策和有限的绩效评估压力)和外部设置障碍(替代融资机制)。结论:安全网的领导者指出,临床需要针对DD儿童的CC模式,但实施成功将取决于通过有针对性的实施策略解决空间、资金和政策障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
8.30%
发文量
155
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics (JDBP) is a leading resource for clinicians, teachers, and researchers involved in pediatric healthcare and child development. This important journal covers some of the most challenging issues affecting child development and behavior.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书