Qualitative User-Centered Design: Programming Changes in a Self-Management Blood Pressure Application.

IF 2.7 2区 医学 Q4 MEDICAL INFORMATICS
Applied Clinical Informatics Pub Date : 2026-03-01 Epub Date: 2026-03-25 DOI:10.1055/a-2823-4533
Shannon M Canfield, Abigail J Rolbiecki, Parijat Ghosh, Emma Montgomery, Victoria A Shaffer, Michelle Bobo, Matthew B Storer, Aisha Ghumman, LeAnne Michaels, David A Dorr, Richelle J Koopman
{"title":"Qualitative User-Centered Design: Programming Changes in a Self-Management Blood Pressure Application.","authors":"Shannon M Canfield, Abigail J Rolbiecki, Parijat Ghosh, Emma Montgomery, Victoria A Shaffer, Michelle Bobo, Matthew B Storer, Aisha Ghumman, LeAnne Michaels, David A Dorr, Richelle J Koopman","doi":"10.1055/a-2823-4533","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Electronic patient-centered clinical decision support enhances chronic disease self-management, yet few studies describe how qualitative user feedback is systematically translated into programming improvements. The Collaboration-Oriented Approach to Controlling High Blood Pressure (COACH) is a patient-facing decision support tool for hypertension management, designed for primary care and integration with electronic health records (EHRs) and patient portals.This study aimed to describe how end-user feedback informed COACH programming decisions and the MoSCoW (Must have, Should have, Could have, Won't have) method operationalized prioritization for implementation.This secondary analysis draws on qualitative data from a Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR)-informed data collected during a preimplementation evaluation of COACH with 70 care team members and 18 patients across three academic health systems using Cerner/Oracle and Epic EHRs. CFIR-coded data were reviewed, and design or usability \"recommendations\" were translated into discrete programming requirements, prioritized using the MoSCoW, and, where possible, completed before a multisite trial.Seven themes emerged: (1) Timely, actionable alerts, (2) messaging features for follow-up, (3) motivating patients through feedback, (4) reducing data entry burden, (5) setting blood pressure goals, (6) supporting workflow integration, and (7) equity and accessibility. Of the 35 potential recommendations, 25 were translated into changes and prioritized as \"Must have\" (12), \"Should have\" (6), and \"Could have\" (7). Our team completed 19 high-priority features (e.g., setting the blood pressure goal, structured alerts, messaging templates, and visual feedback) before the trial launch.This study demonstrates a replicable process for integrating qualitative insights into digital health programming through structured prioritization, advancing implementation-focused clinical informatics, and guiding decision-making for the future integration of patient-generated health data, such as home blood pressure monitoring.</p>","PeriodicalId":48956,"journal":{"name":"Applied Clinical Informatics","volume":"17 2","pages":"127-137"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13016953/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Clinical Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2823-4533","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICAL INFORMATICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Electronic patient-centered clinical decision support enhances chronic disease self-management, yet few studies describe how qualitative user feedback is systematically translated into programming improvements. The Collaboration-Oriented Approach to Controlling High Blood Pressure (COACH) is a patient-facing decision support tool for hypertension management, designed for primary care and integration with electronic health records (EHRs) and patient portals.This study aimed to describe how end-user feedback informed COACH programming decisions and the MoSCoW (Must have, Should have, Could have, Won't have) method operationalized prioritization for implementation.This secondary analysis draws on qualitative data from a Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR)-informed data collected during a preimplementation evaluation of COACH with 70 care team members and 18 patients across three academic health systems using Cerner/Oracle and Epic EHRs. CFIR-coded data were reviewed, and design or usability "recommendations" were translated into discrete programming requirements, prioritized using the MoSCoW, and, where possible, completed before a multisite trial.Seven themes emerged: (1) Timely, actionable alerts, (2) messaging features for follow-up, (3) motivating patients through feedback, (4) reducing data entry burden, (5) setting blood pressure goals, (6) supporting workflow integration, and (7) equity and accessibility. Of the 35 potential recommendations, 25 were translated into changes and prioritized as "Must have" (12), "Should have" (6), and "Could have" (7). Our team completed 19 high-priority features (e.g., setting the blood pressure goal, structured alerts, messaging templates, and visual feedback) before the trial launch.This study demonstrates a replicable process for integrating qualitative insights into digital health programming through structured prioritization, advancing implementation-focused clinical informatics, and guiding decision-making for the future integration of patient-generated health data, such as home blood pressure monitoring.

定性的以用户为中心的设计:自我管理血压应用程序中的编程变化。
以患者为中心的电子临床决策支持增强了慢性疾病的自我管理,但很少有研究描述如何将定性用户反馈系统地转化为编程改进。以协作为导向的高血压控制方法(COACH)是一种面向患者的高血压管理决策支持工具,专为初级保健设计,并与电子健康记录(EHRs)和患者门户网站集成。本研究旨在描述最终用户反馈如何影响COACH规划决策,以及MoSCoW(必须拥有、应该拥有、可能拥有、不会拥有)方法如何实现可操作的优先级。这一次要分析利用了实施研究统一框架(CFIR)的定性数据,这些数据是在使用Cerner/Oracle和Epic电子病历对三个学术卫生系统的70名护理团队成员和18名患者进行COACH实施前评估期间收集的。审查了cfr编码的数据,并将设计或可用性“建议”转化为离散的编程需求,使用MoSCoW进行优先排序,并且在可能的情况下,在多站点试验之前完成。出现了七个主题:(1)及时、可操作的警报;(2)随访的消息传递功能;(3)通过反馈激励患者;(4)减少数据输入负担;(5)设定血压目标;(6)支持工作流集成;(7)公平和可访问性。在35个潜在的建议中,有25个被转化为变化,并被优先排序为“必须有”(12),“应该有”(6)和“可能有”(7)。我们的团队在试运行前完成了19项高优先级功能(例如,设置血压目标、结构化警报、消息模板和视觉反馈)。本研究展示了一个可复制的过程,通过结构化的优先级,推进以实施为重点的临床信息学,并指导未来整合患者生成的健康数据(如家庭血压监测)的决策,将定性见解整合到数字健康规划中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Applied Clinical Informatics
Applied Clinical Informatics MEDICAL INFORMATICS-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
24.10%
发文量
132
期刊介绍: ACI is the third Schattauer journal dealing with biomedical and health informatics. It perfectly complements our other journals Öffnet internen Link im aktuellen FensterMethods of Information in Medicine and the Öffnet internen Link im aktuellen FensterYearbook of Medical Informatics. The Yearbook of Medical Informatics being the “Milestone” or state-of-the-art journal and Methods of Information in Medicine being the “Science and Research” journal of IMIA, ACI intends to be the “Practical” journal of IMIA.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书