Travelling with(in) critical AI studies: An east Asian standpoint.

IF 3.3
Media, culture, and society Pub Date : 2025-10-21 eCollection Date: 2026-04-01 DOI:10.1177/01634437251385483
Hiu-Fung Chung
{"title":"Travelling with(in) critical AI studies: An east Asian standpoint.","authors":"Hiu-Fung Chung","doi":"10.1177/01634437251385483","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>How does critical AI studies itself travel, and what happens when it arrives elsewhere? This commentary reflects on the global circulation of critique from the standpoint of East Asia, where layered histories of modernization, technological aspiration, and cultural traditions generate alternative ways of knowing, imagining, and critiquing AI beyond South-North frameworks. Writing from my position as a graduate student from East Asia, now trained in a North American institution, I introduce three analytical vectors-<i>tangle, transplant</i>, and <i>transmute</i>-all of which emerge dialogically through my research on AI innovation in East Asia and through engagement with Asian media scholarship addressing similar concerns. Through vignettes from this research journey, I suggest that these themes illuminate how dominant critical vocabularies encounter local imaginaries, on-the-ground frictions, socio-cultural histories, and divergent ethical orientations. Rather than proposing a unified Asian critical theory of AI, I offer \"traveling AI\" as a reflexive praxis that centers relational co-constitution, situated reworking, and philosophical reorientation, while remaining attuned to epistemic tensions and power differentials. In dialogue with broader de-westernizing projects, this paper suggests that East Asia can contribute to reimagining critique not as theory from the center or the periphery, but as an <i>ongoing praxis of troubling with in-betweenness</i>.</p>","PeriodicalId":74138,"journal":{"name":"Media, culture, and society","volume":"48 3","pages":"595-607"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13005706/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Media, culture, and society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/01634437251385483","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/4/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

How does critical AI studies itself travel, and what happens when it arrives elsewhere? This commentary reflects on the global circulation of critique from the standpoint of East Asia, where layered histories of modernization, technological aspiration, and cultural traditions generate alternative ways of knowing, imagining, and critiquing AI beyond South-North frameworks. Writing from my position as a graduate student from East Asia, now trained in a North American institution, I introduce three analytical vectors-tangle, transplant, and transmute-all of which emerge dialogically through my research on AI innovation in East Asia and through engagement with Asian media scholarship addressing similar concerns. Through vignettes from this research journey, I suggest that these themes illuminate how dominant critical vocabularies encounter local imaginaries, on-the-ground frictions, socio-cultural histories, and divergent ethical orientations. Rather than proposing a unified Asian critical theory of AI, I offer "traveling AI" as a reflexive praxis that centers relational co-constitution, situated reworking, and philosophical reorientation, while remaining attuned to epistemic tensions and power differentials. In dialogue with broader de-westernizing projects, this paper suggests that East Asia can contribute to reimagining critique not as theory from the center or the periphery, but as an ongoing praxis of troubling with in-betweenness.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

带着批判性人工智能研究旅行:东亚的立场。
批判性人工智能研究本身是如何传播的,当它到达其他地方时会发生什么?这篇评论从东亚的角度反映了批评的全球循环,在东亚,现代化、技术抱负和文化传统的分层历史产生了超越南北框架的认识、想象和批评人工智能的替代方式。作为一名来自东亚的研究生,我现在在北美的一所机构接受培训,我介绍了三个分析向量——纠结、移植和转化——所有这些都是通过我对东亚人工智能创新的研究以及通过与亚洲媒体学者的接触来解决类似问题的对话出现的。通过这一研究旅程中的小插曲,我认为这些主题阐明了占主导地位的批判性词汇是如何遇到当地想象、实地摩擦、社会文化历史和不同的伦理取向的。我并没有提出一种统一的亚洲人工智能批判理论,而是将“旅行的人工智能”作为一种反思性实践,它以关系共构、情境重构和哲学重新定位为中心,同时保持对认知紧张和权力差异的协调。在与更广泛的去西方化项目的对话中,本文认为东亚可以为重新想象批评做出贡献,而不是作为来自中心或边缘的理论,而是作为一种持续的中间性实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书