Outcomes and Complications of Suture-Button versus All-Suture Suspensionplasty in Thumb Carpometacarpal Arthritis: A Retrospective Comparative Study.

IF 0.5 Q4 SURGERY
Sergi Barrera-Ochoa, Melissa Bonilla-Chaperon, Tryno Muñoz-Perdomo, Gerardo Mendez-Sanchez, Gustavo Sosa-Viain
{"title":"Outcomes and Complications of Suture-Button versus All-Suture Suspensionplasty in Thumb Carpometacarpal Arthritis: A Retrospective Comparative Study.","authors":"Sergi Barrera-Ochoa, Melissa Bonilla-Chaperon, Tryno Muñoz-Perdomo, Gerardo Mendez-Sanchez, Gustavo Sosa-Viain","doi":"10.1142/S2424835526500153","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Our objective is to compare clinical, radiographic and complication-related outcomes between two non-autologous implants - Mini TightRope<sup>®</sup> and Microlink™ - used in suspensionplasty following open trapeziectomy for thumb carpometacarpal joint arthritis. <b>Methods:</b> We retrospectively analysed 77 patients (41 Mini TightRope<sup>®</sup>, 36 Microlink™) treated between 2017 and 2021 with a minimum follow-up of 36 months. All surgeries were performed by the same experienced hand surgeon using a standardised open technique. Pre- and postoperative assessments included Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QDASH), visual analogue scale (VAS; rest and effort), Kapandji score, grip and pinch strength, thumb range of motion (ROM), patient satisfaction and radiographic evaluation for metacarpal subsidence. Complications and reoperations were recorded and compared. <b>Results:</b> Both groups demonstrated significant clinical improvement, with no statistically significant differences in functional scores, ROM, strength, pain or satisfaction. Implant-related complications differed notably: four Mini TightRope<sup>®</sup> patients (9.8%) required implant removal due to discomfort, and one experienced a transient sensory neurapraxia, yielding a total complication rate of 12.2%. In the Microlink™ group, only one patient (2.8%) experienced a similar neurapraxia, and no implant removals or reoperations were needed. No subsidence was observed in either group. <b>Conclusions:</b> Both implants were clinically effective, but the Microlink™ device was associated with a lower complication rate and no removals. These findings suggest that all-suture implants may offer improved soft-tissue compatibility. This is the first clinical report on Microlink™, and its mid-term results appear comparable to those of the more established Mini TightRope<sup>®</sup>. Further prospective studies are warranted to assess long-term outcomes. <b>Level of Evidence:</b> Level III (Therapeutic).</p>","PeriodicalId":51689,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hand Surgery-Asian-Pacific Volume","volume":" ","pages":"167-174"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hand Surgery-Asian-Pacific Volume","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1142/S2424835526500153","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Our objective is to compare clinical, radiographic and complication-related outcomes between two non-autologous implants - Mini TightRope® and Microlink™ - used in suspensionplasty following open trapeziectomy for thumb carpometacarpal joint arthritis. Methods: We retrospectively analysed 77 patients (41 Mini TightRope®, 36 Microlink™) treated between 2017 and 2021 with a minimum follow-up of 36 months. All surgeries were performed by the same experienced hand surgeon using a standardised open technique. Pre- and postoperative assessments included Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QDASH), visual analogue scale (VAS; rest and effort), Kapandji score, grip and pinch strength, thumb range of motion (ROM), patient satisfaction and radiographic evaluation for metacarpal subsidence. Complications and reoperations were recorded and compared. Results: Both groups demonstrated significant clinical improvement, with no statistically significant differences in functional scores, ROM, strength, pain or satisfaction. Implant-related complications differed notably: four Mini TightRope® patients (9.8%) required implant removal due to discomfort, and one experienced a transient sensory neurapraxia, yielding a total complication rate of 12.2%. In the Microlink™ group, only one patient (2.8%) experienced a similar neurapraxia, and no implant removals or reoperations were needed. No subsidence was observed in either group. Conclusions: Both implants were clinically effective, but the Microlink™ device was associated with a lower complication rate and no removals. These findings suggest that all-suture implants may offer improved soft-tissue compatibility. This is the first clinical report on Microlink™, and its mid-term results appear comparable to those of the more established Mini TightRope®. Further prospective studies are warranted to assess long-term outcomes. Level of Evidence: Level III (Therapeutic).

缝合-钮扣与全缝合悬吊成形术治疗拇指手掌骨关节炎的疗效和并发症:回顾性比较研究。
背景:我们的目的是比较两种非自体植入物(Mini TightRope®和Microlink™)在开放式椎体切除术后用于拇指腕关节关节炎悬吊成形术的临床、影像学和并发症相关结果。方法:回顾性分析2017年至2021年期间接受治疗的77例患者(41例Mini TightRope®,36例Microlink™),至少随访36个月。所有手术均由同一位经验丰富的手外科医生使用标准化开放技术进行。术前和术后评估包括手臂、肩膀和手的快速残疾(QDASH)、视觉模拟量表(VAS;休息和努力)、Kapandji评分、握力和捏力、拇指活动范围(ROM)、患者满意度和掌骨下沉的x线评估。记录并发症及再手术情况并进行比较。结果:两组临床表现均有显著改善,在功能评分、ROM、力量、疼痛和满意度方面无统计学差异。植入物相关并发症差异显著:4名Mini TightRope®患者(9.8%)因不适需要移除植入物,1名患者出现短暂的感觉神经失用,总并发症率为12.2%。在Microlink™组中,只有一名患者(2.8%)经历了类似的神经失用,并且不需要移除植入物或再次手术。两组均未见沉降。结论:两种植入物在临床上都是有效的,但Microlink™装置的并发症发生率较低,并且没有移除。这些发现表明全缝线植入物可以改善软组织相容性。这是Microlink™的第一份临床报告,其中期结果似乎可与更成熟的Mini TightRope®相媲美。需要进一步的前瞻性研究来评估长期结果。证据等级:III级(治疗性)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
304
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书