{"title":"Outcomes and Complications of Suture-Button versus All-Suture Suspensionplasty in Thumb Carpometacarpal Arthritis: A Retrospective Comparative Study.","authors":"Sergi Barrera-Ochoa, Melissa Bonilla-Chaperon, Tryno Muñoz-Perdomo, Gerardo Mendez-Sanchez, Gustavo Sosa-Viain","doi":"10.1142/S2424835526500153","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Our objective is to compare clinical, radiographic and complication-related outcomes between two non-autologous implants - Mini TightRope<sup>®</sup> and Microlink™ - used in suspensionplasty following open trapeziectomy for thumb carpometacarpal joint arthritis. <b>Methods:</b> We retrospectively analysed 77 patients (41 Mini TightRope<sup>®</sup>, 36 Microlink™) treated between 2017 and 2021 with a minimum follow-up of 36 months. All surgeries were performed by the same experienced hand surgeon using a standardised open technique. Pre- and postoperative assessments included Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QDASH), visual analogue scale (VAS; rest and effort), Kapandji score, grip and pinch strength, thumb range of motion (ROM), patient satisfaction and radiographic evaluation for metacarpal subsidence. Complications and reoperations were recorded and compared. <b>Results:</b> Both groups demonstrated significant clinical improvement, with no statistically significant differences in functional scores, ROM, strength, pain or satisfaction. Implant-related complications differed notably: four Mini TightRope<sup>®</sup> patients (9.8%) required implant removal due to discomfort, and one experienced a transient sensory neurapraxia, yielding a total complication rate of 12.2%. In the Microlink™ group, only one patient (2.8%) experienced a similar neurapraxia, and no implant removals or reoperations were needed. No subsidence was observed in either group. <b>Conclusions:</b> Both implants were clinically effective, but the Microlink™ device was associated with a lower complication rate and no removals. These findings suggest that all-suture implants may offer improved soft-tissue compatibility. This is the first clinical report on Microlink™, and its mid-term results appear comparable to those of the more established Mini TightRope<sup>®</sup>. Further prospective studies are warranted to assess long-term outcomes. <b>Level of Evidence:</b> Level III (Therapeutic).</p>","PeriodicalId":51689,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hand Surgery-Asian-Pacific Volume","volume":" ","pages":"167-174"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hand Surgery-Asian-Pacific Volume","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1142/S2424835526500153","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Our objective is to compare clinical, radiographic and complication-related outcomes between two non-autologous implants - Mini TightRope® and Microlink™ - used in suspensionplasty following open trapeziectomy for thumb carpometacarpal joint arthritis. Methods: We retrospectively analysed 77 patients (41 Mini TightRope®, 36 Microlink™) treated between 2017 and 2021 with a minimum follow-up of 36 months. All surgeries were performed by the same experienced hand surgeon using a standardised open technique. Pre- and postoperative assessments included Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QDASH), visual analogue scale (VAS; rest and effort), Kapandji score, grip and pinch strength, thumb range of motion (ROM), patient satisfaction and radiographic evaluation for metacarpal subsidence. Complications and reoperations were recorded and compared. Results: Both groups demonstrated significant clinical improvement, with no statistically significant differences in functional scores, ROM, strength, pain or satisfaction. Implant-related complications differed notably: four Mini TightRope® patients (9.8%) required implant removal due to discomfort, and one experienced a transient sensory neurapraxia, yielding a total complication rate of 12.2%. In the Microlink™ group, only one patient (2.8%) experienced a similar neurapraxia, and no implant removals or reoperations were needed. No subsidence was observed in either group. Conclusions: Both implants were clinically effective, but the Microlink™ device was associated with a lower complication rate and no removals. These findings suggest that all-suture implants may offer improved soft-tissue compatibility. This is the first clinical report on Microlink™, and its mid-term results appear comparable to those of the more established Mini TightRope®. Further prospective studies are warranted to assess long-term outcomes. Level of Evidence: Level III (Therapeutic).