Minimally invasive salvage esophagectomy following definitive chemoradiotherapy for esophageal cancer.

IF 2.3 3区 医学
Shigeru Tsunoda, Tatsuto Nishigori, Shintaro Okumura, Shigeo Hisamori, Keiko Kasahara, Takashi Sakamoto, Tomonori Morimoto, Hiromitsu Kinoshita, Kazutaka Obama
{"title":"Minimally invasive salvage esophagectomy following definitive chemoradiotherapy for esophageal cancer.","authors":"Shigeru Tsunoda, Tatsuto Nishigori, Shintaro Okumura, Shigeo Hisamori, Keiko Kasahara, Takashi Sakamoto, Tomonori Morimoto, Hiromitsu Kinoshita, Kazutaka Obama","doi":"10.1093/dote/doag026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Salvage esophagectomy is the only remaining treatment option for the potentially curative treatment of residual or recurrent esophageal cancer in patients who underwent definitive chemoradiotherapy (dCRT). However, its postoperative morbidity and mortality have been reported to be high. Although the minimally invasive method has become the preferred approach for nonsalvage esophagectomy because of its reduced surgical trauma and magnified view, its feasibility and oncological results for salvage esophagectomy remain unknown. A retrospective investigation was conducted on 45 patients who had undergone minimally invasive salvage esophagectomy for residual tumors or recurrence after dCRT between 2010 and 2024. There were 38 subtotal esophagectomies and seven total pharyngo-laryngo-esophagectomies. The R0 resection rate was 89%. Severe postoperative morbidity (≥Clavien-Dindo grade III) and overall postoperative morbidity (≥grade II) rates were 11% and 64%, respectively. Anastomotic leakage was found in 10 patients (22%). The rate of anastomotic leakage after dCRT with 60 Gy or more accounted for 31% (9/29), whereas it was 6% (1/16) after dCRT with no more than 50.4 Gy (P = 0.071). There was no 30-day or 90-day mortality. The 3-year overall survival rate and 3-year relapse-free survival (RFS) rates were 74% and 56%, respectively. When compared by pathological nodal status, patients who had positive pathological node metastasis showed considerably poorer RFS (P = 0.003). The 3-year RFS of pathologically node-positive patients was 20% and 69% in node-negative patients. In this article, we will describe the essence of our techniques for safe minimally invasive salvage esophagectomy.</p>","PeriodicalId":54277,"journal":{"name":"Diseases of the Esophagus","volume":"39 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diseases of the Esophagus","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/dote/doag026","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Salvage esophagectomy is the only remaining treatment option for the potentially curative treatment of residual or recurrent esophageal cancer in patients who underwent definitive chemoradiotherapy (dCRT). However, its postoperative morbidity and mortality have been reported to be high. Although the minimally invasive method has become the preferred approach for nonsalvage esophagectomy because of its reduced surgical trauma and magnified view, its feasibility and oncological results for salvage esophagectomy remain unknown. A retrospective investigation was conducted on 45 patients who had undergone minimally invasive salvage esophagectomy for residual tumors or recurrence after dCRT between 2010 and 2024. There were 38 subtotal esophagectomies and seven total pharyngo-laryngo-esophagectomies. The R0 resection rate was 89%. Severe postoperative morbidity (≥Clavien-Dindo grade III) and overall postoperative morbidity (≥grade II) rates were 11% and 64%, respectively. Anastomotic leakage was found in 10 patients (22%). The rate of anastomotic leakage after dCRT with 60 Gy or more accounted for 31% (9/29), whereas it was 6% (1/16) after dCRT with no more than 50.4 Gy (P = 0.071). There was no 30-day or 90-day mortality. The 3-year overall survival rate and 3-year relapse-free survival (RFS) rates were 74% and 56%, respectively. When compared by pathological nodal status, patients who had positive pathological node metastasis showed considerably poorer RFS (P = 0.003). The 3-year RFS of pathologically node-positive patients was 20% and 69% in node-negative patients. In this article, we will describe the essence of our techniques for safe minimally invasive salvage esophagectomy.

食管癌放化疗后微创补救性食管切除术。
补救性食管癌切除术是对接受明确放化疗(dCRT)的残余或复发食管癌患者进行潜在治愈治疗的唯一剩余治疗选择。然而,据报道其术后发病率和死亡率很高。虽然微创方法因其手术创伤小、视野放大而成为非补救性食管切除术的首选方法,但其在补救性食管切除术中的可行性和肿瘤学结果尚不清楚。回顾性分析2010年至2024年间45例dCRT术后残余肿瘤或复发行微创补救性食管切除术的患者。食管次全切除术38例,咽喉部-食管全切除术7例。R0切除率为89%。术后严重发病率(≥Clavien-Dindo III级)和术后总发病率(≥II级)分别为11%和64%。吻合口瘘10例(22%)。60 Gy及以上dCRT术后吻合口瘘发生率为31%(9/29),而不大于50.4 Gy dCRT术后吻合口瘘发生率为6% (1/16)(P = 0.071)。没有30天或90天死亡率。3年总生存率和3年无复发生存率分别为74%和56%。与病理淋巴结状态比较,病理淋巴结转移阳性患者的RFS明显较差(P = 0.003)。病理淋巴结阳性患者的3年RFS为20%,淋巴结阴性患者为69%。在这篇文章中,我们将描述我们安全的微创补救性食管切除术的技术要点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Diseases of the Esophagus
Diseases of the Esophagus Medicine-Gastroenterology
自引率
7.70%
发文量
568
期刊介绍: Diseases of the Esophagus covers all aspects of the esophagus - etiology, investigation and diagnosis, and both medical and surgical treatment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书