Blood Biomarkers for Identifying Epidural Hematoma in Patients Presenting with a Glasgow Coma Scale of 13-15: A Collaborative European Neurotrauma Effectiveness Research in Traumatic Brain Injury (CENTER-TBI) Study.

IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Journal of neurotrauma Pub Date : 2026-09-01 Epub Date: 2026-03-23 DOI:10.1177/08977151261430239
Katja Malmi, Dana Pisică, Iftakher Hossain, Mehrbod Mohammadian, Thomas van Essen, Teemu M Luoto, Stefania Mondello, Riikka S K Takala, Olli Tenovuo, Thijs Vande Vyvere, Rick Vreeburg, John K Yue, Andrew I R Maas, Kevin K W Wang, David K Menon, Virginia F J Newcombe, András Büki, Jussi P Posti
{"title":"Blood Biomarkers for Identifying Epidural Hematoma in Patients Presenting with a Glasgow Coma Scale of 13-15: A Collaborative European Neurotrauma Effectiveness Research in Traumatic Brain Injury (CENTER-TBI) Study.","authors":"Katja Malmi, Dana Pisică, Iftakher Hossain, Mehrbod Mohammadian, Thomas van Essen, Teemu M Luoto, Stefania Mondello, Riikka S K Takala, Olli Tenovuo, Thijs Vande Vyvere, Rick Vreeburg, John K Yue, Andrew I R Maas, Kevin K W Wang, David K Menon, Virginia F J Newcombe, András Büki, Jussi P Posti","doi":"10.1177/08977151261430239","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Triage of patients with mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) and possible isolated epidural hematoma (iEDH) remains a clinical challenge. Blood-based biomarkers are being integrated into mTBI management, but their ability to identify patients with iEDH is uncertain. In this prospective, multicenter cohort study from the Collaborative European NeuroTrauma Effectiveness Research in Traumatic Brain Injury study, which recruited between December 19, 2014, and December 17, 2017 (NCT02210221), we included 1,048 mTBI patients (Glasgow Coma Scale ≥ 13) with biomarker sampling and head computed tomography (CT) within 24 h of injury. We assessed six blood-based biomarkers-including glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) and ubiquitin carboxy-terminal hydrolase L1 (UCH-L1)-for their diagnostic performance in identifying patients with mTBI and iEDH. Patients with other traumatic intracranial findings potentially requiring surgery were excluded. Of 1,048 patients (median age 46 years; 64% male), 38 (3.6%) had iEDH and 982 (94%) had negative CT findings. GFAP showed the highest diagnostic accuracy for iEDH (area under the curve 0.77; 95% confidence interval 0.71-0.83) and yielded a negative predictive value of 1.0 at a threshold of 0.19 μg/L. The addition of UCH-L1 did not lead to a significant improvement in diagnostic performance. No significant correlation was found between EDH volume and biomarker levels. In this large multicenter study, GFAP was the only biomarker that could adequately distinguish patients with iEDH from CT-negative cases. These results suggest that GFAP may serve as a tool to rule out iEDH in patients with Glasgow Coma Scale ≥ 13, supporting its use in identifying individuals unlikely to require acute intervention for intracranial injury.</p>","PeriodicalId":16512,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurotrauma","volume":" ","pages":"1443-1455"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neurotrauma","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08977151261430239","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Triage of patients with mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) and possible isolated epidural hematoma (iEDH) remains a clinical challenge. Blood-based biomarkers are being integrated into mTBI management, but their ability to identify patients with iEDH is uncertain. In this prospective, multicenter cohort study from the Collaborative European NeuroTrauma Effectiveness Research in Traumatic Brain Injury study, which recruited between December 19, 2014, and December 17, 2017 (NCT02210221), we included 1,048 mTBI patients (Glasgow Coma Scale ≥ 13) with biomarker sampling and head computed tomography (CT) within 24 h of injury. We assessed six blood-based biomarkers-including glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) and ubiquitin carboxy-terminal hydrolase L1 (UCH-L1)-for their diagnostic performance in identifying patients with mTBI and iEDH. Patients with other traumatic intracranial findings potentially requiring surgery were excluded. Of 1,048 patients (median age 46 years; 64% male), 38 (3.6%) had iEDH and 982 (94%) had negative CT findings. GFAP showed the highest diagnostic accuracy for iEDH (area under the curve 0.77; 95% confidence interval 0.71-0.83) and yielded a negative predictive value of 1.0 at a threshold of 0.19 μg/L. The addition of UCH-L1 did not lead to a significant improvement in diagnostic performance. No significant correlation was found between EDH volume and biomarker levels. In this large multicenter study, GFAP was the only biomarker that could adequately distinguish patients with iEDH from CT-negative cases. These results suggest that GFAP may serve as a tool to rule out iEDH in patients with Glasgow Coma Scale ≥ 13, supporting its use in identifying individuals unlikely to require acute intervention for intracranial injury.

血液生物标志物在格拉斯哥昏迷评分为13-15的患者中识别硬膜外血肿:一项欧洲合作的创伤性脑损伤神经创伤有效性研究(CENTER-TBI)研究
轻度创伤性脑损伤(mTBI)和可能孤立的硬膜外血肿(iEDH)患者的分类仍然是一个临床挑战。基于血液的生物标志物正被整合到mTBI管理中,但它们识别iEDH患者的能力尚不确定。在这项前瞻性、多中心队列研究中,研究人员从2014年12月19日至2017年12月17日(NCT02210221)招募了1048名mTBI患者(格拉斯哥昏迷量表≥13),并在损伤后24小时内进行了生物标志物采样和头部计算机断层扫描(CT)。我们评估了六种基于血液的生物标志物,包括胶质纤维酸性蛋白(GFAP)和泛素羧基末端水解酶L1 (UCH-L1),用于识别mTBI和iEDH患者的诊断性能。有其他可能需要手术的颅内外伤性发现的患者被排除在外。在1048例患者(中位年龄46岁,男性64%)中,38例(3.6%)患有iEDH, 982例(94%)CT阴性。GFAP对iEDH的诊断准确率最高(曲线下面积0.77,95%可信区间0.71 ~ 0.83),阈值为0.19 μg/L时的阴性预测值为1.0。UCH-L1的加入并没有导致诊断性能的显著改善。EDH体积与生物标志物水平无显著相关性。在这项大型多中心研究中,GFAP是唯一能够充分区分iEDH患者和ct阴性病例的生物标志物。这些结果表明GFAP可以作为格拉斯哥昏迷评分≥13的患者排除iEDH的工具,支持其用于识别不太可能需要急性颅内损伤干预的个体。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of neurotrauma
Journal of neurotrauma 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
7.10%
发文量
233
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Neurotrauma is the flagship, peer-reviewed publication for reporting on the latest advances in both the clinical and laboratory investigation of traumatic brain and spinal cord injury. The Journal focuses on the basic pathobiology of injury to the central nervous system, while considering preclinical and clinical trials targeted at improving both the early management and long-term care and recovery of traumatically injured patients. This is the essential journal publishing cutting-edge basic and translational research in traumatically injured human and animal studies, with emphasis on neurodegenerative disease research linked to CNS trauma.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书