Temporal Discontinuity in Continuous Glucose Monitoring: How Midnight Segmentation Generates Systematic Measurement Artifact.

IF 7.4 2区 医学 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Diabetes technology & therapeutics Pub Date : 2026-10-01 Epub Date: 2026-03-23 DOI:10.1177/15209156261435242
Mark Paull
{"title":"Temporal Discontinuity in Continuous Glucose Monitoring: How Midnight Segmentation Generates Systematic Measurement Artifact.","authors":"Mark Paull","doi":"10.1177/15209156261435242","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) generates dense physiological time-series data sampled every 5 min across 24-h periods. Standard analytical approaches impose calendar-based temporal boundaries-treating midnight as a natural segmentation point-despite glucose homeostasis operating through continuous circadian oscillators that recognize no such delimiter. This structural misalignment introduces a systematic measurement artifact: biologically continuous overnight patterns are bisected at 00:00, artificially inflating glycemic variability estimates and obscuring individual circadian phase relationships. We analyzed approximately 60 days of CGM data, comparing three binning strategies: (1) 24 linear hour-bins (conventional), (2) 36 linear 40-min bins (resolution control), and (3) 36 angular 10° bins (circular topology). Shannon entropy with variance-weighted probabilities quantified information content. Bootstrap resampling (1000 iterations) and null topology permutation (random within-day time-permutation, 1000 iterations) distinguished genuine temporal structure from mathematical artifact. Circular representation demonstrated 12.1% higher information entropy compared to linear binning at matched resolution (3.56 vs. 3.18 bits, <i>P</i> < 0.001, bootstrap percentile method), with nonoverlapping confidence intervals (95% CI: 3.41-3.71 vs. 3.06-3.30). Increasing from 24 to 36 bins in linear space produced zero entropy change (3.18→3.18), isolating topological continuity as the information-preserving factor. Midnight boundary created 2.8-fold reduction in continuity correlation (<i>r</i> = 0.31 vs. <i>r</i> = 0.87, <i>P</i> < 0.001) for biologically adjacent timepoints. Analysis showed nonrandom angular variance structure (<i>P</i> < 0.001), with 1.97-fold variance differential between evening (21:20-00:00) and midday (11:20-14:00) zones. Midnight segmentation introduces quantifiable information loss through temporal discontinuity. Circular time representation-mapping 24-h cycles onto angular coordinates using established directional statistics-eliminates this artifact while preserving temporal information. Current glycemic variability metrics (coefficient of variation, time-in-range) calculated within midnight-bounded periods inherit discontinuity artifacts, potentially misclassifying normal circadian oscillations as pathological variability. Adoption of circular frameworks would align CGM analytics with chronobiological principles and enable individual circadian phenotyping without data manipulation. This represents methodological infrastructure requiring prospective validation for clinical utility.</p>","PeriodicalId":11159,"journal":{"name":"Diabetes technology & therapeutics","volume":" ","pages":"1104-1109"},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetes technology & therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15209156261435242","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) generates dense physiological time-series data sampled every 5 min across 24-h periods. Standard analytical approaches impose calendar-based temporal boundaries-treating midnight as a natural segmentation point-despite glucose homeostasis operating through continuous circadian oscillators that recognize no such delimiter. This structural misalignment introduces a systematic measurement artifact: biologically continuous overnight patterns are bisected at 00:00, artificially inflating glycemic variability estimates and obscuring individual circadian phase relationships. We analyzed approximately 60 days of CGM data, comparing three binning strategies: (1) 24 linear hour-bins (conventional), (2) 36 linear 40-min bins (resolution control), and (3) 36 angular 10° bins (circular topology). Shannon entropy with variance-weighted probabilities quantified information content. Bootstrap resampling (1000 iterations) and null topology permutation (random within-day time-permutation, 1000 iterations) distinguished genuine temporal structure from mathematical artifact. Circular representation demonstrated 12.1% higher information entropy compared to linear binning at matched resolution (3.56 vs. 3.18 bits, P < 0.001, bootstrap percentile method), with nonoverlapping confidence intervals (95% CI: 3.41-3.71 vs. 3.06-3.30). Increasing from 24 to 36 bins in linear space produced zero entropy change (3.18→3.18), isolating topological continuity as the information-preserving factor. Midnight boundary created 2.8-fold reduction in continuity correlation (r = 0.31 vs. r = 0.87, P < 0.001) for biologically adjacent timepoints. Analysis showed nonrandom angular variance structure (P < 0.001), with 1.97-fold variance differential between evening (21:20-00:00) and midday (11:20-14:00) zones. Midnight segmentation introduces quantifiable information loss through temporal discontinuity. Circular time representation-mapping 24-h cycles onto angular coordinates using established directional statistics-eliminates this artifact while preserving temporal information. Current glycemic variability metrics (coefficient of variation, time-in-range) calculated within midnight-bounded periods inherit discontinuity artifacts, potentially misclassifying normal circadian oscillations as pathological variability. Adoption of circular frameworks would align CGM analytics with chronobiological principles and enable individual circadian phenotyping without data manipulation. This represents methodological infrastructure requiring prospective validation for clinical utility.

连续血糖监测中的时间不连续:午夜分割如何产生系统测量伪影。
连续血糖监测(CGM)产生密集的生理时间序列数据,每5分钟采样一次,跨越24小时周期。标准的分析方法强加了基于日历的时间边界——将午夜视为一个自然的分割点——尽管葡萄糖稳态通过连续的昼夜节律振荡器运行,而不识别这样的分隔符。这种结构错位引入了一种系统的测量伪影:生物学上连续的夜间模式在00:00被一分为二,人为地夸大了血糖变异性的估计,模糊了个体昼夜节律阶段的关系。我们分析了大约60天的CGM数据,比较了三种分类策略:(1)24个线性小时分类箱(常规),(2)36个线性40分钟分类箱(分辨率控制),(3)36个角10°分类箱(圆形拓扑)。方差加权概率的香农熵量化信息内容。自举重采样(1000次迭代)和零拓扑排列(一天内随机时间排列,1000次迭代)将真正的时间结构与数学伪制品区分开来。在匹配分辨率下,圆形表示的信息熵比线性分形高12.1%(3.56比特vs. 3.18比特,P < 0.001, bootstrap百分位数法),置信区间不重叠(95% CI: 3.41-3.71 vs. 3.06-3.30)。线性空间中从24个桶增加到36个桶产生零熵变化(3.18→3.18),隔离了拓扑连续性作为信息保留因子。午夜边界使生物相邻时间点的连续性相关性降低2.8倍(r = 0.31 vs r = 0.87, P < 0.001)。分析显示,角度方差结构非随机(P < 0.001),夜间(21:20-00:00)和正午(11:20-14:00)区域的方差差异为1.97倍。午夜分割通过时间不连续引入了可量化的信息损失。循环时间表示——使用已建立的方向统计量将24小时周期映射到角坐标上——在保留时间信息的同时消除了这种伪影。目前在午夜区间内计算的血糖变异性指标(变异系数,时间范围)继承了不连续的伪影,可能将正常的昼夜节律振荡错误地分类为病理变异性。采用循环框架将使CGM分析与时间生物学原理保持一致,并使个体昼夜节律表型无需数据操作。这代表了需要对临床应用进行前瞻性验证的方法学基础设施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Diabetes technology & therapeutics
Diabetes technology & therapeutics 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
10.60
自引率
14.80%
发文量
145
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics is the only peer-reviewed journal providing healthcare professionals with information on new devices, drugs, drug delivery systems, and software for managing patients with diabetes. This leading international journal delivers practical information and comprehensive coverage of cutting-edge technologies and therapeutics in the field, and each issue highlights new pharmacological and device developments to optimize patient care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书