Iron (Fe) isotopes decipher Fe fate in acid mine drainage within a karst watershed

IF 5.2 1区 地球科学 Q1 GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS
Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta Pub Date : 2026-06-15 Epub Date: 2026-03-22 DOI:10.1016/j.gca.2026.03.035
Yuhui Liu , Yafei Xia , Jing Sun , Lei Song , Ting Gao , Meng Qi , Chengshuai Liu
{"title":"Iron (Fe) isotopes decipher Fe fate in acid mine drainage within a karst watershed","authors":"Yuhui Liu ,&nbsp;Yafei Xia ,&nbsp;Jing Sun ,&nbsp;Lei Song ,&nbsp;Ting Gao ,&nbsp;Meng Qi ,&nbsp;Chengshuai Liu","doi":"10.1016/j.gca.2026.03.035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The fate of Fe in acid mine drainage (AMD) profoundly affects water quality and pollutant migration. In karst watersheds, although it is acknowledged that carbonate buffering strongly controls the fate of Fe in AMD, the impacts of hydrochemical variations induced by karst hydrology and anthropogenic remediation measures remain poorly understood. This study employs Fe isotopes to elucidate the Fe sources, transformation pathways, and controlling factors in a karst watershed impacted by AMD. Results reveal that dissolved Fe(II) is primarily derived from the oxidative dissolution of coal-hosted pyrite. As AMD migrates underground, the enrichment of heavy Fe isotopes in shaft sediments (Δ<sup>56</sup>Fe<sub>sediment-water</sub> = +0.86‰) indicates additional isotope fractionation during subsequent Fe(II) oxidation-precipitation, as supported by mass-balance calculations. Furthermore, following anthropogenic source reduction measures (e.g., grout sealing), the δ<sup>56</sup>Fe values of outfall waters exhibit a transient shift (&lt;1 year) toward lighter signatures. Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) confirms that this isotopic lightening is driven by temporary enhancement of carbonate buffering that subsequently elevates the Fe(II) oxidation ratio. At the surface, Δ<sup>56</sup>Fe<sub>sediment–water</sub> values are notably high at acidic outfalls (+0.85‰ to +1.49‰), yet decrease (+0.18‰ to +0.94‰) upon mixing with alkaline karst river water. These different isotope fractionations reflect the sensitivity of Fe(II) oxidation to pH, as alkalinity promotes a higher oxidation ratio shifting the fractionation mechanism from an oxidation-controlled to a precipitation-dominated regime. Collectively, these results establish a process-dependent framework for Fe isotope fractionation in AMD-impacted watershed and highlight the limitation of carbonate attenuation under both natural and engineered hydrological perturbations.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":327,"journal":{"name":"Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta","volume":"423 ","pages":"Pages 266-282"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S001670372600195X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The fate of Fe in acid mine drainage (AMD) profoundly affects water quality and pollutant migration. In karst watersheds, although it is acknowledged that carbonate buffering strongly controls the fate of Fe in AMD, the impacts of hydrochemical variations induced by karst hydrology and anthropogenic remediation measures remain poorly understood. This study employs Fe isotopes to elucidate the Fe sources, transformation pathways, and controlling factors in a karst watershed impacted by AMD. Results reveal that dissolved Fe(II) is primarily derived from the oxidative dissolution of coal-hosted pyrite. As AMD migrates underground, the enrichment of heavy Fe isotopes in shaft sediments (Δ56Fesediment-water = +0.86‰) indicates additional isotope fractionation during subsequent Fe(II) oxidation-precipitation, as supported by mass-balance calculations. Furthermore, following anthropogenic source reduction measures (e.g., grout sealing), the δ56Fe values of outfall waters exhibit a transient shift (<1 year) toward lighter signatures. Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) confirms that this isotopic lightening is driven by temporary enhancement of carbonate buffering that subsequently elevates the Fe(II) oxidation ratio. At the surface, Δ56Fesediment–water values are notably high at acidic outfalls (+0.85‰ to +1.49‰), yet decrease (+0.18‰ to +0.94‰) upon mixing with alkaline karst river water. These different isotope fractionations reflect the sensitivity of Fe(II) oxidation to pH, as alkalinity promotes a higher oxidation ratio shifting the fractionation mechanism from an oxidation-controlled to a precipitation-dominated regime. Collectively, these results establish a process-dependent framework for Fe isotope fractionation in AMD-impacted watershed and highlight the limitation of carbonate attenuation under both natural and engineered hydrological perturbations.
铁(铁)同位素揭示了喀斯特流域酸性矿井水中铁的去向
酸性矿井水中铁的命运影响着水质和污染物的迁移。在喀斯特流域,虽然碳酸盐缓冲作用强烈地控制了AMD中铁的命运,但喀斯特水文和人为修复措施引起的水化学变化的影响仍然知之甚少。本研究利用铁同位素研究了AMD影响下喀斯特流域铁的来源、转化途径及控制因素。结果表明,溶解的Fe(II)主要来源于含煤黄铁矿的氧化溶解。随着AMD向地下迁移,竖井沉积物中重铁同位素富集(Δ56Fesediment-water = +0.86‰)表明在随后的Fe(II)氧化沉淀过程中存在额外的同位素分异,这得到了质量平衡计算的支持。此外,在人为源减少措施(如灌浆密封)之后,出水口水体的δ56Fe值表现出短暂的(1年)向较轻的特征转移。偏最小二乘结构方程模型(PLS-SEM)证实,这种同位素变轻是由碳酸盐缓冲的暂时增强所驱动的,从而提高了Fe(II)的氧化比。地表酸性出水Δ56Fesediment-water值较高(+0.85‰~ +1.49‰),与碱性喀斯特河水混合后Δ56Fesediment-water值降低(+0.18‰~ +0.94‰)。这些不同的同位素分馏反映了Fe(II)氧化对pH的敏感性,因为碱度促进了更高的氧化比,将分馏机制从氧化控制转变为沉淀主导。总的来说,这些结果建立了amd影响流域中铁同位素分异的过程依赖框架,并强调了自然和工程水文扰动下碳酸盐衰减的局限性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta
Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 地学-地球化学与地球物理
CiteScore
9.60
自引率
14.00%
发文量
437
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta publishes research papers in a wide range of subjects in terrestrial geochemistry, meteoritics, and planetary geochemistry. The scope of the journal includes: 1). Physical chemistry of gases, aqueous solutions, glasses, and crystalline solids 2). Igneous and metamorphic petrology 3). Chemical processes in the atmosphere, hydrosphere, biosphere, and lithosphere of the Earth 4). Organic geochemistry 5). Isotope geochemistry 6). Meteoritics and meteorite impacts 7). Lunar science; and 8). Planetary geochemistry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书