Towards Prescribing Pathways for Oral Health Practitioners in Australia: Addressing Barriers to Patient-Centered Care

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Journal of public health dentistry Pub Date : 2026-06-06 Epub Date: 2026-03-21 DOI:10.1111/jphd.70055
W. Carlson-Jones, T. Acret, A. Ayo, P. Westhoff, L. A. Church, M. Ratnaweera, B. Christian, J. Park, N. Stormon
{"title":"Towards Prescribing Pathways for Oral Health Practitioners in Australia: Addressing Barriers to Patient-Centered Care","authors":"W. Carlson-Jones,&nbsp;T. Acret,&nbsp;A. Ayo,&nbsp;P. Westhoff,&nbsp;L. A. Church,&nbsp;M. Ratnaweera,&nbsp;B. Christian,&nbsp;J. Park,&nbsp;N. Stormon","doi":"10.1111/jphd.70055","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Oral health practitioners (OHPs) provide essential preventive, periodontal, and restorative treatment within diverse settings in Australia. Despite their significant contribution to oral healthcare, regulatory restrictions prevent OHPs from independent prescription of medicines, limiting efficiency, continuity of care, and patient access, particularly for underserved populations.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Issue</h3>\n \n <p>Current prescibing limitations create structural barriers within oral healthcare delivery. In contrast, endorsed prescribing pathways have been successfully developed for other professions, including nurses, midwives, podiatrists, optometrists, and pharmacists, with nurse practitioners and dentists already holding established prescribing authority.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Approach</h3>\n \n <p>This paper explores the case for an endorsed prescribing pathway for OHPs, drawing on national and international developments, patient equity considerations, and workforce reform. We argue that prescribing reform would strengthen patient-centered care, reduce structural barriers to access, and align OHP regulation with contemporary models of multidisciplinary healthcare. We also highlight necessary safeguards such as postgraduate training, regulatory oversight, and scope-appropriate medications to ensure safe and effective implementation.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>As independent practitioners, the persistence of restrictive prescribing frameworks for OHPs reflects outdated professional dominance rather than evidence-based workforce planning. Expanding prescribing rights for OHPs represents a logical evolution of their role and an opportunity to address entrenched oral health inequities.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":16913,"journal":{"name":"Journal of public health dentistry","volume":"86 2","pages":"232-239"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jphd.70055","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of public health dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jphd.70055","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Oral health practitioners (OHPs) provide essential preventive, periodontal, and restorative treatment within diverse settings in Australia. Despite their significant contribution to oral healthcare, regulatory restrictions prevent OHPs from independent prescription of medicines, limiting efficiency, continuity of care, and patient access, particularly for underserved populations.

Issue

Current prescibing limitations create structural barriers within oral healthcare delivery. In contrast, endorsed prescribing pathways have been successfully developed for other professions, including nurses, midwives, podiatrists, optometrists, and pharmacists, with nurse practitioners and dentists already holding established prescribing authority.

Approach

This paper explores the case for an endorsed prescribing pathway for OHPs, drawing on national and international developments, patient equity considerations, and workforce reform. We argue that prescribing reform would strengthen patient-centered care, reduce structural barriers to access, and align OHP regulation with contemporary models of multidisciplinary healthcare. We also highlight necessary safeguards such as postgraduate training, regulatory oversight, and scope-appropriate medications to ensure safe and effective implementation.

Conclusion

As independent practitioners, the persistence of restrictive prescribing frameworks for OHPs reflects outdated professional dominance rather than evidence-based workforce planning. Expanding prescribing rights for OHPs represents a logical evolution of their role and an opportunity to address entrenched oral health inequities.

Abstract Image

对处方途径的口腔卫生从业人员在澳大利亚:解决障碍,以病人为中心的护理。
背景:口腔健康从业者(ohp)提供必要的预防,牙周和恢复性治疗在澳大利亚不同的设置。尽管ohp对口腔保健做出了重大贡献,但监管限制阻碍了ohp独立开处方,限制了效率、护理的连续性和患者的可及性,特别是对服务不足的人群。问题:目前的处方限制造成了口腔保健服务的结构性障碍。相比之下,认可的处方途径已经成功地发展为其他职业,包括护士、助产士、足病医生、验光师和药剂师,执业护士和牙医已经拥有既定的处方权威。方法:本文根据国家和国际发展、患者公平考虑和劳动力改革,探讨了ohp批准处方途径的案例。我们认为,处方改革将加强以患者为中心的护理,减少获得结构性障碍,并使OHP监管与当代多学科医疗保健模式保持一致。我们还强调了必要的保障措施,如研究生培训、监管监督和适用范围的药物,以确保安全有效地实施。结论:作为独立的从业者,ohp限制性处方框架的持续存在反映了过时的专业主导地位,而不是基于证据的劳动力规划。扩大OHPs的处方权是其作用的合乎逻辑的演变,也是解决根深蒂固的口腔卫生不公平现象的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of public health dentistry
Journal of public health dentistry 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
4.30%
发文量
69
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Public Health Dentistry is devoted to the advancement of public health dentistry through the exploration of related research, practice, and policy developments. Three main types of articles are published: original research articles that provide a significant contribution to knowledge in the breadth of dental public health, including oral epidemiology, dental health services, the behavioral sciences, and the public health practice areas of assessment, policy development, and assurance; methods articles that report the development and testing of new approaches to research design, data collection and analysis, or the delivery of public health services; and review articles that synthesize previous research in the discipline and provide guidance to others conducting research as well as to policy makers, managers, and other dental public health practitioners.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书