Determining suicide risk in an adolescent population: Questionnaire-based approaches.

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Health Informatics Journal Pub Date : 2026-01-01 Epub Date: 2026-03-21 DOI:10.1177/14604582251383777
Ane Varela, Maite Oronoz, Arantza Casillas, Alexander Muela, Jon García-Ormaza, Alicia Pérez
{"title":"Determining suicide risk in an adolescent population: Questionnaire-based approaches.","authors":"Ane Varela, Maite Oronoz, Arantza Casillas, Alexander Muela, Jon García-Ormaza, Alicia Pérez","doi":"10.1177/14604582251383777","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> In the context of assessing suicide risk using questionnaires as measurement instruments, the main goals are: (i) to compare the performance of the classification task with knowledge-based algorithms and inferred approaches, and (ii) to reduce the set of questionnaires. <b>Methods:</b> A classification task is performed on the set of questionnaires considering two methods: expert knowledge translated to algorithms and represented as diagrams, and data-inferred machine learning models. Feature ablation is performed to reduce the questionnaire items. <b>Results:</b> Machine learning models are able to detect risk with an F1 macro average score of up to 85%, significantly better than knowledge-based models. The number of questionnaire items can be reduced with no significant impact. <b>Conclusions:</b> Inferred models can be used to predict the level of suicide risk with a reduced set of questionnaires. Moreover, the Suicide Cognitions Scale-Revised questionnaire is seen to be the most impactful in the prediction.</p>","PeriodicalId":55069,"journal":{"name":"Health Informatics Journal","volume":"32 1","pages":"14604582251383777"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Informatics Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14604582251383777","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: In the context of assessing suicide risk using questionnaires as measurement instruments, the main goals are: (i) to compare the performance of the classification task with knowledge-based algorithms and inferred approaches, and (ii) to reduce the set of questionnaires. Methods: A classification task is performed on the set of questionnaires considering two methods: expert knowledge translated to algorithms and represented as diagrams, and data-inferred machine learning models. Feature ablation is performed to reduce the questionnaire items. Results: Machine learning models are able to detect risk with an F1 macro average score of up to 85%, significantly better than knowledge-based models. The number of questionnaire items can be reduced with no significant impact. Conclusions: Inferred models can be used to predict the level of suicide risk with a reduced set of questionnaires. Moreover, the Suicide Cognitions Scale-Revised questionnaire is seen to be the most impactful in the prediction.

确定青少年人群的自杀风险:基于问卷的方法。
目的:在使用问卷作为测量工具来评估自杀风险的背景下,主要目标是:(i)比较基于知识的算法和推断方法的分类任务的性能;(ii)减少问卷的数量。方法:考虑两种方法对一组问卷进行分类任务:将专家知识转化为算法并表示为图表,以及数据推断的机器学习模型。进行特征消融以减少问卷项目。结果:机器学习模型能够以高达85%的F1宏观平均分数检测风险,明显优于基于知识的模型。问卷项目的数量可以减少,没有显著的影响。结论:通过减少问卷数量,可以使用推断模型来预测自杀风险水平。此外,自杀认知量表-修订问卷在预测中被认为是最有效的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health Informatics Journal
Health Informatics Journal HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-MEDICAL INFORMATICS
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
6.70%
发文量
80
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Health Informatics Journal is an international peer-reviewed journal. All papers submitted to Health Informatics Journal are subject to peer review by members of a carefully appointed editorial board. The journal operates a conventional single-blind reviewing policy in which the reviewer’s name is always concealed from the submitting author.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书