{"title":"Cost-effectiveness analysis of point-of-care A1C tests in the primary care setting of Iran.","authors":"Abdoreza Mousavi, Mehdi Raadabadi, Ali Darvishi","doi":"10.1080/14737167.2026.2650163","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Given the critical role of timely monitoring in diabetes management, effective and accessible testing strategies are increasingly vital. This study evaluated the cost-effectiveness of point-of-care A1c (POC-A1c) testing compared with traditional laboratory-based A1c testing in primary care settings in Iran.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>A lifetime (40 year) Markov model was developed to estimate expected costs (valued in 2023 PPP-adjusted US dollars), quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) for the two strategies. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed to assess uncertainty in key model parameters.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>POC-A1C was associated with an incremental cost of US$1,647.76 and a 0.15 QALY gain versus traditional laboratory testing, yielding an ICER of US$10,717.27 per QALY. Consequently, it was cost-effective at a willingness-to-pay threshold equal to Iran's 2023 per capita GDP. Also, based on probabilistic sensitivity analysis, the probability of POC-A1C being cost-effective was 58%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings suggest that integrating POC-A1c testing into primary care may represent a valuable strategy for strengthening diabetes management in Iran. While associated with higher direct costs, its potential to improve glycemic control and long-term health outcomes supports consideration by policymakers, particularly in the context of expanding access to timely diabetes monitoring.</p>","PeriodicalId":12244,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research","volume":" ","pages":"549-556"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14737167.2026.2650163","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Given the critical role of timely monitoring in diabetes management, effective and accessible testing strategies are increasingly vital. This study evaluated the cost-effectiveness of point-of-care A1c (POC-A1c) testing compared with traditional laboratory-based A1c testing in primary care settings in Iran.
Research design and methods: A lifetime (40 year) Markov model was developed to estimate expected costs (valued in 2023 PPP-adjusted US dollars), quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) for the two strategies. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed to assess uncertainty in key model parameters.
Results: POC-A1C was associated with an incremental cost of US$1,647.76 and a 0.15 QALY gain versus traditional laboratory testing, yielding an ICER of US$10,717.27 per QALY. Consequently, it was cost-effective at a willingness-to-pay threshold equal to Iran's 2023 per capita GDP. Also, based on probabilistic sensitivity analysis, the probability of POC-A1C being cost-effective was 58%.
Conclusions: These findings suggest that integrating POC-A1c testing into primary care may represent a valuable strategy for strengthening diabetes management in Iran. While associated with higher direct costs, its potential to improve glycemic control and long-term health outcomes supports consideration by policymakers, particularly in the context of expanding access to timely diabetes monitoring.
期刊介绍:
Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research (ISSN 1473-7167) provides expert reviews on cost-benefit and pharmacoeconomic issues relating to the clinical use of drugs and therapeutic approaches. Coverage includes pharmacoeconomics and quality-of-life research, therapeutic outcomes, evidence-based medicine and cost-benefit research. All articles are subject to rigorous peer-review.
The journal adopts the unique Expert Review article format, offering a complete overview of current thinking in a key technology area, research or clinical practice, augmented by the following sections:
Expert Opinion – a personal view of the data presented in the article, a discussion on the developments that are likely to be important in the future, and the avenues of research likely to become exciting as further studies yield more detailed results
Article Highlights – an executive summary of the author’s most critical points.