Cost-effectiveness analysis of point-of-care A1C tests in the primary care setting of Iran.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Abdoreza Mousavi, Mehdi Raadabadi, Ali Darvishi
{"title":"Cost-effectiveness analysis of point-of-care A1C tests in the primary care setting of Iran.","authors":"Abdoreza Mousavi, Mehdi Raadabadi, Ali Darvishi","doi":"10.1080/14737167.2026.2650163","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Given the critical role of timely monitoring in diabetes management, effective and accessible testing strategies are increasingly vital. This study evaluated the cost-effectiveness of point-of-care A1c (POC-A1c) testing compared with traditional laboratory-based A1c testing in primary care settings in Iran.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>A lifetime (40 year) Markov model was developed to estimate expected costs (valued in 2023 PPP-adjusted US dollars), quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) for the two strategies. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed to assess uncertainty in key model parameters.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>POC-A1C was associated with an incremental cost of US$1,647.76 and a 0.15 QALY gain versus traditional laboratory testing, yielding an ICER of US$10,717.27 per QALY. Consequently, it was cost-effective at a willingness-to-pay threshold equal to Iran's 2023 per capita GDP. Also, based on probabilistic sensitivity analysis, the probability of POC-A1C being cost-effective was 58%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings suggest that integrating POC-A1c testing into primary care may represent a valuable strategy for strengthening diabetes management in Iran. While associated with higher direct costs, its potential to improve glycemic control and long-term health outcomes supports consideration by policymakers, particularly in the context of expanding access to timely diabetes monitoring.</p>","PeriodicalId":12244,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research","volume":" ","pages":"549-556"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14737167.2026.2650163","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Given the critical role of timely monitoring in diabetes management, effective and accessible testing strategies are increasingly vital. This study evaluated the cost-effectiveness of point-of-care A1c (POC-A1c) testing compared with traditional laboratory-based A1c testing in primary care settings in Iran.

Research design and methods: A lifetime (40 year) Markov model was developed to estimate expected costs (valued in 2023 PPP-adjusted US dollars), quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) for the two strategies. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed to assess uncertainty in key model parameters.

Results: POC-A1C was associated with an incremental cost of US$1,647.76 and a 0.15 QALY gain versus traditional laboratory testing, yielding an ICER of US$10,717.27 per QALY. Consequently, it was cost-effective at a willingness-to-pay threshold equal to Iran's 2023 per capita GDP. Also, based on probabilistic sensitivity analysis, the probability of POC-A1C being cost-effective was 58%.

Conclusions: These findings suggest that integrating POC-A1c testing into primary care may represent a valuable strategy for strengthening diabetes management in Iran. While associated with higher direct costs, its potential to improve glycemic control and long-term health outcomes supports consideration by policymakers, particularly in the context of expanding access to timely diabetes monitoring.

伊朗初级保健机构即时护理A1C检测的成本-效果分析
背景:鉴于及时监测在糖尿病管理中的关键作用,有效和可获得的检测策略变得越来越重要。本研究评估了在伊朗初级保健机构中,即时糖化血红蛋白(pocc -A1c)检测与传统的实验室糖化血红蛋白检测的成本效益。研究设计和方法:建立了终身(40年)马尔可夫模型,以估计两种策略的预期成本(以2023年购买力平价调整后的美元计价)、质量调整寿命年(QALYs)和增量成本-效果比(ICERs)。采用确定性和概率敏感性分析来评估关键模型参数的不确定性。结果:与传统实验室检测相比,POC-A1C与1,647.76美元的增量成本和0.15的QALY增益相关,每个QALY的ICER为10,717.27美元。因此,在支付意愿阈值等于伊朗2023年的人均GDP时,它是具有成本效益的。此外,基于概率敏感性分析,POC-A1C具有成本效益的概率为58%。结论:这些发现表明,将POC-A1c检测纳入初级保健可能是加强伊朗糖尿病管理的一种有价值的策略。虽然与较高的直接成本相关,但其改善血糖控制和长期健康结果的潜力值得决策者考虑,特别是在扩大及时获得糖尿病监测的背景下。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research
Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
4.30%
发文量
68
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research (ISSN 1473-7167) provides expert reviews on cost-benefit and pharmacoeconomic issues relating to the clinical use of drugs and therapeutic approaches. Coverage includes pharmacoeconomics and quality-of-life research, therapeutic outcomes, evidence-based medicine and cost-benefit research. All articles are subject to rigorous peer-review. The journal adopts the unique Expert Review article format, offering a complete overview of current thinking in a key technology area, research or clinical practice, augmented by the following sections: Expert Opinion – a personal view of the data presented in the article, a discussion on the developments that are likely to be important in the future, and the avenues of research likely to become exciting as further studies yield more detailed results Article Highlights – an executive summary of the author’s most critical points.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书