Polygenic scores and physical fitness prediction: a systematic review.

IF 3.4 2区 生物学 Q2 GENETICS & HEREDITY
Farzaneh Rami, Nazanin Vaziri, Amanda V Tyndall, David W Anderson, Marc J Poulin, Chad A Bousman
{"title":"Polygenic scores and physical fitness prediction: a systematic review.","authors":"Farzaneh Rami, Nazanin Vaziri, Amanda V Tyndall, David W Anderson, Marc J Poulin, Chad A Bousman","doi":"10.1007/s00439-026-02820-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Polygenic scores (PGS) have emerged as a promising tool for understanding the genetic underpinnings of physical fitness traits, including aerobic fitness (also called cardiorespiratory fitness), muscular fitness and adiposity, and neuromotor performance (including agility/speed-related parameters). However, the predictive utility of PGS for physical fitness traits is unclear. To address this knowledge gap, we conducted a systematic review to critically evaluate the current body of literature on the association between weighted and unweighted PGS models, and various fitness-related phenotypes. Following PRISMA guidelines, we identified 67 studies published prior to May 2025 that examined 74 weighted and 39 unweighted PGS models in relation to cardiovascular, respiratory, muscular and adiposity, and/or neuromotor performance-related parameters. We classified body composition along with muscular fitness in the same category, because of the close correlation of these parameters. Our evaluation highlights key genetic components implicated in fitness traits, the methodological heterogeneity across studies, and the limitations of current PGS models. While PGSs offer insights into the genetic architecture of physical fitness, their practical application remains constrained by population specificity, polygenic complexity, and environmental interactions. We discuss the implications for personalized interventions and future research directions to enhance the predictive utility of PGS for physical fitness.</p>","PeriodicalId":13175,"journal":{"name":"Human Genetics","volume":"145 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Genetics","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00439-026-02820-x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Polygenic scores (PGS) have emerged as a promising tool for understanding the genetic underpinnings of physical fitness traits, including aerobic fitness (also called cardiorespiratory fitness), muscular fitness and adiposity, and neuromotor performance (including agility/speed-related parameters). However, the predictive utility of PGS for physical fitness traits is unclear. To address this knowledge gap, we conducted a systematic review to critically evaluate the current body of literature on the association between weighted and unweighted PGS models, and various fitness-related phenotypes. Following PRISMA guidelines, we identified 67 studies published prior to May 2025 that examined 74 weighted and 39 unweighted PGS models in relation to cardiovascular, respiratory, muscular and adiposity, and/or neuromotor performance-related parameters. We classified body composition along with muscular fitness in the same category, because of the close correlation of these parameters. Our evaluation highlights key genetic components implicated in fitness traits, the methodological heterogeneity across studies, and the limitations of current PGS models. While PGSs offer insights into the genetic architecture of physical fitness, their practical application remains constrained by population specificity, polygenic complexity, and environmental interactions. We discuss the implications for personalized interventions and future research directions to enhance the predictive utility of PGS for physical fitness.

多基因评分和身体健康预测:系统综述。
多基因评分(PGS)已经成为一种很有前景的工具,用于理解身体健康特征的遗传基础,包括有氧健康(也称为心肺健康),肌肉健康和肥胖,以及神经运动表现(包括敏捷性/速度相关参数)。然而,PGS对身体健康特征的预测效用尚不清楚。为了解决这一知识差距,我们进行了一项系统综述,以批判性地评估当前关于加权和未加权PGS模型与各种健康相关表型之间关系的文献。根据PRISMA指南,我们确定了2025年5月之前发表的67项研究,这些研究检查了74个加权和39个未加权的PGS模型,这些模型与心血管、呼吸、肌肉和脂肪以及/或神经运动性能相关参数有关。我们将身体成分和肌肉适能归为同一类,因为这些参数密切相关。我们的评估强调了与适应度性状有关的关键遗传成分,研究方法的异质性,以及当前PGS模型的局限性。虽然pgs提供了对身体健康遗传结构的见解,但它们的实际应用仍然受到群体特异性、多基因复杂性和环境相互作用的限制。我们讨论了个性化干预的意义和未来的研究方向,以提高PGS对身体健康的预测效用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Human Genetics
Human Genetics 生物-遗传学
CiteScore
10.80
自引率
3.80%
发文量
94
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Human Genetics is a monthly journal publishing original and timely articles on all aspects of human genetics. The Journal particularly welcomes articles in the areas of Behavioral genetics, Bioinformatics, Cancer genetics and genomics, Cytogenetics, Developmental genetics, Disease association studies, Dysmorphology, ELSI (ethical, legal and social issues), Evolutionary genetics, Gene expression, Gene structure and organization, Genetics of complex diseases and epistatic interactions, Genetic epidemiology, Genome biology, Genome structure and organization, Genotype-phenotype relationships, Human Genomics, Immunogenetics and genomics, Linkage analysis and genetic mapping, Methods in Statistical Genetics, Molecular diagnostics, Mutation detection and analysis, Neurogenetics, Physical mapping and Population Genetics. Articles reporting animal models relevant to human biology or disease are also welcome. Preference will be given to those articles which address clinically relevant questions or which provide new insights into human biology. Unless reporting entirely novel and unusual aspects of a topic, clinical case reports, cytogenetic case reports, papers on descriptive population genetics, articles dealing with the frequency of polymorphisms or additional mutations within genes in which numerous lesions have already been described, and papers that report meta-analyses of previously published datasets will normally not be accepted. The Journal typically will not consider for publication manuscripts that report merely the isolation, map position, structure, and tissue expression profile of a gene of unknown function unless the gene is of particular interest or is a candidate gene involved in a human trait or disorder.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书