Yan Li, Junni Du, Chenhui Tian, Aixia Ma, Tiantian Tao, Pingyu Chen
{"title":"Physicians' preferences for direct-acting antivirals in the treatment of chronic hepatitis C: evidence from a discrete choice experiment in China.","authors":"Yan Li, Junni Du, Chenhui Tian, Aixia Ma, Tiantian Tao, Pingyu Chen","doi":"10.1080/14737167.2026.2650162","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Chronic hepatitis C (CHC) remains a major public health challenge in China. Currently, direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) are the mainstay of clinical treatment. This study employed a discrete choice experiment (DCE) to investigate physicians' preferences regarding DAAs for the treatment of CHC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A DCE was designed based on the Chinese Guideline for Comprehensive Clinical Evaluation of Drugs and relevant literature, incorporating seven core attributes: safety, efficacy, economy, innovativeness, appropriateness, accessibility, and affordability. Fourteen choice sets were constructed. Physicians' preferences were analyzed using conditional logit models, from which willingness-to-pay (WTP) and relative importance of attributes were derived. Latent class analysis (LCA) was further applied to explore heterogeneity in physicians' preferences.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data were collected from 159 hospitals across 27 provinces in China, with 185 valid questionnaires included. Efficacy emerged as the most important determinant of prescribing preference, followed by affordability and economy, then accessibility, safety, and appropriateness, while innovativeness was not a significant concern. The LCA identified three distinct latent classes, which were significantly associated with demographic variables.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In China's healthcare setting, beyond the central importance of efficacy, physicians also place great emphasis on affordability and economic value, with marked heterogeneity in preferences depending on background characteristics.</p>","PeriodicalId":12244,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research","volume":" ","pages":"557-566"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14737167.2026.2650162","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Chronic hepatitis C (CHC) remains a major public health challenge in China. Currently, direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) are the mainstay of clinical treatment. This study employed a discrete choice experiment (DCE) to investigate physicians' preferences regarding DAAs for the treatment of CHC.
Methods: A DCE was designed based on the Chinese Guideline for Comprehensive Clinical Evaluation of Drugs and relevant literature, incorporating seven core attributes: safety, efficacy, economy, innovativeness, appropriateness, accessibility, and affordability. Fourteen choice sets were constructed. Physicians' preferences were analyzed using conditional logit models, from which willingness-to-pay (WTP) and relative importance of attributes were derived. Latent class analysis (LCA) was further applied to explore heterogeneity in physicians' preferences.
Results: Data were collected from 159 hospitals across 27 provinces in China, with 185 valid questionnaires included. Efficacy emerged as the most important determinant of prescribing preference, followed by affordability and economy, then accessibility, safety, and appropriateness, while innovativeness was not a significant concern. The LCA identified three distinct latent classes, which were significantly associated with demographic variables.
Conclusions: In China's healthcare setting, beyond the central importance of efficacy, physicians also place great emphasis on affordability and economic value, with marked heterogeneity in preferences depending on background characteristics.
期刊介绍:
Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research (ISSN 1473-7167) provides expert reviews on cost-benefit and pharmacoeconomic issues relating to the clinical use of drugs and therapeutic approaches. Coverage includes pharmacoeconomics and quality-of-life research, therapeutic outcomes, evidence-based medicine and cost-benefit research. All articles are subject to rigorous peer-review.
The journal adopts the unique Expert Review article format, offering a complete overview of current thinking in a key technology area, research or clinical practice, augmented by the following sections:
Expert Opinion – a personal view of the data presented in the article, a discussion on the developments that are likely to be important in the future, and the avenues of research likely to become exciting as further studies yield more detailed results
Article Highlights – an executive summary of the author’s most critical points.