Physicians' preferences for direct-acting antivirals in the treatment of chronic hepatitis C: evidence from a discrete choice experiment in China.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Yan Li, Junni Du, Chenhui Tian, Aixia Ma, Tiantian Tao, Pingyu Chen
{"title":"Physicians' preferences for direct-acting antivirals in the treatment of chronic hepatitis C: evidence from a discrete choice experiment in China.","authors":"Yan Li, Junni Du, Chenhui Tian, Aixia Ma, Tiantian Tao, Pingyu Chen","doi":"10.1080/14737167.2026.2650162","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Chronic hepatitis C (CHC) remains a major public health challenge in China. Currently, direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) are the mainstay of clinical treatment. This study employed a discrete choice experiment (DCE) to investigate physicians' preferences regarding DAAs for the treatment of CHC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A DCE was designed based on the Chinese Guideline for Comprehensive Clinical Evaluation of Drugs and relevant literature, incorporating seven core attributes: safety, efficacy, economy, innovativeness, appropriateness, accessibility, and affordability. Fourteen choice sets were constructed. Physicians' preferences were analyzed using conditional logit models, from which willingness-to-pay (WTP) and relative importance of attributes were derived. Latent class analysis (LCA) was further applied to explore heterogeneity in physicians' preferences.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data were collected from 159 hospitals across 27 provinces in China, with 185 valid questionnaires included. Efficacy emerged as the most important determinant of prescribing preference, followed by affordability and economy, then accessibility, safety, and appropriateness, while innovativeness was not a significant concern. The LCA identified three distinct latent classes, which were significantly associated with demographic variables.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In China's healthcare setting, beyond the central importance of efficacy, physicians also place great emphasis on affordability and economic value, with marked heterogeneity in preferences depending on background characteristics.</p>","PeriodicalId":12244,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research","volume":" ","pages":"557-566"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14737167.2026.2650162","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Chronic hepatitis C (CHC) remains a major public health challenge in China. Currently, direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) are the mainstay of clinical treatment. This study employed a discrete choice experiment (DCE) to investigate physicians' preferences regarding DAAs for the treatment of CHC.

Methods: A DCE was designed based on the Chinese Guideline for Comprehensive Clinical Evaluation of Drugs and relevant literature, incorporating seven core attributes: safety, efficacy, economy, innovativeness, appropriateness, accessibility, and affordability. Fourteen choice sets were constructed. Physicians' preferences were analyzed using conditional logit models, from which willingness-to-pay (WTP) and relative importance of attributes were derived. Latent class analysis (LCA) was further applied to explore heterogeneity in physicians' preferences.

Results: Data were collected from 159 hospitals across 27 provinces in China, with 185 valid questionnaires included. Efficacy emerged as the most important determinant of prescribing preference, followed by affordability and economy, then accessibility, safety, and appropriateness, while innovativeness was not a significant concern. The LCA identified three distinct latent classes, which were significantly associated with demographic variables.

Conclusions: In China's healthcare setting, beyond the central importance of efficacy, physicians also place great emphasis on affordability and economic value, with marked heterogeneity in preferences depending on background characteristics.

慢性丙型肝炎治疗中医生对直接作用抗病毒药物的偏好:来自中国离散选择实验的证据
背景:慢性丙型肝炎(CHC)在中国仍然是一个主要的公共卫生挑战。目前,直接作用抗病毒药物(DAAs)是临床治疗的主流。本研究采用离散选择实验(DCE)来调查医生对DAAs治疗CHC的偏好。方法:根据《中国药物临床综合评价指南》及相关文献,将安全性、有效性、经济性、创新性、适宜性、可及性、可负担性7个核心属性纳入DCE评估体系。共构建了14个选择集。采用条件logit模型对医生的偏好进行分析,从中得出支付意愿(WTP)和属性的相对重要性。应用潜类分析(LCA)进一步探讨医生偏好的异质性。结果:收集了中国27个省份159家医院的数据,共获得185份有效问卷。疗效是处方偏好的最重要决定因素,其次是可负担性和经济性,然后是可及性、安全性和适当性,而创新性则不是重要的考虑因素。LCA确定了三个不同的潜在类别,它们与人口统计学变量显著相关。结论:在中国的医疗环境中,除了疗效的核心重要性外,医生也非常重视可负担性和经济价值,根据背景特征的偏好存在明显的异质性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research
Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
4.30%
发文量
68
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research (ISSN 1473-7167) provides expert reviews on cost-benefit and pharmacoeconomic issues relating to the clinical use of drugs and therapeutic approaches. Coverage includes pharmacoeconomics and quality-of-life research, therapeutic outcomes, evidence-based medicine and cost-benefit research. All articles are subject to rigorous peer-review. The journal adopts the unique Expert Review article format, offering a complete overview of current thinking in a key technology area, research or clinical practice, augmented by the following sections: Expert Opinion – a personal view of the data presented in the article, a discussion on the developments that are likely to be important in the future, and the avenues of research likely to become exciting as further studies yield more detailed results Article Highlights – an executive summary of the author’s most critical points.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书