Balancing Regulations and Patient Needs: A Typology of Nursing Flexibility.

IF 3.2 4区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Nursing Inquiry Pub Date : 2026-04-01 DOI:10.1111/nin.70096
Smadar Weinstein, Dana Yagil
{"title":"Balancing Regulations and Patient Needs: A Typology of Nursing Flexibility.","authors":"Smadar Weinstein, Dana Yagil","doi":"10.1111/nin.70096","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Flexibility lies at the heart of person-centered care, enabling nurses to respond to the particularities of patients' needs, preferences, and circumstances. Yet hospital work unfolds within highly regulated systems designed to ensure safety and consistency, often constraining individualized practice. This tension sometimes positions nurses between organizational regulations and the imperatives of care, a space documented in the literature but still posing important questions about how nurses manage competing demands. This study explores how nurses manage conflicts between institutional rules and patient needs and develops a typology of the strategies they use to do so. Data were generated through semi-structured interviews and shadowing observations in internal medicine, surgical, neurological, and orthopedic wards across four hospitals. Findings show that nurses' strategies align along two axes: procedure orientation-patient orientation and personalization-depersonalization. Nurses moved fluidly among these modes, revealing flexibility as a dynamic practice rather than a fixed trait. The typology offers a conceptual lens for understanding how nurses enact discretion within highly standardized systems. Recognizing these patterned responses can help organizations support professional judgment, creating space for safe, responsive care without undermining institutional integrity.</p>","PeriodicalId":49727,"journal":{"name":"Nursing Inquiry","volume":"33 2","pages":"e70096"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing Inquiry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/nin.70096","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Flexibility lies at the heart of person-centered care, enabling nurses to respond to the particularities of patients' needs, preferences, and circumstances. Yet hospital work unfolds within highly regulated systems designed to ensure safety and consistency, often constraining individualized practice. This tension sometimes positions nurses between organizational regulations and the imperatives of care, a space documented in the literature but still posing important questions about how nurses manage competing demands. This study explores how nurses manage conflicts between institutional rules and patient needs and develops a typology of the strategies they use to do so. Data were generated through semi-structured interviews and shadowing observations in internal medicine, surgical, neurological, and orthopedic wards across four hospitals. Findings show that nurses' strategies align along two axes: procedure orientation-patient orientation and personalization-depersonalization. Nurses moved fluidly among these modes, revealing flexibility as a dynamic practice rather than a fixed trait. The typology offers a conceptual lens for understanding how nurses enact discretion within highly standardized systems. Recognizing these patterned responses can help organizations support professional judgment, creating space for safe, responsive care without undermining institutional integrity.

平衡法规和病人需求:护理灵活性的一种类型。
灵活性是以人为本的护理的核心,使护士能够对患者的特殊需求、偏好和情况作出反应。然而,医院的工作是在高度监管的系统中展开的,这些系统旨在确保安全性和一致性,往往限制了个性化的实践。这种紧张有时会将护士置于组织法规和护理的必要性之间,这是文献中记载的一个空间,但仍然提出了关于护士如何管理竞争需求的重要问题。本研究探讨了护士如何管理制度规则和患者需求之间的冲突,并开发了他们使用的策略类型。数据是通过在四家医院的内科、外科、神经和骨科病房进行半结构化访谈和跟踪观察产生的。研究结果表明,护士的策略沿两个轴对齐:程序导向-患者导向和个性化-去个性化。护士在这些模式之间流动,显示灵活性是一种动态的实践,而不是固定的特征。类型学为理解护士如何在高度标准化的系统中制定自由裁量权提供了一个概念性的视角。认识到这些模式反应可以帮助组织支持专业判断,在不破坏机构完整性的情况下为安全、响应性护理创造空间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nursing Inquiry
Nursing Inquiry 医学-护理
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
13.00%
发文量
61
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Nursing Inquiry aims to stimulate examination of nursing''s current and emerging practices, conditions and contexts within an expanding international community of ideas. The journal aspires to excite thinking and stimulate action toward a preferred future for health and healthcare by encouraging critical reflection and lively debate on matters affecting and influenced by nursing from a range of disciplinary angles, scientific perspectives, analytic approaches, social locations and philosophical positions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书