{"title":"Formalising privacy regulations with bigraphs.","authors":"Ebtihal Althubiti, Blair Archibald, Michele Sevegnani","doi":"10.1007/s10270-025-01293-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>With many governments regulating the handling of user data-the General Data Protection Regulation, the California Consumer Privacy Act, and the Saudi Arabian Personal Data Protection Law-ensuring systems comply with data privacy legislation is of high importance. Checking compliance is a tricky process and often includes many manual elements. We propose that formal methods, that model systems mathematically, can provide strong guarantees to help companies <i>prove</i> their adherence to legislation. To increase usability we advocate a diagrammatic approach, based on bigraphical reactive systems, where privacy experts can explicitly <i>visualise</i> the systems and describe updates, via rewrite rules, that describe system behaviour. The rewrite rules allow flexibility in integrating privacy policies with user-specified systems. We focus on modelling notions of <i>providing consent, withdrawing consent, purpose limitations, the right to access and sharing data with third parties</i>, and define privacy properties that we want to prove within the systems. Properties are expressed using the computation tree logic and proved using model checking. To show the generality of the proposed framework, we apply it to two examples: a bank notification system, inspired by Monzo's privacy policy, and a cloud-based home healthcare system based on the Fitbit app's privacy policy.</p>","PeriodicalId":49507,"journal":{"name":"Software and Systems Modeling","volume":"25 2","pages":"487-513"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12996049/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Software and Systems Modeling","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10270-025-01293-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
With many governments regulating the handling of user data-the General Data Protection Regulation, the California Consumer Privacy Act, and the Saudi Arabian Personal Data Protection Law-ensuring systems comply with data privacy legislation is of high importance. Checking compliance is a tricky process and often includes many manual elements. We propose that formal methods, that model systems mathematically, can provide strong guarantees to help companies prove their adherence to legislation. To increase usability we advocate a diagrammatic approach, based on bigraphical reactive systems, where privacy experts can explicitly visualise the systems and describe updates, via rewrite rules, that describe system behaviour. The rewrite rules allow flexibility in integrating privacy policies with user-specified systems. We focus on modelling notions of providing consent, withdrawing consent, purpose limitations, the right to access and sharing data with third parties, and define privacy properties that we want to prove within the systems. Properties are expressed using the computation tree logic and proved using model checking. To show the generality of the proposed framework, we apply it to two examples: a bank notification system, inspired by Monzo's privacy policy, and a cloud-based home healthcare system based on the Fitbit app's privacy policy.
期刊介绍:
We invite authors to submit papers that discuss and analyze research challenges and experiences pertaining to software and system modeling languages, techniques, tools, practices and other facets. The following are some of the topic areas that are of special interest, but the journal publishes on a wide range of software and systems modeling concerns:
Domain-specific models and modeling standards;
Model-based testing techniques;
Model-based simulation techniques;
Formal syntax and semantics of modeling languages such as the UML;
Rigorous model-based analysis;
Model composition, refinement and transformation;
Software Language Engineering;
Modeling Languages in Science and Engineering;
Language Adaptation and Composition;
Metamodeling techniques;
Measuring quality of models and languages;
Ontological approaches to model engineering;
Generating test and code artifacts from models;
Model synthesis;
Methodology;
Model development tool environments;
Modeling Cyberphysical Systems;
Data intensive modeling;
Derivation of explicit models from data;
Case studies and experience reports with significant modeling lessons learned;
Comparative analyses of modeling languages and techniques;
Scientific assessment of modeling practices