Trifocal femur fracture: Where should one begin? A case report and literature review.

Q4 Medicine
Trauma Case Reports Pub Date : 2026-02-24 eCollection Date: 2026-02-01 DOI:10.1016/j.tcr.2026.101321
Gianluca Cera, Giovanni Longo, Michele Dell'Orfano, Daniele De Meo, Francesco Maria Milella, Roberta Pica, Filippo Laurenti
{"title":"Trifocal femur fracture: Where should one begin? A case report and literature review.","authors":"Gianluca Cera, Giovanni Longo, Michele Dell'Orfano, Daniele De Meo, Francesco Maria Milella, Roberta Pica, Filippo Laurenti","doi":"10.1016/j.tcr.2026.101321","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Ipsilateral, non-contiguous femoral fractures involving the femoral neck, shaft, and distal articular region are extremely rare and typically result from high-energy trauma. Their complex nature and rarity contribute to a lack of consensus regarding optimal surgical management.</p><p><strong>Case report: </strong>We report the case of a 72-year-old male involved in a high-energy motor vehicle accident who sustained a trifocal femoral fracture: an intracapsular femoral neck fracture (AO/OTA 31-B2, Pauwels type 3), a displaced diaphyseal fracture (AO/OTA 32-A2), and a complete intra-articular distal femoral fracture (AO/OTA 33-C2). Initial management included transtibial traction under a Damage Control Orthopaedics (DCO) protocol, followed by definitive fixation 10 days later using a single-stage stepwise surgical approach. Fixation consisted of an antegrade intramedullary nail (providing stabilization of the femoral neck and shaft fractures), 6.5-mm cannulated screws used exclusively for the intra-articular distal femoral fracture, and a LISS plate for the distal metaphyseal component.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Postoperative recovery was uneventful, with radiographic evidence of full fracture union and no signs of post-traumatic osteoarthritis at final follow-up. Clinical recovery was excellent.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This is one of the few reported cases in the literature involving a trifocal femoral fracture with this specific combination. Our surgical strategy allowed absolute stability of the distal articular fracture and relative stability for the shaft and femoral neck. A qualitative literature review revealed no standardized algorithm for implant selection or fixation sequence in such cases. Our experience supports a tailored approach based on fracture pattern, emphasizing the preservation of femoral head vascularity and anatomical reduction of joint surfaces.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Trifocal ipsilateral femoral fractures require individualized surgical planning. The described combination of implants-used here for the first time-proved effective and may serve as a reference in similar complex trauma cases.</p>","PeriodicalId":23291,"journal":{"name":"Trauma Case Reports","volume":"61 ","pages":"101321"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12996269/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trauma Case Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tcr.2026.101321","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Ipsilateral, non-contiguous femoral fractures involving the femoral neck, shaft, and distal articular region are extremely rare and typically result from high-energy trauma. Their complex nature and rarity contribute to a lack of consensus regarding optimal surgical management.

Case report: We report the case of a 72-year-old male involved in a high-energy motor vehicle accident who sustained a trifocal femoral fracture: an intracapsular femoral neck fracture (AO/OTA 31-B2, Pauwels type 3), a displaced diaphyseal fracture (AO/OTA 32-A2), and a complete intra-articular distal femoral fracture (AO/OTA 33-C2). Initial management included transtibial traction under a Damage Control Orthopaedics (DCO) protocol, followed by definitive fixation 10 days later using a single-stage stepwise surgical approach. Fixation consisted of an antegrade intramedullary nail (providing stabilization of the femoral neck and shaft fractures), 6.5-mm cannulated screws used exclusively for the intra-articular distal femoral fracture, and a LISS plate for the distal metaphyseal component.

Results: Postoperative recovery was uneventful, with radiographic evidence of full fracture union and no signs of post-traumatic osteoarthritis at final follow-up. Clinical recovery was excellent.

Discussion: This is one of the few reported cases in the literature involving a trifocal femoral fracture with this specific combination. Our surgical strategy allowed absolute stability of the distal articular fracture and relative stability for the shaft and femoral neck. A qualitative literature review revealed no standardized algorithm for implant selection or fixation sequence in such cases. Our experience supports a tailored approach based on fracture pattern, emphasizing the preservation of femoral head vascularity and anatomical reduction of joint surfaces.

Conclusion: Trifocal ipsilateral femoral fractures require individualized surgical planning. The described combination of implants-used here for the first time-proved effective and may serve as a reference in similar complex trauma cases.

股骨三灶性骨折:从哪里开始?病例报告及文献复习。
简介:累及股骨颈、股骨骨干和远端关节区的同侧非连续股骨骨折极为罕见,通常由高能创伤引起。其复杂性和罕见性导致缺乏关于最佳手术治疗的共识。病例报告:我们报告一名72岁男性在高能机动车事故中发生股骨三局点骨折的病例:股骨颈囊内骨折(AO/OTA 31-B2, Pauwels型3),骨干移位骨折(AO/OTA 32-A2)和完全性股骨远端关节内骨折(AO/OTA 33-C2)。初始治疗包括损伤控制骨科(DCO)方案下的经胫骨牵引,10天后采用单阶段逐步手术入路进行最终固定。固定包括顺行髓内钉(提供股骨颈和骨干骨折的稳定),6.5 mm空心螺钉专门用于股骨远端关节内骨折,LISS钢板用于远端干骺端部件。结果:术后恢复顺利,x线片显示骨折完全愈合,最后随访时无创伤后骨关节炎迹象。临床恢复良好。讨论:这是文献中为数不多的三局灶性股骨骨折合并这种特殊组合的病例之一。我们的手术策略保证了远端关节骨折的绝对稳定性和椎体和股骨颈的相对稳定性。一项定性文献综述显示,在这种情况下,没有标准化的种植体选择或固定顺序算法。我们的经验支持根据骨折类型定制入路,强调保留股骨头血管和关节面解剖复位。结论:股骨三局灶性同侧骨折需要个体化手术方案。本文首次采用的这种植入物组合被证明是有效的,可以作为类似复杂创伤病例的参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Trauma Case Reports
Trauma Case Reports Medicine-Emergency Medicine
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
131
审稿时长
26 weeks
期刊介绍: Trauma Case Reports is the only open access, online journal dedicated to the publication of case reports in all aspects of trauma care and accident surgery. Case reports on all aspects of trauma management, surgical procedures for all tissues, resuscitation, anaesthesia and trauma and tissue healing will be considered for publication by the international editorial team and will be subject to peer review. Bringing together these cases from an international authorship will shed light on surgical problems and help in their effective resolution.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书