Detection of Anastomotic Leaks Following Esophagectomy with Cervical Anastomosis Using Drain Fluid Amylase Testing: A Retrospective Study in Taiwan.

IF 1.5 Q4 Medicine
Journal of Chest Surgery Pub Date : 2026-07-05 Epub Date: 2026-03-20 DOI:10.5090/jcs.25.108
Ying-Che Ting, Ling-I Chien, Chia Liu, Yi-Ying Lee, Chien-Sheng Huang, Yu-Chung Wu, Po-Kuei Hsu
{"title":"Detection of Anastomotic Leaks Following Esophagectomy with Cervical Anastomosis Using Drain Fluid Amylase Testing: A Retrospective Study in Taiwan.","authors":"Ying-Che Ting, Ling-I Chien, Chia Liu, Yi-Ying Lee, Chien-Sheng Huang, Yu-Chung Wu, Po-Kuei Hsu","doi":"10.5090/jcs.25.108","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Anastomotic leak at the cervical anastomosis following esophagectomy remains a significant problem. However, diagnostic accuracy for this condition is limited, and interpretation varies. This study aimed to share our institution's experience regarding the diagnostic value of esophagram and drain fluid amylase testing.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively reviewed patients with esophageal cancer who underwent McKeown esophagectomy. Esophagram was scheduled on postoperative day (POD) 7. Drain fluid amylase levels were measured twice, on POD 3 and POD 7. Diagnostic criteria were established based on the values measured at these time points and the relationship between them.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 103 patients were eligible for evaluation. Of these, 48 underwent drain fluid amylase testing, 67 underwent esophagram, and 12 received both examinations. The sensitivity and specificity of esophagram for detecting anastomotic leak were 28.6% and 95%, respectively. The positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and diagnostic accuracy were 40.0%, 91.9%, and 88.1%, respectively. Among patients who underwent drain fluid amylase testing, the criteria for detecting leaks were defined as follows: (1) an increasing trend (i.e., an amylase level higher on POD 7 than on POD 3) and (2) an amylase level >80 IU/L on POD 7. The sensitivity and specificity of these criteria were 75% and 96.5%, respectively, while the positive and negative predictive values were 75% and 96.5%. The diagnostic accuracy was 93.9%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Compared with esophagram, drain fluid amylase testing is easier to perform and may represent a more accurate method for predicting anastomotic leak.</p>","PeriodicalId":34499,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Chest Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"165-174"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13351375/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Chest Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5090/jcs.25.108","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Anastomotic leak at the cervical anastomosis following esophagectomy remains a significant problem. However, diagnostic accuracy for this condition is limited, and interpretation varies. This study aimed to share our institution's experience regarding the diagnostic value of esophagram and drain fluid amylase testing.

Methods: We retrospectively reviewed patients with esophageal cancer who underwent McKeown esophagectomy. Esophagram was scheduled on postoperative day (POD) 7. Drain fluid amylase levels were measured twice, on POD 3 and POD 7. Diagnostic criteria were established based on the values measured at these time points and the relationship between them.

Results: Overall, 103 patients were eligible for evaluation. Of these, 48 underwent drain fluid amylase testing, 67 underwent esophagram, and 12 received both examinations. The sensitivity and specificity of esophagram for detecting anastomotic leak were 28.6% and 95%, respectively. The positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and diagnostic accuracy were 40.0%, 91.9%, and 88.1%, respectively. Among patients who underwent drain fluid amylase testing, the criteria for detecting leaks were defined as follows: (1) an increasing trend (i.e., an amylase level higher on POD 7 than on POD 3) and (2) an amylase level >80 IU/L on POD 7. The sensitivity and specificity of these criteria were 75% and 96.5%, respectively, while the positive and negative predictive values were 75% and 96.5%. The diagnostic accuracy was 93.9%.

Conclusion: Compared with esophagram, drain fluid amylase testing is easier to perform and may represent a more accurate method for predicting anastomotic leak.

用引流液淀粉酶检测食管吻合术后吻合口漏:台湾回顾性研究。
背景:食管切除术后颈吻合口吻合口瘘仍然是一个重要的问题。然而,对这种情况的诊断准确性是有限的,解释也各不相同。本研究旨在分享我院在食道造影及引流液淀粉酶检测诊断价值方面的经验。方法:对食管癌行McKeown食管切除术的患者进行回顾性分析。术后第7天进行食管造影(POD)。排液淀粉酶水平测定两次,在POD 3和POD 7上。根据在这些时间点测量的值及其之间的关系建立诊断标准。结果:总体而言,103例患者符合评估条件。其中48例进行了引流液淀粉酶检测,67例进行了食管造影,12例同时进行了两项检查。食管造影检测吻合口瘘的敏感性为28.6%,特异性为95%。阳性预测值为40.0%,阴性预测值为91.9%,诊断准确率为88.1%。在接受引流液淀粉酶检测的患者中,检测泄漏的标准定义为:(1)有增加趋势(即POD 7淀粉酶水平高于POD 3); (2) POD 7淀粉酶水平低于80 IU/L。这些标准的敏感性和特异性分别为75%和96.5%,阳性预测值和阴性预测值分别为75%和96.5%。诊断正确率为93.9%。结论:与食管造影相比,引流液淀粉酶检测更容易进行,可能是一种更准确预测吻合口漏的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Chest Surgery
Journal of Chest Surgery Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
76
审稿时长
7 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书