Medical decluttering: what it is and why it is important.

IF 4.3 4区 医学 0 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Panminerva medica Pub Date : 2026-06-01 Epub Date: 2026-03-20 DOI:10.23736/S0031-0808.26.05427-3
Anna Sirignano, Francesca Murri, Ludovica Ruggiu, Michela Cece, Giuseppe Biondi-Zoccai, Massimo Boni, Francesco Versaci
{"title":"Medical decluttering: what it is and why it is important.","authors":"Anna Sirignano, Francesca Murri, Ludovica Ruggiu, Michela Cece, Giuseppe Biondi-Zoccai, Massimo Boni, Francesco Versaci","doi":"10.23736/S0031-0808.26.05427-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Medical decluttering is a pragmatic, ethics-anchored approach to reduce low-value tests, treatments, documentation, and digital noise while preserving safety, dignity, and outcomes that matter to patients and clinicians. It reframes improvement from \"doing less\" to \"doing better,\" prioritizing value delivered per unit effort and transparent measurement of treatment burden, workload, and harms. We outline why clutter proliferates - decision fatigue, cognitive biases, overdiagnosis, incidental findings, and bureaucratic drift - and how these forces fuel cascades, moral distress, and lost trust. We propose a five-step cycle-Scan, Sort, Select, Safeguard, Sustain-that operationalizes decluttering across patient, team, and system levels through category-first review, explicit thresholds, safety nets, and time-bounded reassessment. Clinical applications include deprescribing with monitored tapers, appropriateness-based testing and screening, pathway redesign to shorten time-to-decision, and courteous refusal scripts paired with contingency plans. Professional practices emphasize agenda setting, message windowing, checklists and dashboards for cognitive offloading, role clarity, digital minimalism, and indication-based telemedicine. Implementation relies on co-designed indicators, governance of order sets and alerts, audit-and-feedback, and rapid learning cycles that balance overuse and underuse while safeguarding equity. By aligning ethics, evidence, and attention, medical decluttering offers a coherent method to reduce cascades, restore focus, and make care simpler, safer, and more humane in internal medicine practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":19851,"journal":{"name":"Panminerva medica","volume":" ","pages":"83-91"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Panminerva medica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0031-0808.26.05427-3","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"0","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Medical decluttering is a pragmatic, ethics-anchored approach to reduce low-value tests, treatments, documentation, and digital noise while preserving safety, dignity, and outcomes that matter to patients and clinicians. It reframes improvement from "doing less" to "doing better," prioritizing value delivered per unit effort and transparent measurement of treatment burden, workload, and harms. We outline why clutter proliferates - decision fatigue, cognitive biases, overdiagnosis, incidental findings, and bureaucratic drift - and how these forces fuel cascades, moral distress, and lost trust. We propose a five-step cycle-Scan, Sort, Select, Safeguard, Sustain-that operationalizes decluttering across patient, team, and system levels through category-first review, explicit thresholds, safety nets, and time-bounded reassessment. Clinical applications include deprescribing with monitored tapers, appropriateness-based testing and screening, pathway redesign to shorten time-to-decision, and courteous refusal scripts paired with contingency plans. Professional practices emphasize agenda setting, message windowing, checklists and dashboards for cognitive offloading, role clarity, digital minimalism, and indication-based telemedicine. Implementation relies on co-designed indicators, governance of order sets and alerts, audit-and-feedback, and rapid learning cycles that balance overuse and underuse while safeguarding equity. By aligning ethics, evidence, and attention, medical decluttering offers a coherent method to reduce cascades, restore focus, and make care simpler, safer, and more humane in internal medicine practice.

医学整理:它是什么,为什么它很重要。
医疗整理是一种务实的、以道德为基础的方法,可以减少低价值的测试、治疗、文件和数字噪音,同时保持对患者和临床医生重要的安全、尊严和结果。它将改进从“做得更少”重新定义为“做得更好”,优先考虑单位努力交付的价值,并透明地衡量治疗负担、工作量和危害。我们概述了为什么混乱会扩散——决策疲劳、认知偏差、过度诊断、偶然发现和官僚主义漂移——以及这些力量如何加剧级联、道德困境和失去信任。我们提出了一个五步循环——扫描、排序、选择、保护、维持——通过类别优先的审查、明确的阈值、安全网和有时限的重新评估,在患者、团队和系统层面上实施整理。临床应用包括使用监控的锥形处方,基于适当的测试和筛选,重新设计路径以缩短决策时间,以及与应急计划相匹配的礼貌拒绝脚本。专业实践强调议程设置、信息窗口、检查清单和仪表板,以实现认知卸载、角色清晰、数字极简主义和基于适应症的远程医疗。实施依赖于共同设计的指标、订单集和警报的治理、审计和反馈以及快速的学习周期,以平衡过度使用和未充分使用,同时维护公平。通过协调伦理、证据和关注,医学整理提供了一种连贯的方法来减少级联反应,恢复焦点,并使内科实践中的护理更简单、更安全、更人性化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Panminerva medica
Panminerva medica 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
2.30%
发文量
199
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Panminerva Medica publishes scientific papers on internal medicine. Manuscripts may be submitted in the form of editorials, original articles, review articles, case reports, special articles, letters to the Editor and guidelines. The journal aims to provide its readers with papers of the highest quality and impact through a process of careful peer review and editorial work. Duties and responsibilities of all the subjects involved in the editorial process are summarized at Publication ethics. Manuscripts are expected to comply with the instructions to authors which conform to the Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Editors by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书