N-Acetylcysteine Dose and Treatment Duration in High-Risk Acetaminophen Ingestions Treated Within Eight Hours: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 TOXICOLOGY
Journal of Medical Toxicology Pub Date : 2026-04-01 Epub Date: 2026-03-19 DOI:10.1007/s13181-026-01129-5
C James Watson, Michael D Simpson, Nishita Saraiya, Christopher A Wilkosz, Michael B Yu, Michele M Burns, Mark J Neavyn, Karen E Simone, Tania D Strout
{"title":"N-Acetylcysteine Dose and Treatment Duration in High-Risk Acetaminophen Ingestions Treated Within Eight Hours: A Retrospective Cohort Study.","authors":"C James Watson, Michael D Simpson, Nishita Saraiya, Christopher A Wilkosz, Michael B Yu, Michele M Burns, Mark J Neavyn, Karen E Simone, Tania D Strout","doi":"10.1007/s13181-026-01129-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>INTRODUCTION: Toxicologists may use high dose n-acetylcysteine (HD-NAC) for early-treated high-risk acetaminophen ingestions (EHRAI) given concerns over standard NAC (S-NAC) dosing’s efficacy. We utilize the novel, clinically relevant outcome of mean additional 16-hour NAC maintenance infusions (NMI) to evaluate differences in treatment duration for EHRAI patients treated with S-NAC versus HD-NAC. METHODS: Retrospective multistate poison center study from 1/1/2019-7/4/2024 of patients ≥ 13-years-old who were treated with S-NAC or HD-NAC within eight hours of a high-risk acetaminophen ingestion. The primary outcome was mean additional NMI. Secondary outcomes were NAC infusion duration, hepatotoxicity, coagulopathy, transplant, and death. Sensitivity analyses evaluated for robustness of findings. RESULTS: Of 127 included cases, 52.0% (66/127) received HD-NAC. 7.1% (9/127) had anti-peristaltic co-ingestions. HD-NAC cases received more fomepizole (23.1% versus 1.6%; difference 21.1%). Acetaminophen concentrations controlled for time since ingestion were similar (mean acetaminophen ratio for HD-NAC: 2.7, IQR: 2.3, 3.3 versus S-NAC: 2.4, IQR: 2.2, 2.7; difference − 0.3). 26.0% (33/127) received NMI solely for residual detectable serum acetaminophen. There was no difference in mean additional NMI (HD-NAC: 0.53 versus S-NAC: 0.38; p = 0.240). Median NAC infusion durations were equal across groups (21.0; IQR: 21.0, 37.0; difference 0.0) (p = 0.137). One patient per group developed hepatotoxicity; there were no transplants or deaths. Sensitivity analyses yielded similar results. CONCLUSIONS: We found no difference in mean NMI for EHRAI based on NAC dose. These findings support additional NMI as an objective, common, clinically relevant outcome for acetaminophen toxicity research. </p>","PeriodicalId":16429,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Toxicology","volume":" ","pages":"253-262"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13076740/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13181-026-01129-5","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"TOXICOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Toxicologists may use high dose n-acetylcysteine (HD-NAC) for early-treated high-risk acetaminophen ingestions (EHRAI) given concerns over standard NAC (S-NAC) dosing’s efficacy. We utilize the novel, clinically relevant outcome of mean additional 16-hour NAC maintenance infusions (NMI) to evaluate differences in treatment duration for EHRAI patients treated with S-NAC versus HD-NAC. METHODS: Retrospective multistate poison center study from 1/1/2019-7/4/2024 of patients ≥ 13-years-old who were treated with S-NAC or HD-NAC within eight hours of a high-risk acetaminophen ingestion. The primary outcome was mean additional NMI. Secondary outcomes were NAC infusion duration, hepatotoxicity, coagulopathy, transplant, and death. Sensitivity analyses evaluated for robustness of findings. RESULTS: Of 127 included cases, 52.0% (66/127) received HD-NAC. 7.1% (9/127) had anti-peristaltic co-ingestions. HD-NAC cases received more fomepizole (23.1% versus 1.6%; difference 21.1%). Acetaminophen concentrations controlled for time since ingestion were similar (mean acetaminophen ratio for HD-NAC: 2.7, IQR: 2.3, 3.3 versus S-NAC: 2.4, IQR: 2.2, 2.7; difference − 0.3). 26.0% (33/127) received NMI solely for residual detectable serum acetaminophen. There was no difference in mean additional NMI (HD-NAC: 0.53 versus S-NAC: 0.38; p = 0.240). Median NAC infusion durations were equal across groups (21.0; IQR: 21.0, 37.0; difference 0.0) (p = 0.137). One patient per group developed hepatotoxicity; there were no transplants or deaths. Sensitivity analyses yielded similar results. CONCLUSIONS: We found no difference in mean NMI for EHRAI based on NAC dose. These findings support additional NMI as an objective, common, clinically relevant outcome for acetaminophen toxicity research.

n -乙酰半胱氨酸剂量和8小时内对乙酰氨基酚摄入的治疗时间:一项回顾性队列研究。
毒理学家可能会使用高剂量的n-乙酰半胱氨酸(HD-NAC)来治疗早期治疗的高风险对乙酰氨基酚摄入(EHRAI),考虑到标准NAC (S-NAC)剂量的疗效。我们利用新的、临床相关的平均额外16小时NAC维持输注(NMI)的结果来评估S-NAC与HD-NAC治疗EHRAI患者治疗时间的差异。方法:对2019年1月1日至2024年7月4日期间,在高风险对乙酰氨基酚摄入后8小时内接受S-NAC或HD-NAC治疗的≥13岁患者进行回顾性多州中毒中心研究。主要结局为平均额外NMI。次要结局是NAC输注时间、肝毒性、凝血功能障碍、移植和死亡。敏感性分析评估结果的稳健性。结果:127例纳入病例中,52.0%(66/127)接受HD-NAC治疗。7.1%(9/127)存在抗蠕动性共食。HD-NAC患者使用更多的氟美唑(23.1%比1.6%,差21.1%)。摄入后对乙酰氨基酚的控制浓度相似(HD-NAC的平均对乙酰氨基酚比为2.7,IQR为2.3,3.3,S-NAC为2.4,IQR为2.2,2.7,差异为−0.3)。26.0%(33/127)的患者仅因血清对乙酰氨基酚残留检测而接受NMI治疗。平均额外NMI无差异(HD-NAC: 0.53 vs S-NAC: 0.38; p = 0.240)。各组NAC输注时间中位数相等(21.0;IQR: 21.0, 37.0;差值0.0)(p = 0.137)。每组1例患者出现肝毒性;没有移植,也没有死亡。敏感性分析得出了类似的结果。结论:我们发现基于NAC剂量的EHRAI的平均NMI没有差异。这些发现支持额外的NMI作为对乙酰氨基酚毒性研究的客观、常见、临床相关的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
10.30%
发文量
46
期刊介绍: Journal of Medical Toxicology (JMT) is a peer-reviewed medical journal dedicated to advances in clinical toxicology, focusing on the diagnosis, management, and prevention of poisoning and other adverse health effects resulting from medications, chemicals, occupational and environmental substances, and biological hazards. As the official journal of the American College of Medical Toxicology (ACMT), JMT is managed by an editorial board of clinicians as well as scientists and thus publishes research that is relevant to medical toxicologists, emergency physicians, critical care specialists, pediatricians, pre-hospital providers, occupational physicians, substance abuse experts, veterinary toxicologists, and policy makers.       JMT articles generate considerable interest in the lay media, with 2016 JMT articles cited by various social media sites, the Boston Globe, and the Washington Post among others.     For questions or comments about the journal, please contact jmtinfo@acmt.net.    For questions or comments about the journal, please contact jmtinfo@acmt.net.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书