Can we define the clinical variables predicting T0 after neoadjuvant systemic therapy in bladder cancer?

IF 3.5 Q3 Medicine
Angelo Porreca , Filippo Marino , Davide De Marchi , Marco Giampaoli , Daniele D'Agostino , Antonio Amodeo , Paolo Corsi , Francesco Claps , Luca Di Gianfrancesco
{"title":"Can we define the clinical variables predicting T0 after neoadjuvant systemic therapy in bladder cancer?","authors":"Angelo Porreca ,&nbsp;Filippo Marino ,&nbsp;Davide De Marchi ,&nbsp;Marco Giampaoli ,&nbsp;Daniele D'Agostino ,&nbsp;Antonio Amodeo ,&nbsp;Paolo Corsi ,&nbsp;Francesco Claps ,&nbsp;Luca Di Gianfrancesco","doi":"10.1016/j.ctarc.2026.101181","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) followed by radical cystectomy is standard for muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC), yet complete pathological response (ypT0) occurs in only a minority of patients. Its clinical and temporal predictors remain poorly defined, limiting optimized patient selection and treatment timing.</div></div><div><h3>Patients and Methods</h3><div>We retrospectively analyzed 35 consecutive patients with MIBC (≤cN1M0) who achieved ypT0 after NAC followed by robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) and compared them with 70 consecutive patients with residual disease (≥ypT1) treated at the same institution. Descriptive analyses were performed, followed by multivariable multinomial logistic regression to identify independent clinical and treatment-timing predictors of ypT0.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Early initiation of NAC within one month of diagnosis (p=0.004), completion of chemotherapy within two months (p=0.003), completion of all planned cycles (p=0.02), favorable clinical restaging prior to RARC (p&lt;0.001), and surgery within an optimal post-chemotherapy recovery window (p=0.01) were significantly associated with ypT0. On multivariable analysis, independent predictors of ypT0 included age &lt;70 years (OR=10.5), early treatment initiation (OR=51.1), timely completion of NAC (OR=25.5), completion of all cycles (OR=44.4), surgery within the optimal recovery interval (OR=19.1), total treatment-to-surgery interval &lt;6 months (OR=35.6), and lower tumor stage at restaging (OR=9.34).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>This study identified independent clinical and temporal predictors of complete pathological response following NAC and RARC for MIBC. Modifiable timing-related factors—including early treatment initiation, chemotherapy completion, and optimized surgical scheduling—were key to achieving ypT0, supporting improved patient selection and coordinated perioperative care in future studies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":9507,"journal":{"name":"Cancer treatment and research communications","volume":"47 ","pages":"Article 101181"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer treatment and research communications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468294226000924","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) followed by radical cystectomy is standard for muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC), yet complete pathological response (ypT0) occurs in only a minority of patients. Its clinical and temporal predictors remain poorly defined, limiting optimized patient selection and treatment timing.

Patients and Methods

We retrospectively analyzed 35 consecutive patients with MIBC (≤cN1M0) who achieved ypT0 after NAC followed by robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) and compared them with 70 consecutive patients with residual disease (≥ypT1) treated at the same institution. Descriptive analyses were performed, followed by multivariable multinomial logistic regression to identify independent clinical and treatment-timing predictors of ypT0.

Results

Early initiation of NAC within one month of diagnosis (p=0.004), completion of chemotherapy within two months (p=0.003), completion of all planned cycles (p=0.02), favorable clinical restaging prior to RARC (p<0.001), and surgery within an optimal post-chemotherapy recovery window (p=0.01) were significantly associated with ypT0. On multivariable analysis, independent predictors of ypT0 included age <70 years (OR=10.5), early treatment initiation (OR=51.1), timely completion of NAC (OR=25.5), completion of all cycles (OR=44.4), surgery within the optimal recovery interval (OR=19.1), total treatment-to-surgery interval <6 months (OR=35.6), and lower tumor stage at restaging (OR=9.34).

Conclusions

This study identified independent clinical and temporal predictors of complete pathological response following NAC and RARC for MIBC. Modifiable timing-related factors—including early treatment initiation, chemotherapy completion, and optimized surgical scheduling—were key to achieving ypT0, supporting improved patient selection and coordinated perioperative care in future studies.
我们能否确定预测膀胱癌新辅助全身治疗后T0的临床变量?
新辅助化疗(NAC)加根治性膀胱切除术是肌肉浸润性膀胱癌(MIBC)的标准治疗方法,但完全病理反应(ypT0)仅发生在少数患者中。其临床和时间预测仍然不明确,限制了优化患者选择和治疗时机。患者和方法:我们回顾性分析了35例连续的MIBC(≤cN1M0)患者,这些患者在NAC和机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术(RARC)后达到了ypT0,并将其与同一机构连续治疗的70例残余疾病(≥ypT1)患者进行了比较。进行描述性分析,然后进行多变量多项逻辑回归,以确定ypT0的独立临床和治疗时间预测因子。结果:诊断1个月内早期开始NAC (p=0.004), 2个月内完成化疗(p=0.003),完成所有计划周期(p=0.02),在RARC之前进行良好的临床再分期(p结论:本研究确定了NAC和RARC治疗MIBC后完全病理反应的独立临床和时间预测因子。可调整的时间相关因素-包括早期治疗开始,化疗完成和优化手术计划-是实现ypT0的关键,支持在未来研究中改进患者选择和协调围手术期护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
148
审稿时长
56 days
期刊介绍: Cancer Treatment and Research Communications is an international peer-reviewed publication dedicated to providing comprehensive basic, translational, and clinical oncology research. The journal is devoted to articles on detection, diagnosis, prevention, policy, and treatment of cancer and provides a global forum for the nurturing and development of future generations of oncology scientists. Cancer Treatment and Research Communications publishes comprehensive reviews and original studies describing various aspects of basic through clinical research of all tumor types. The journal also accepts clinical studies in oncology, with an emphasis on prospective early phase clinical trials. Specific areas of interest include basic, translational, and clinical research and mechanistic approaches; cancer biology; molecular carcinogenesis; genetics and genomics; stem cell and developmental biology; immunology; molecular and cellular oncology; systems biology; drug sensitivity and resistance; gene and antisense therapy; pathology, markers, and prognostic indicators; chemoprevention strategies; multimodality therapy; cancer policy; and integration of various approaches. Our mission is to be the premier source of relevant information through promoting excellence in research and facilitating the timely translation of that science to health care and clinical practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书