Which Criteria Determine Return-to-Play Decisions Following Hip and Groin Injuries in Soccer Players: A Scoping Review.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 REHABILITATION
Journal of Sport Rehabilitation Pub Date : 2026-03-17 Print Date: 2026-08-01 DOI:10.1123/jsr.2025-0167
Afxentios Kekelekis, Paolo Perna, Marco Beato
{"title":"Which Criteria Determine Return-to-Play Decisions Following Hip and Groin Injuries in Soccer Players: A Scoping Review.","authors":"Afxentios Kekelekis, Paolo Perna, Marco Beato","doi":"10.1123/jsr.2025-0167","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Return to play (RTP) following hip and groin injuries in soccer remains a complex and high-stakes component of athlete management. These injuries account for a substantial proportion of time-loss episodes and are characterized by high recurrence rates and variable recovery timelines. Despite their prevalence, there is currently no standardized or validated framework for RTP decision making, and applied criteria vary considerably across clinical and sport-performance settings.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To identify, categorize, and synthesize the criteria used to guide RTP decisions following hip and groin injuries in soccer players and to evaluate their implementation across clinical, functional, and sport-specific domains.</p><p><strong>Evidence acquisition: </strong>A comprehensive search was conducted across PubMed, Scopus, and SPORTDiscus databases from 2003 to September 2025, limited to English-language peer-reviewed publications. Studies were eligible if they investigated or described RTP criteria in soccer players recovering from hip and/or groin injuries, regardless of competitive level. Two reviewers independently performed screening, selection, and data extraction using the Rayyan web platform. The protocol was preregistered on the Open Science Framework (osf.io/8kzq3).</p><p><strong>Evidence synthesis: </strong>Twelve studies met the inclusion criteria. Return-to-play criteria were organized into 3 domains: (1) clinical, (2) functional, and (3) sport-specific/on-field criteria. Recent evidence highlights a paradigm shift from symptom- to capacity-based RTP frameworks integrating objective strength testing, neuromuscular control, and GPS-derived workload replication. However, standardized thresholds and progression sequences remain undefined.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Return-to-play decision making after hip and groin injuries in soccer is inherently multidimensional. The most defensible approach combines clinical recovery, functional capacity, and sport-specific readiness verified by objective and reproducible benchmarks. The development of standardized, criterion-based, and sex-inclusive RTP frameworks-integrating physiological, biomechanical, and psychological domains-will enhance the accuracy, safety, and transparency of return-to-performance management.</p>","PeriodicalId":50041,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sport Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"459-473"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Sport Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1123/jsr.2025-0167","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/8/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context: Return to play (RTP) following hip and groin injuries in soccer remains a complex and high-stakes component of athlete management. These injuries account for a substantial proportion of time-loss episodes and are characterized by high recurrence rates and variable recovery timelines. Despite their prevalence, there is currently no standardized or validated framework for RTP decision making, and applied criteria vary considerably across clinical and sport-performance settings.

Objectives: To identify, categorize, and synthesize the criteria used to guide RTP decisions following hip and groin injuries in soccer players and to evaluate their implementation across clinical, functional, and sport-specific domains.

Evidence acquisition: A comprehensive search was conducted across PubMed, Scopus, and SPORTDiscus databases from 2003 to September 2025, limited to English-language peer-reviewed publications. Studies were eligible if they investigated or described RTP criteria in soccer players recovering from hip and/or groin injuries, regardless of competitive level. Two reviewers independently performed screening, selection, and data extraction using the Rayyan web platform. The protocol was preregistered on the Open Science Framework (osf.io/8kzq3).

Evidence synthesis: Twelve studies met the inclusion criteria. Return-to-play criteria were organized into 3 domains: (1) clinical, (2) functional, and (3) sport-specific/on-field criteria. Recent evidence highlights a paradigm shift from symptom- to capacity-based RTP frameworks integrating objective strength testing, neuromuscular control, and GPS-derived workload replication. However, standardized thresholds and progression sequences remain undefined.

Conclusions: Return-to-play decision making after hip and groin injuries in soccer is inherently multidimensional. The most defensible approach combines clinical recovery, functional capacity, and sport-specific readiness verified by objective and reproducible benchmarks. The development of standardized, criterion-based, and sex-inclusive RTP frameworks-integrating physiological, biomechanical, and psychological domains-will enhance the accuracy, safety, and transparency of return-to-performance management.

哪些标准决定足球运动员髋关节和腹股沟损伤后的恢复决定:范围审查。
背景:足球运动员髋关节和腹股沟损伤后的恢复(RTP)仍然是运动员管理中一个复杂和高风险的组成部分。这些损伤占时间损失发作的很大比例,其特点是高复发率和可变的恢复时间。尽管RTP普遍存在,但目前还没有标准化或有效的RTP决策框架,并且在临床和运动表现设置中应用的标准差异很大。目的:识别、分类和综合用于指导足球运动员髋关节和腹股沟损伤后RTP决策的标准,并评估其在临床、功能和运动特定领域的实施情况。证据获取:从2003年到2025年9月,对PubMed、Scopus和SPORTDiscus数据库进行了全面的检索,仅限于英语同行评议的出版物。如果他们调查或描述了从髋关节和/或腹股沟受伤恢复的足球运动员的RTP标准,无论其竞技水平如何,研究都是合格的。两名审稿人使用Rayyan网络平台独立进行筛选、选择和数据提取。该协议已在开放科学框架(osf.io/8kzq3)上预注册。证据综合:12项研究符合纳入标准。恢复比赛的标准分为3个方面:(1)临床,(2)功能,和(3)运动特定/现场标准。最近的证据强调了从症状到基于能力的RTP框架的范式转变,该框架整合了客观力量测试、神经肌肉控制和gps衍生的工作量复制。然而,标准化的阈值和进展顺序仍未定义。结论:足球运动员髋关节和腹股沟损伤后的恢复决策本质上是多维的。最站得住的方法是结合临床恢复、功能能力和运动准备,通过客观和可重复的基准验证。标准化的、基于标准的、性别包容的RTP框架的发展——整合了生理、生物力学和心理领域——将提高绩效回归管理的准确性、安全性和透明度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Sport Rehabilitation
Journal of Sport Rehabilitation 医学-康复医学
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
5.90%
发文量
143
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Sport Rehabilitation (JSR) is your source for the latest peer-reviewed research in the field of sport rehabilitation. All members of the sports-medicine team will benefit from the wealth of important information in each issue. JSR is completely devoted to the rehabilitation of sport and exercise injuries, regardless of the age, gender, sport ability, level of fitness, or health status of the participant. JSR publishes peer-reviewed original research, systematic reviews/meta-analyses, critically appraised topics (CATs), case studies/series, and technical reports that directly affect the management and rehabilitation of injuries incurred during sport-related activities, irrespective of the individual’s age, gender, sport ability, level of fitness, or health status. The journal is intended to provide an international, multidisciplinary forum to serve the needs of all members of the sports medicine team, including athletic trainers/therapists, sport physical therapists/physiotherapists, sports medicine physicians, and other health care and medical professionals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书