Ignacio Fernández Lozano, Joaquín Fernández de la Concha, Javier Ramos Maqueda, Nicasio Pérez Castellano, Rafael Salguero Bodes, F Javier García-Fernández, Juan Benezet Mazuecos, Javier Jiménez Candil, Tomás Datino, Sem Briongos Figuero, Javier Paniagua Olmedillas, Miguel Nicolás Font de la Fuente, Juan López-Dóriga Costales, Sarai Paz Fernández, Vicente Copoví Lucas
{"title":"Short-Term Arrhythmia Prediction Using AI Based on Daily Data From Implantable Devices: Multicenter Prospective Observational Study.","authors":"Ignacio Fernández Lozano, Joaquín Fernández de la Concha, Javier Ramos Maqueda, Nicasio Pérez Castellano, Rafael Salguero Bodes, F Javier García-Fernández, Juan Benezet Mazuecos, Javier Jiménez Candil, Tomás Datino, Sem Briongos Figuero, Javier Paniagua Olmedillas, Miguel Nicolás Font de la Fuente, Juan López-Dóriga Costales, Sarai Paz Fernández, Vicente Copoví Lucas","doi":"10.2196/85841","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Predictive medicine relies on algorithms to determine clinical treatments tailored to each patient's individual characteristics. Predictive models based on artificial intelligence have shown promise in identifying atrial fibrillation episodes; however, they rarely focus on short-term dynamic prediction.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the use of an artificial intelligence model and remote monitoring data extracted from pacemaker devices to predict the onset or worsening of arrhythmias in the short term.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a multicenter prospective observational study in which data from 314 patients were analyzed. A total of 65,243 data sequences were collected, of which 55,532 (85.1%) were used to train the algorithm. This model used 31-day records to predict whether the number of arrhythmic episodes would increase, decrease, or remain the same in the following 14 days.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The sensitivity and specificity of the generated predictions were calculated from 9711 prediction-observation pairs. The global sensitivity was 66.4% (95% CI 64.3%-68.3%), and specificity was 77.4% (95% CI 76.4%-78.4%). For patients with baseline arrhythmia, sensitivity was 76.8% (95% CI 74.6%-78.8%), and specificity was 39.6% (95% CI 35.8%-43.5%). The prediction for patients with no baseline arrhythmia showed a sensitivity of 39% (95% CI 35.1%-43%) and a specificity of 81% (95% CI 80.0%-81.9%). The analysis for the patient subgroup without history of atrial fibrillation (232/314, 73.9%) yielded a 69% sensitivity (95% CI 66.5%-71.5%) and an 80% specificity (95% CI 79.3%-81.3%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This model was capable of predicting short-term increases or decreases in arrhythmic episodes with reasonable sensitivity and specificity using data collected through remote monitoring of implantable devices. The model's performance is expected to improve progressively as more data samples become available, including demographic data and clinical records.</p>","PeriodicalId":14706,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Cardio","volume":"10 ","pages":"e85841"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12998600/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR Cardio","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/85841","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Predictive medicine relies on algorithms to determine clinical treatments tailored to each patient's individual characteristics. Predictive models based on artificial intelligence have shown promise in identifying atrial fibrillation episodes; however, they rarely focus on short-term dynamic prediction.
Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the use of an artificial intelligence model and remote monitoring data extracted from pacemaker devices to predict the onset or worsening of arrhythmias in the short term.
Methods: This was a multicenter prospective observational study in which data from 314 patients were analyzed. A total of 65,243 data sequences were collected, of which 55,532 (85.1%) were used to train the algorithm. This model used 31-day records to predict whether the number of arrhythmic episodes would increase, decrease, or remain the same in the following 14 days.
Results: The sensitivity and specificity of the generated predictions were calculated from 9711 prediction-observation pairs. The global sensitivity was 66.4% (95% CI 64.3%-68.3%), and specificity was 77.4% (95% CI 76.4%-78.4%). For patients with baseline arrhythmia, sensitivity was 76.8% (95% CI 74.6%-78.8%), and specificity was 39.6% (95% CI 35.8%-43.5%). The prediction for patients with no baseline arrhythmia showed a sensitivity of 39% (95% CI 35.1%-43%) and a specificity of 81% (95% CI 80.0%-81.9%). The analysis for the patient subgroup without history of atrial fibrillation (232/314, 73.9%) yielded a 69% sensitivity (95% CI 66.5%-71.5%) and an 80% specificity (95% CI 79.3%-81.3%).
Conclusions: This model was capable of predicting short-term increases or decreases in arrhythmic episodes with reasonable sensitivity and specificity using data collected through remote monitoring of implantable devices. The model's performance is expected to improve progressively as more data samples become available, including demographic data and clinical records.
背景:预测医学依靠算法来确定针对每个患者个体特征的临床治疗方案。基于人工智能的预测模型在识别房颤发作方面显示出希望;然而,它们很少关注短期动态预测。目的:本研究旨在评估使用人工智能模型和从起搏器中提取的远程监测数据来预测短期内心律失常的发生或恶化。方法:这是一项多中心前瞻性观察研究,其中分析了314例患者的数据。共收集数据序列65,243条,其中55,532条(85.1%)用于训练算法。该模型使用31天的记录来预测心律失常发作的次数在接下来的14天内是否会增加、减少或保持不变。结果:从9711对预测-观察对中计算出预测的敏感性和特异性。总体敏感性为66.4% (95% CI 64.3%-68.3%),特异性为77.4% (95% CI 76.4%-78.4%)。对于基线心律失常患者,敏感性为76.8% (95% CI 74.6%-78.8%),特异性为39.6% (95% CI 35.8%-43.5%)。对无基线心律失常患者的预测灵敏度为39% (95% CI 35.1%-43%),特异性为81% (95% CI 80.0%-81.9%)。对无房颤病史的患者亚组(232/314,73.9%)的分析得出69%的敏感性(95% CI 66.5%-71.5%)和80%的特异性(95% CI 79.3%-81.3%)。结论:该模型能够预测心律失常发作的短期增加或减少,具有合理的敏感性和特异性,使用通过植入装置远程监测收集的数据。随着可获得的数据样本越来越多,包括人口统计数据和临床记录,该模型的性能有望逐步提高。