Retrospective real-world database study to examine the prevalence and incidence of cardiovascular diseases and medication prescription in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes.
{"title":"Retrospective real-world database study to examine the prevalence and incidence of cardiovascular diseases and medication prescription in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes.","authors":"Mitsuhisa Komatsu, Hiroshi Kobayashi, Satoshi Tsuboi, Hirotaka Watada","doi":"10.1007/s13340-026-00877-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In Japan, real-world characterisation of cardiovascular disease (CVD) prevalence, incidence, and medication prescription in adults with type 2 diabetes (T2D) has been limited.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This real-world study (comprising a cross-sectional and a retrospective study) in adults aged ≥ 20 years with T2D used the Medical Data Vision database to evaluate the prevalence and incidence of three-point major adverse cardiovascular events (3P-MACE) and composite CVD and to describe medication prescription patterns.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The cross-sectional study included 292,383 patients in 2014 and 622,531 in 2021. Prevalence of 3P-MACE and composite CVD were 4.8% and 12.1%, respectively, in 2014; values in 2021 were 5.0% and 14.0%. In 2014, 2.1% of patients received glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) and 0.8% received sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT-2is); 2021 values were 9.2% and 32.3%. The retrospective study included 314,206 patients; 19.7% had a CVD history. The overall incidence rate of 3P-MACE per 1000 person-years was 12.8 (95% confidence interval [CI] 12.6-13.0); 46.6 (45.3-48.0) in those with and 8.6 (8.4-8.8) in those without CVD history. The incidence rates (95% CI) of composite CVD were 47.9 (47.4-48.3); 179.5 (177.0-182.1) in those with and 31.5 (31.1-31.9) in those without CVD history.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In Japan, the prevalence of 3P-MACE and composite CVD were almost unchanged from 2014 to 2021, whereas GLP-1RA/SGLT-2i prescriptions increased. Incidence rates of 3P-MACE and composite CVD were higher in patients with a CVD history. These data provide insights into prescription patterns in T2D in Japan and could inform future treatment practices.</p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13340-026-00877-7.</p>","PeriodicalId":11340,"journal":{"name":"Diabetology International","volume":"17 2","pages":"31"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12992755/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetology International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13340-026-00877-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/4/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: In Japan, real-world characterisation of cardiovascular disease (CVD) prevalence, incidence, and medication prescription in adults with type 2 diabetes (T2D) has been limited.
Methods: This real-world study (comprising a cross-sectional and a retrospective study) in adults aged ≥ 20 years with T2D used the Medical Data Vision database to evaluate the prevalence and incidence of three-point major adverse cardiovascular events (3P-MACE) and composite CVD and to describe medication prescription patterns.
Results: The cross-sectional study included 292,383 patients in 2014 and 622,531 in 2021. Prevalence of 3P-MACE and composite CVD were 4.8% and 12.1%, respectively, in 2014; values in 2021 were 5.0% and 14.0%. In 2014, 2.1% of patients received glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) and 0.8% received sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT-2is); 2021 values were 9.2% and 32.3%. The retrospective study included 314,206 patients; 19.7% had a CVD history. The overall incidence rate of 3P-MACE per 1000 person-years was 12.8 (95% confidence interval [CI] 12.6-13.0); 46.6 (45.3-48.0) in those with and 8.6 (8.4-8.8) in those without CVD history. The incidence rates (95% CI) of composite CVD were 47.9 (47.4-48.3); 179.5 (177.0-182.1) in those with and 31.5 (31.1-31.9) in those without CVD history.
Conclusions: In Japan, the prevalence of 3P-MACE and composite CVD were almost unchanged from 2014 to 2021, whereas GLP-1RA/SGLT-2i prescriptions increased. Incidence rates of 3P-MACE and composite CVD were higher in patients with a CVD history. These data provide insights into prescription patterns in T2D in Japan and could inform future treatment practices.
Supplementary information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13340-026-00877-7.
期刊介绍:
Diabetology International, the official journal of the Japan Diabetes Society, publishes original research articles about experimental research and clinical studies in diabetes and related areas. The journal also presents editorials, reviews, commentaries, reports of expert committees, and case reports on any aspect of diabetes. Diabetology International welcomes submissions from researchers, clinicians, and health professionals throughout the world who are interested in research, treatment, and care of patients with diabetes. All manuscripts are peer-reviewed to assure that high-quality information in the field of diabetes is made available to readers. Manuscripts are reviewed with due respect for the author''s confidentiality. At the same time, reviewers also have rights to confidentiality, which are respected by the editors. The journal follows a single-blind review procedure, where the reviewers are aware of the names and affiliations of the authors, but the reviewer reports provided to authors are anonymous. Single-blind peer review is the traditional model of peer review that many reviewers are comfortable with, and it facilitates a dispassionate critique of a manuscript.