Predictors of Infection after Cesarean Delivery.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
American journal of perinatology Pub Date : 2026-10-01 Epub Date: 2026-03-18 DOI:10.1055/a-2835-1796
Antonio F Saad, Paula L McGee, Samuel Parry, John M Thorp, Monica Longo, Alan T N Tita, Cynthia Gyamfi-Bannerman, Suneet P Chauhan, Torri D Metz, Kara Rood, Dwight J Rouse, Jennifer L Bailit, William A Grobman, Hyagriv N Simhan
{"title":"Predictors of Infection after Cesarean Delivery.","authors":"Antonio F Saad, Paula L McGee, Samuel Parry, John M Thorp, Monica Longo, Alan T N Tita, Cynthia Gyamfi-Bannerman, Suneet P Chauhan, Torri D Metz, Kara Rood, Dwight J Rouse, Jennifer L Bailit, William A Grobman, Hyagriv N Simhan","doi":"10.1055/a-2835-1796","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Postoperative infections remain a significant complication of cesarean delivery (CD), with rates ranging from 3 to 30%. These infections increase healthcare costs, prolong recovery, and negatively impact maternal outcomes. Identifying risk factors for infection might help guide preventative strategies to mitigate this burden. The primary aim of this study was to develop and validate a predictive model for infection after CD using preoperative and perioperative characteristics.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>This study was a secondary analysis of a multicenter randomized trial comparing tranexamic acid versus placebo to prevent postpartum hemorrhage in individuals undergoing either scheduled or unscheduled CD. The primary outcome of this analysis was a composite of surgical site infection, endometritis, or pelvic abscess diagnosed within 6 weeks postpartum. Univariable and multivariable bootstrapped logistic regression models with stepwise selection were used to identify predictors of infection. Model performance was evaluated using the receiver operator curve area under the curve (AUC).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 10,995 participants, 287 (2.6%) developed an infection. Significant predictors included tobacco use (OR: 1.67, 95% CI: 1.21-2.31), BMI at delivery ≥ 30 kg/m<sup>2</sup> (OR: 1.41, 95% CI: 1.04-1.91), labor before cesarean (OR: 1.71, 95% CI: 1.33-2.18), longer surgical duration (OR: 1.01 per minute, 95% CI: 1.01-1.02), uterine incision extension (OR: 1.54, 95% CI: 1.02-2.34), and the use of uterotonics other than oxytocin (OR: 1.48, 95% CI: 1.09-2.02). The predictive model demonstrated modest discrimination with an AUC of 0.64 (95% CI: 0.61-0.68).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Multiple modifiable and nonmodifiable factors influence infection after CD. This predictive model offers a framework for assessing individualized risk, though its modest performance indicates that further refinement is necessary before it can be confidently applied in clinical decision-making. Future research should aim to enhance predictive accuracy and explore whether risk stratification meaningfully informs prevention or patient counseling strategies.</p><p><strong>Key points: </strong>· This study aimed to create a model to predict postpartum infection after cesarean delivery.. · Several factors were linked to higher infection risk after cesarean delivery. These included tobacco use, obesity, labor before cesarean, longer surgery, uterine incision extension, and uterotonic use.. · The model had moderate accuracy, with an AUC of 0.6.. · Common perioperative factors may help predict infection risk after cesarean delivery..</p>","PeriodicalId":7584,"journal":{"name":"American journal of perinatology","volume":" ","pages":"1884-1891"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13439554/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of perinatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2835-1796","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Postoperative infections remain a significant complication of cesarean delivery (CD), with rates ranging from 3 to 30%. These infections increase healthcare costs, prolong recovery, and negatively impact maternal outcomes. Identifying risk factors for infection might help guide preventative strategies to mitigate this burden. The primary aim of this study was to develop and validate a predictive model for infection after CD using preoperative and perioperative characteristics.

Study design: This study was a secondary analysis of a multicenter randomized trial comparing tranexamic acid versus placebo to prevent postpartum hemorrhage in individuals undergoing either scheduled or unscheduled CD. The primary outcome of this analysis was a composite of surgical site infection, endometritis, or pelvic abscess diagnosed within 6 weeks postpartum. Univariable and multivariable bootstrapped logistic regression models with stepwise selection were used to identify predictors of infection. Model performance was evaluated using the receiver operator curve area under the curve (AUC).

Results: Of the 10,995 participants, 287 (2.6%) developed an infection. Significant predictors included tobacco use (OR: 1.67, 95% CI: 1.21-2.31), BMI at delivery ≥ 30 kg/m2 (OR: 1.41, 95% CI: 1.04-1.91), labor before cesarean (OR: 1.71, 95% CI: 1.33-2.18), longer surgical duration (OR: 1.01 per minute, 95% CI: 1.01-1.02), uterine incision extension (OR: 1.54, 95% CI: 1.02-2.34), and the use of uterotonics other than oxytocin (OR: 1.48, 95% CI: 1.09-2.02). The predictive model demonstrated modest discrimination with an AUC of 0.64 (95% CI: 0.61-0.68).

Conclusion: Multiple modifiable and nonmodifiable factors influence infection after CD. This predictive model offers a framework for assessing individualized risk, though its modest performance indicates that further refinement is necessary before it can be confidently applied in clinical decision-making. Future research should aim to enhance predictive accuracy and explore whether risk stratification meaningfully informs prevention or patient counseling strategies.

Key points: · This study aimed to create a model to predict postpartum infection after cesarean delivery.. · Several factors were linked to higher infection risk after cesarean delivery. These included tobacco use, obesity, labor before cesarean, longer surgery, uterine incision extension, and uterotonic use.. · The model had moderate accuracy, with an AUC of 0.6.. · Common perioperative factors may help predict infection risk after cesarean delivery..

剖宫产后感染的预测因素。
背景:术后感染仍然是剖宫产的一个重要并发症,发生率在3%到30%之间。这些感染增加了医疗费用,延长了康复时间,并对孕产妇结局产生了负面影响。确定感染的危险因素可能有助于指导减轻这一负担的预防战略。目的:本研究的主要目的是利用术前和围手术期特征建立和验证剖宫产术后感染的预测模型。研究设计:本研究是一项多中心随机试验的二次分析,比较氨甲环酸(TXA)与安慰剂在计划或非计划剖宫产患者中预防产后出血的效果。该分析的主要结局是产后6周内诊断的手术部位感染、子宫内膜炎或盆腔脓肿。采用逐步选择的单变量和多变量自举逻辑回归模型来识别感染的预测因子。采用接收算子曲线(ROC)曲线下面积(AUC)评估模型性能。结果:在10,995名参与者中,287名(2.6%)发生感染。重要的预测因素包括吸烟(OR: 1.67, 95% CI: 1.21-2.31)、分娩时BMI≥30 kg/m2 (OR: 1.41, 95% CI: 1.04-1.91)、剖宫产前阵痛(OR: 1.71, 95% CI: 1.33-2.18)、手术时间较长(OR: 1.01 /分钟,95% CI: 1.01-1.02)、子宫切口延伸(OR: 1.54, 95% CI: 1.02-2.34)、使用除催产素以外的子宫张力剂(OR: 1.48, 95% CI: 1.09-2.02)。预测模型显示出适度的判别,AUC为0.64 (95% CI: 0.61-0.68)。结论:多种可改变和不可改变的因素影响剖宫产术后感染。该预测模型为评估个体化风险提供了一个框架,尽管其适度的表现表明,在它可以自信地应用于临床决策之前,还需要进一步完善。未来的研究应旨在提高预测的准确性,并探讨风险分层是否有意义地为预防或患者咨询策略提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American journal of perinatology
American journal of perinatology 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
302
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Perinatology is an international, peer-reviewed, and indexed journal publishing 14 issues a year dealing with original research and topical reviews. It is the definitive forum for specialists in obstetrics, neonatology, perinatology, and maternal/fetal medicine, with emphasis on bridging the different fields. The focus is primarily on clinical and translational research, clinical and technical advances in diagnosis, monitoring, and treatment as well as evidence-based reviews. Topics of interest include epidemiology, diagnosis, prevention, and management of maternal, fetal, and neonatal diseases. Manuscripts on new technology, NICU set-ups, and nursing topics are published to provide a broad survey of important issues in this field. All articles undergo rigorous peer review, with web-based submission, expedited turn-around, and availability of electronic publication. The American Journal of Perinatology is accompanied by AJP Reports - an Open Access journal for case reports in neonatology and maternal/fetal medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书