{"title":"Educational Robotics in Health Care: A Scoping Review of Students' Attitudes, Perceptions, and Beliefs.","authors":"Jessica Habeck, Amy Knepple Carney, Erin McArthur, Seon Yoon Chung","doi":"10.1097/CIN.0000000000001509","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Advances in robotics are transforming health sciences education and helping to prepare students for future careers. Understanding students' perceptions, comfort, and attitudes towards these tools is important to help enhance learning.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using the JBI scoping review protocol and the Arksey and O'Malley framework, we conducted a comprehensive keyword search of the literature in CINAHL, ERIC, Education Source, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, and Web of Science, resulting in 576 unique records. Articles with a health care/health sciences student population, a physical robot, and an assessment of student attitudes were included.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighteen studies encompassing a diverse group of participants, including nursing students, medical students, and multidisciplinary students in various fields such as communication, computer science, nutrition, and psychology, were included in this review. Robot types studied across these studies included: telepresence robots, surgical robots, humanoid robots, nonhumanoid robots, robot animal companions, and other robot classifications (social, service, and companion). Students consistently reported positive perceptions with increased satisfaction with robots, valuing their benefits for learning, stress reduction, and career enhancement interest.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Further investigation of how students from various disciplines use educational robots and factors influencing their engagement will allow educators to tailor educational robotics and better serve our diverse student populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":520598,"journal":{"name":"Computers, informatics, nursing : CIN","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers, informatics, nursing : CIN","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CIN.0000000000001509","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Advances in robotics are transforming health sciences education and helping to prepare students for future careers. Understanding students' perceptions, comfort, and attitudes towards these tools is important to help enhance learning.
Methods: Using the JBI scoping review protocol and the Arksey and O'Malley framework, we conducted a comprehensive keyword search of the literature in CINAHL, ERIC, Education Source, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, and Web of Science, resulting in 576 unique records. Articles with a health care/health sciences student population, a physical robot, and an assessment of student attitudes were included.
Results: Eighteen studies encompassing a diverse group of participants, including nursing students, medical students, and multidisciplinary students in various fields such as communication, computer science, nutrition, and psychology, were included in this review. Robot types studied across these studies included: telepresence robots, surgical robots, humanoid robots, nonhumanoid robots, robot animal companions, and other robot classifications (social, service, and companion). Students consistently reported positive perceptions with increased satisfaction with robots, valuing their benefits for learning, stress reduction, and career enhancement interest.
Discussion: Further investigation of how students from various disciplines use educational robots and factors influencing their engagement will allow educators to tailor educational robotics and better serve our diverse student populations.
背景:机器人技术的进步正在改变健康科学教育,帮助学生为未来的职业生涯做好准备。了解学生对这些工具的看法、舒适度和态度对于帮助提高学习非常重要。方法:采用JBI定域审查方案和Arksey and O’malley框架,综合检索CINAHL、ERIC、Education Source、MEDLINE、PsycINFO、Web of Science等数据库的文献,得到576条独特记录。纳入了涉及保健/健康科学学生群体、物理机器人和学生态度评估的文章。结果:本综述纳入了18项研究,涉及不同的参与者群体,包括护理学生、医学生和不同领域的多学科学生,如通信、计算机科学、营养学和心理学。这些研究中研究的机器人类型包括:远程呈现机器人、手术机器人、人形机器人、非人形机器人、机器人动物伴侣以及其他机器人分类(社交、服务和伴侣)。学生们一致表示,他们对机器人的满意度越来越高,他们重视机器人在学习、减轻压力和提高职业兴趣方面的好处。讨论:进一步调查不同学科的学生如何使用教育机器人,以及影响他们参与的因素,将使教育工作者能够定制教育机器人,更好地服务于不同的学生群体。