Educational Robotics in Health Care: A Scoping Review of Students' Attitudes, Perceptions, and Beliefs.

IF 1.9
Jessica Habeck, Amy Knepple Carney, Erin McArthur, Seon Yoon Chung
{"title":"Educational Robotics in Health Care: A Scoping Review of Students' Attitudes, Perceptions, and Beliefs.","authors":"Jessica Habeck, Amy Knepple Carney, Erin McArthur, Seon Yoon Chung","doi":"10.1097/CIN.0000000000001509","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Advances in robotics are transforming health sciences education and helping to prepare students for future careers. Understanding students' perceptions, comfort, and attitudes towards these tools is important to help enhance learning.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using the JBI scoping review protocol and the Arksey and O'Malley framework, we conducted a comprehensive keyword search of the literature in CINAHL, ERIC, Education Source, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, and Web of Science, resulting in 576 unique records. Articles with a health care/health sciences student population, a physical robot, and an assessment of student attitudes were included.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighteen studies encompassing a diverse group of participants, including nursing students, medical students, and multidisciplinary students in various fields such as communication, computer science, nutrition, and psychology, were included in this review. Robot types studied across these studies included: telepresence robots, surgical robots, humanoid robots, nonhumanoid robots, robot animal companions, and other robot classifications (social, service, and companion). Students consistently reported positive perceptions with increased satisfaction with robots, valuing their benefits for learning, stress reduction, and career enhancement interest.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Further investigation of how students from various disciplines use educational robots and factors influencing their engagement will allow educators to tailor educational robotics and better serve our diverse student populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":520598,"journal":{"name":"Computers, informatics, nursing : CIN","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers, informatics, nursing : CIN","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CIN.0000000000001509","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Advances in robotics are transforming health sciences education and helping to prepare students for future careers. Understanding students' perceptions, comfort, and attitudes towards these tools is important to help enhance learning.

Methods: Using the JBI scoping review protocol and the Arksey and O'Malley framework, we conducted a comprehensive keyword search of the literature in CINAHL, ERIC, Education Source, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, and Web of Science, resulting in 576 unique records. Articles with a health care/health sciences student population, a physical robot, and an assessment of student attitudes were included.

Results: Eighteen studies encompassing a diverse group of participants, including nursing students, medical students, and multidisciplinary students in various fields such as communication, computer science, nutrition, and psychology, were included in this review. Robot types studied across these studies included: telepresence robots, surgical robots, humanoid robots, nonhumanoid robots, robot animal companions, and other robot classifications (social, service, and companion). Students consistently reported positive perceptions with increased satisfaction with robots, valuing their benefits for learning, stress reduction, and career enhancement interest.

Discussion: Further investigation of how students from various disciplines use educational robots and factors influencing their engagement will allow educators to tailor educational robotics and better serve our diverse student populations.

教育机器人在医疗保健:学生的态度,观念和信念的范围审查。
背景:机器人技术的进步正在改变健康科学教育,帮助学生为未来的职业生涯做好准备。了解学生对这些工具的看法、舒适度和态度对于帮助提高学习非常重要。方法:采用JBI定域审查方案和Arksey and O’malley框架,综合检索CINAHL、ERIC、Education Source、MEDLINE、PsycINFO、Web of Science等数据库的文献,得到576条独特记录。纳入了涉及保健/健康科学学生群体、物理机器人和学生态度评估的文章。结果:本综述纳入了18项研究,涉及不同的参与者群体,包括护理学生、医学生和不同领域的多学科学生,如通信、计算机科学、营养学和心理学。这些研究中研究的机器人类型包括:远程呈现机器人、手术机器人、人形机器人、非人形机器人、机器人动物伴侣以及其他机器人分类(社交、服务和伴侣)。学生们一致表示,他们对机器人的满意度越来越高,他们重视机器人在学习、减轻压力和提高职业兴趣方面的好处。讨论:进一步调查不同学科的学生如何使用教育机器人,以及影响他们参与的因素,将使教育工作者能够定制教育机器人,更好地服务于不同的学生群体。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书