Improving Patient Safety Through EMR-smart Pump Interoperability: A Mixed-methods Study in an Australian Health Service.

IF 1.9
Viviane Khalil, Madonna Dixon, Amelia Rattle, Julie Ngo
{"title":"Improving Patient Safety Through EMR-smart Pump Interoperability: A Mixed-methods Study in an Australian Health Service.","authors":"Viviane Khalil, Madonna Dixon, Amelia Rattle, Julie Ngo","doi":"10.1097/CIN.0000000000001514","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Smart infusion pumps are widely used to reduce medication errors. When integrated with electronic medical records (EMR), they support a closed-loop medication management system. This study evaluates the impact of EMR-smart pump interoperability on patient safety and user acceptability in a multicenter Australian health service. A comparative study was conducted using baseline data from a tertiary hospital without smart pump integration (December 2021 to July 2022) and post-implementation data from the newly established digital cardiac hospital (March 2023 to December 2023). Both sites utilized a coronary care-specific medication library to ensure consistency. The evaluation focused on key indicators such as medication library compliance, the frequency of pump reprogramming and high-risk medication alerts, the number of keystrokes required for programming, and the rate of alert overrides. An anonymous survey captured nursing staff perceptions related to satisfaction, workflow efficiency, and confidence in using the pump systems. Following the implementation EMR-smart pump interoperability, medication library compliance improved significantly, rising from 93% to 97%, P <.0001. Alerts related to pump reprogramming and high-risk medications also increased, suggesting enhanced safety monitoring. At the same time, programming became more efficient, with the average number of keystrokes required dropping from 13±3.4 to 3±1.2, P <.0001. However, despite these gains, survey responses revealed a decline in clinician's perceived ease of use (from 90% to 45%, P <.0001) and confidence in programming (93% to 65%, P <.0001). While the rate of cancelled infusions alerts (20% vs. 14%, P <.0001) and all other nonspecific pump alerts (23% vs. 16%, P <.0001) reduced. The integration of EMR-smart pump interoperability enhances medication safety by increasing the frequency of clinical alerts and reducing manual data entry. However, this advancement may introduce usability challenges that impact staff confidence and workflow. These findings highlight the importance of balancing technological integration with user experience to optimize patient safety outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":520598,"journal":{"name":"Computers, informatics, nursing : CIN","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers, informatics, nursing : CIN","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CIN.0000000000001514","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Smart infusion pumps are widely used to reduce medication errors. When integrated with electronic medical records (EMR), they support a closed-loop medication management system. This study evaluates the impact of EMR-smart pump interoperability on patient safety and user acceptability in a multicenter Australian health service. A comparative study was conducted using baseline data from a tertiary hospital without smart pump integration (December 2021 to July 2022) and post-implementation data from the newly established digital cardiac hospital (March 2023 to December 2023). Both sites utilized a coronary care-specific medication library to ensure consistency. The evaluation focused on key indicators such as medication library compliance, the frequency of pump reprogramming and high-risk medication alerts, the number of keystrokes required for programming, and the rate of alert overrides. An anonymous survey captured nursing staff perceptions related to satisfaction, workflow efficiency, and confidence in using the pump systems. Following the implementation EMR-smart pump interoperability, medication library compliance improved significantly, rising from 93% to 97%, P <.0001. Alerts related to pump reprogramming and high-risk medications also increased, suggesting enhanced safety monitoring. At the same time, programming became more efficient, with the average number of keystrokes required dropping from 13±3.4 to 3±1.2, P <.0001. However, despite these gains, survey responses revealed a decline in clinician's perceived ease of use (from 90% to 45%, P <.0001) and confidence in programming (93% to 65%, P <.0001). While the rate of cancelled infusions alerts (20% vs. 14%, P <.0001) and all other nonspecific pump alerts (23% vs. 16%, P <.0001) reduced. The integration of EMR-smart pump interoperability enhances medication safety by increasing the frequency of clinical alerts and reducing manual data entry. However, this advancement may introduce usability challenges that impact staff confidence and workflow. These findings highlight the importance of balancing technological integration with user experience to optimize patient safety outcomes.

通过emr智能泵互操作性提高患者安全:澳大利亚卫生服务的混合方法研究。
智能输液泵被广泛用于减少用药错误。当与电子医疗记录(EMR)集成时,它们支持闭环药物管理系统。本研究评估了emr智能泵互操作性在澳大利亚多中心医疗服务中对患者安全和用户可接受性的影响。采用未集成智能泵的三级医院的基线数据(2021年12月至2022年7月)和新成立的数字化心脏医院的实施后数据(2023年3月至2023年12月)进行对比研究。两个站点都使用了冠状动脉护理特定药物库以确保一致性。评估的重点是关键指标,如药物库依从性、泵重编程频率和高风险药物警报、编程所需的按键次数和警报覆盖率。一项匿名调查捕获了护理人员对使用泵系统的满意度、工作流程效率和信心的看法。实施emr智能泵互操作性后,药物库的合规性显著提高,从93%上升到97%
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书