A Single Menstrual Pain Question at Routine Antenatal Visits Flags Risk of Postpartum Depressive Symptoms: A Retrospective Cohort Study

IF 2.8 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING
Journal of midwifery & women's health Pub Date : 2026-06-13 Epub Date: 2026-03-18 DOI:10.1111/jmwh.70092
Takuma Yamada MD, Takeshi Murakoshi MD, PhD, Aki Nishiyama RM, Rena Suzuki RM, Hiroshi Adachi MD, PhD
{"title":"A Single Menstrual Pain Question at Routine Antenatal Visits Flags Risk of Postpartum Depressive Symptoms: A Retrospective Cohort Study","authors":"Takuma Yamada MD,&nbsp;Takeshi Murakoshi MD, PhD,&nbsp;Aki Nishiyama RM,&nbsp;Rena Suzuki RM,&nbsp;Hiroshi Adachi MD, PhD","doi":"10.1111/jmwh.70092","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Postpartum depression (PPD) is a common and serious condition, and early identification of patients who are at risk during pregnancy is a clinical priority. Premenstrual mood disorders and dysmenorrhea have been associated with PPD, but routine diagnostic ascertainment is not always feasible. We evaluated whether a single yes/no question about menstrual pain can flag women at higher risk of PPD.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This single-center, retrospective cohort study was performed at a tertiary perinatal unit. Menstrual pain was routinely documented during antenatal care and operationalized as a binary exposure (yes/no). The primary outcome was an Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale score greater than or equal to 9 at one month postpartum. We estimated adjusted odds ratios (aORs) using multivariable logistic regression, adjusting for maternal age, body mass index, infertility treatment, parity, number of fetuses, current smoking during pregnancy, and a history of mental illness. Adjusted risks were obtained by marginal standardization. The primary analysis used complete cases, with multiple imputation using 50 imputations as a sensitivity analysis.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Among 5096 women, the crude risk of PPD was 5.3% in women without menstrual pain and 7.4% in those with menstrual pain. Menstrual pain was associated with PPD (aOR, 1.39; 95% CI, 1.09-1.77), and the results were similar with multiple imputation. The adjusted risk was 5.5% without menstrual pain and 7.2% with menstrual pain (absolute risk difference of 1.7 percentage points and a risk ratio of 1.3).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Discussion</h3>\n \n <p>A single yes/no question about menstrual pain identified women who were pregnant and at elevated risk of PPD. Given its minimal burden and high feasibility in midwifery workflows, this screen may support early psychosocial follow-up.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":16468,"journal":{"name":"Journal of midwifery & women's health","volume":"71 3","pages":"439-444"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of midwifery & women's health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jmwh.70092","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Postpartum depression (PPD) is a common and serious condition, and early identification of patients who are at risk during pregnancy is a clinical priority. Premenstrual mood disorders and dysmenorrhea have been associated with PPD, but routine diagnostic ascertainment is not always feasible. We evaluated whether a single yes/no question about menstrual pain can flag women at higher risk of PPD.

Methods

This single-center, retrospective cohort study was performed at a tertiary perinatal unit. Menstrual pain was routinely documented during antenatal care and operationalized as a binary exposure (yes/no). The primary outcome was an Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale score greater than or equal to 9 at one month postpartum. We estimated adjusted odds ratios (aORs) using multivariable logistic regression, adjusting for maternal age, body mass index, infertility treatment, parity, number of fetuses, current smoking during pregnancy, and a history of mental illness. Adjusted risks were obtained by marginal standardization. The primary analysis used complete cases, with multiple imputation using 50 imputations as a sensitivity analysis.

Results

Among 5096 women, the crude risk of PPD was 5.3% in women without menstrual pain and 7.4% in those with menstrual pain. Menstrual pain was associated with PPD (aOR, 1.39; 95% CI, 1.09-1.77), and the results were similar with multiple imputation. The adjusted risk was 5.5% without menstrual pain and 7.2% with menstrual pain (absolute risk difference of 1.7 percentage points and a risk ratio of 1.3).

Discussion

A single yes/no question about menstrual pain identified women who were pregnant and at elevated risk of PPD. Given its minimal burden and high feasibility in midwifery workflows, this screen may support early psychosocial follow-up.

一个单一的月经疼痛问题在常规产前检查标志产后抑郁症状的风险:一项回顾性队列研究。
产后抑郁症(PPD)是一种常见且严重的疾病,早期识别孕期高危患者是临床的重点。经前情绪障碍和痛经与PPD有关,但常规诊断并不总是可行的。我们评估了一个关于月经疼痛的是或否的问题是否可以标志女性患产后抑郁症的风险更高。方法:这项单中心、回顾性队列研究在一家三级围产单位进行。在产前护理期间,月经疼痛被常规记录下来,并作为二元暴露(是/否)进行操作。主要结局是产后一个月爱丁堡产后抑郁量表得分大于或等于9分。我们使用多变量logistic回归估计校正优势比(aORs),校正了产妇年龄、体重指数、不孕症治疗、胎次、胎儿数量、孕期吸烟史和精神病史。通过边际标准化得到调整后的风险。初步分析使用完整的病例,并使用50个imputation作为敏感性分析。结果:在5096名女性中,无痛经的女性发生PPD的粗风险为5.3%,有痛经的女性为7.4%。月经疼痛与PPD相关(aOR, 1.39; 95% CI, 1.09-1.77),多重代入结果相似。调整后的无痛经风险为5.5%,有痛经风险为7.2%(绝对风险差异为1.7个百分点,风险比为1.3)。讨论:一个关于经期疼痛的是或否的问题确定了怀孕妇女和PPD的高风险。鉴于其负担最小且在助产工作流程中可行性高,该筛查可支持早期社会心理随访。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
7.40%
发文量
103
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Midwifery & Women''s Health (JMWH) is a bimonthly, peer-reviewed journal dedicated to the publication of original research and review articles that focus on midwifery and women''s health. JMWH provides a forum for interdisciplinary exchange across a broad range of women''s health issues. Manuscripts that address midwifery, women''s health, education, evidence-based practice, public health, policy, and research are welcomed
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书