[Finger joint arthrodesis with the cup and cone technique : A simple and safe procedure].

Unfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany) Pub Date : 2026-06-01 Epub Date: 2026-03-17 DOI:10.1007/s00113-026-01698-8
Adrian Sebald, Andreas Arkudas, Raymund E Horch
{"title":"[Finger joint arthrodesis with the cup and cone technique : A simple and safe procedure].","authors":"Adrian Sebald, Andreas Arkudas, Raymund E Horch","doi":"10.1007/s00113-026-01698-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Finger joint arthrosis frequently results from trauma, degenerative or inflammatory causes. When conservative treatment and joint-preserving procedures fail, arthrodesis remains a reliable surgical option to relieve pain and restore hand function. Among the various techniques, the cup and cone method has proven particularly effective due to its large cartilage-free surface area and ease of intraoperative axis correction. The aim of this study is to evaluate this based on the patient cohort of a supramaximum care provider.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis of 201 finger joint arthrodeses in 168 patients was conducted between 2015 and 2025. Data collected included demographics, joint location, surgical indications and postoperative complications. A subgroup analysis of arthrodesis performed for degenerative osteoarthritis included comparison of preoperative and postoperative axis deviation and flexion angles per joint type.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients had a mean age of 60 years and 71% were male. The right hand was affected in 54% of cases. Most arthrodeses involved proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joints (104), followed by distal interphalangeal (DIP, 65) and thumb IP joints (16). The leading indication was posttraumatic arthritis (48%), followed by degeneration (20%). Complication rates were low, with infection being the most common. In degenerative osteoarthritis cases, significant postoperative reductions in axis deviation were observed (up to 25°).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Arthrodesis of the finger joints is an effective measure for improving function and relieving symptoms in treatment-refractory cases. The cup and cone technique has proven to be a procedure with a high success rate and a low complication rate. Individual planning of joint positioning and careful selection of the surgical technique are crucial for the functional outcome. Future prospective studies should further investigate long-term effects and patient satisfaction.</p>","PeriodicalId":75280,"journal":{"name":"Unfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany)","volume":" ","pages":"394-401"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13216149/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Unfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00113-026-01698-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Finger joint arthrosis frequently results from trauma, degenerative or inflammatory causes. When conservative treatment and joint-preserving procedures fail, arthrodesis remains a reliable surgical option to relieve pain and restore hand function. Among the various techniques, the cup and cone method has proven particularly effective due to its large cartilage-free surface area and ease of intraoperative axis correction. The aim of this study is to evaluate this based on the patient cohort of a supramaximum care provider.

Material and methods: A retrospective analysis of 201 finger joint arthrodeses in 168 patients was conducted between 2015 and 2025. Data collected included demographics, joint location, surgical indications and postoperative complications. A subgroup analysis of arthrodesis performed for degenerative osteoarthritis included comparison of preoperative and postoperative axis deviation and flexion angles per joint type.

Results: Patients had a mean age of 60 years and 71% were male. The right hand was affected in 54% of cases. Most arthrodeses involved proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joints (104), followed by distal interphalangeal (DIP, 65) and thumb IP joints (16). The leading indication was posttraumatic arthritis (48%), followed by degeneration (20%). Complication rates were low, with infection being the most common. In degenerative osteoarthritis cases, significant postoperative reductions in axis deviation were observed (up to 25°).

Conclusion: Arthrodesis of the finger joints is an effective measure for improving function and relieving symptoms in treatment-refractory cases. The cup and cone technique has proven to be a procedure with a high success rate and a low complication rate. Individual planning of joint positioning and careful selection of the surgical technique are crucial for the functional outcome. Future prospective studies should further investigate long-term effects and patient satisfaction.

手指关节杯锥融合术:一种简单安全的方法。
背景:手指关节病通常由外伤、退行性或炎症引起。当保守治疗和保关节手术失败时,关节融合术仍然是减轻疼痛和恢复手功能的可靠手术选择。在各种技术中,杯锥法已被证明特别有效,因为其无软骨表面积大,术中轴线校正容易。本研究的目的是基于最高护理提供者的患者队列来评估这一点。材料与方法:回顾性分析2015 - 2025年间168例201例手指关节病变患者的临床资料。收集的数据包括人口统计学、关节位置、手术指征和术后并发症。对退行性骨关节炎进行关节融合术的亚组分析包括比较术前和术后各关节类型的轴偏差和屈曲角度。结果:患者平均年龄60岁,男性占71%。54%的病例会影响到右手。大多数关节病涉及近端指间关节(PIP)(104),其次是远端指间关节(DIP, 65)和拇指指间关节(16)。最主要的适应症是创伤后关节炎(48%),其次是变性(20%)。并发症发生率低,感染最为常见。在退行性骨关节炎病例中,观察到明显的术后轴偏差减少(高达25°)。结论:手指关节融合术是治疗难治性病例改善功能、缓解症状的有效措施。杯锥技术是一种成功率高、并发症少的手术方法。关节定位的个人规划和手术技术的仔细选择对功能结果至关重要。未来的前瞻性研究应进一步调查长期效果和患者满意度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书