{"title":"[Finger joint arthrodesis with the cup and cone technique : A simple and safe procedure].","authors":"Adrian Sebald, Andreas Arkudas, Raymund E Horch","doi":"10.1007/s00113-026-01698-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Finger joint arthrosis frequently results from trauma, degenerative or inflammatory causes. When conservative treatment and joint-preserving procedures fail, arthrodesis remains a reliable surgical option to relieve pain and restore hand function. Among the various techniques, the cup and cone method has proven particularly effective due to its large cartilage-free surface area and ease of intraoperative axis correction. The aim of this study is to evaluate this based on the patient cohort of a supramaximum care provider.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis of 201 finger joint arthrodeses in 168 patients was conducted between 2015 and 2025. Data collected included demographics, joint location, surgical indications and postoperative complications. A subgroup analysis of arthrodesis performed for degenerative osteoarthritis included comparison of preoperative and postoperative axis deviation and flexion angles per joint type.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients had a mean age of 60 years and 71% were male. The right hand was affected in 54% of cases. Most arthrodeses involved proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joints (104), followed by distal interphalangeal (DIP, 65) and thumb IP joints (16). The leading indication was posttraumatic arthritis (48%), followed by degeneration (20%). Complication rates were low, with infection being the most common. In degenerative osteoarthritis cases, significant postoperative reductions in axis deviation were observed (up to 25°).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Arthrodesis of the finger joints is an effective measure for improving function and relieving symptoms in treatment-refractory cases. The cup and cone technique has proven to be a procedure with a high success rate and a low complication rate. Individual planning of joint positioning and careful selection of the surgical technique are crucial for the functional outcome. Future prospective studies should further investigate long-term effects and patient satisfaction.</p>","PeriodicalId":75280,"journal":{"name":"Unfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany)","volume":" ","pages":"394-401"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13216149/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Unfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00113-026-01698-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Finger joint arthrosis frequently results from trauma, degenerative or inflammatory causes. When conservative treatment and joint-preserving procedures fail, arthrodesis remains a reliable surgical option to relieve pain and restore hand function. Among the various techniques, the cup and cone method has proven particularly effective due to its large cartilage-free surface area and ease of intraoperative axis correction. The aim of this study is to evaluate this based on the patient cohort of a supramaximum care provider.
Material and methods: A retrospective analysis of 201 finger joint arthrodeses in 168 patients was conducted between 2015 and 2025. Data collected included demographics, joint location, surgical indications and postoperative complications. A subgroup analysis of arthrodesis performed for degenerative osteoarthritis included comparison of preoperative and postoperative axis deviation and flexion angles per joint type.
Results: Patients had a mean age of 60 years and 71% were male. The right hand was affected in 54% of cases. Most arthrodeses involved proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joints (104), followed by distal interphalangeal (DIP, 65) and thumb IP joints (16). The leading indication was posttraumatic arthritis (48%), followed by degeneration (20%). Complication rates were low, with infection being the most common. In degenerative osteoarthritis cases, significant postoperative reductions in axis deviation were observed (up to 25°).
Conclusion: Arthrodesis of the finger joints is an effective measure for improving function and relieving symptoms in treatment-refractory cases. The cup and cone technique has proven to be a procedure with a high success rate and a low complication rate. Individual planning of joint positioning and careful selection of the surgical technique are crucial for the functional outcome. Future prospective studies should further investigate long-term effects and patient satisfaction.