{"title":"Comparison of Emergency Medicine Resident and Attending Physician Approval Rates in Online Medical Control: A 10-year Retrospective Analysis.","authors":"Russell A Baker, Alexander Toppo","doi":"10.1016/j.acepjo.2026.100356","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We assessed whether emergency medicine residents, after completing a structured 4-hour training program and supervised proctoring, demonstrate decision making in online medical control comparable with that of board-certified attending physicians.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective cross-sectional study of online medical direction calls to the University Medical Centre of El Paso, the emergency medical services (EMS) base station for the El Paso Fire Department. First-year residents completed a 4-hour curriculum covering EMS systems, protocols, ethics, communication, and simulation, followed by 5 supervised calls. We analyzed all online medical control encounters between August 2016 and August 2025. Calls lacking a binary approval outcome were excluded. Approval/disapproval rates were compared between residents and attendings using Fisher's exact test for small samples, chi-square tests for overall comparisons, and 2-proportion z-tests for large categories. Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% CIs were calculated. Equivalence testing applied a prespecified margin of ± 3%.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 10,492 calls, 8405 were eligible. Residents (n = 6589) approved 93.4% of requests versus 93.1% for attendings (n = 1816) (χ<sup>2</sup> = 0.11, <i>P</i> = .74; OR, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.84-1.29). Category-level comparisons revealed no statistically significant differences, with Fisher's exact <i>P</i> > 0.05 for all subgroups. Patient refusals (99.5% vs 100%) and termination of resuscitation (98.0% vs 99.4%) were uniformly high across both groups. The 2 one-sided test procedure confirmed equivalence, with a 90% CI for the difference (-0.85% to 1.35%) falling entirely within the ±3% margin.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Emergency medicine residents trained with a focused 4-hour curriculum and limited supervised experience performed online medical control duties at a level statistically and clinically equivalent to attending physicians across a decade of real-world EMS consultations. This model provided a practical and efficient way to include residents in EMS medical direction roles, supporting both system capacity and residency education.</p>","PeriodicalId":73967,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open","volume":"7 3","pages":"100356"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12990345/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acepjo.2026.100356","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: We assessed whether emergency medicine residents, after completing a structured 4-hour training program and supervised proctoring, demonstrate decision making in online medical control comparable with that of board-certified attending physicians.
Methods: This was a retrospective cross-sectional study of online medical direction calls to the University Medical Centre of El Paso, the emergency medical services (EMS) base station for the El Paso Fire Department. First-year residents completed a 4-hour curriculum covering EMS systems, protocols, ethics, communication, and simulation, followed by 5 supervised calls. We analyzed all online medical control encounters between August 2016 and August 2025. Calls lacking a binary approval outcome were excluded. Approval/disapproval rates were compared between residents and attendings using Fisher's exact test for small samples, chi-square tests for overall comparisons, and 2-proportion z-tests for large categories. Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% CIs were calculated. Equivalence testing applied a prespecified margin of ± 3%.
Results: Of 10,492 calls, 8405 were eligible. Residents (n = 6589) approved 93.4% of requests versus 93.1% for attendings (n = 1816) (χ2 = 0.11, P = .74; OR, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.84-1.29). Category-level comparisons revealed no statistically significant differences, with Fisher's exact P > 0.05 for all subgroups. Patient refusals (99.5% vs 100%) and termination of resuscitation (98.0% vs 99.4%) were uniformly high across both groups. The 2 one-sided test procedure confirmed equivalence, with a 90% CI for the difference (-0.85% to 1.35%) falling entirely within the ±3% margin.
Conclusion: Emergency medicine residents trained with a focused 4-hour curriculum and limited supervised experience performed online medical control duties at a level statistically and clinically equivalent to attending physicians across a decade of real-world EMS consultations. This model provided a practical and efficient way to include residents in EMS medical direction roles, supporting both system capacity and residency education.