Comparison of Emergency Medicine Resident and Attending Physician Approval Rates in Online Medical Control: A 10-year Retrospective Analysis.

IF 1.8 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Russell A Baker, Alexander Toppo
{"title":"Comparison of Emergency Medicine Resident and Attending Physician Approval Rates in Online Medical Control: A 10-year Retrospective Analysis.","authors":"Russell A Baker, Alexander Toppo","doi":"10.1016/j.acepjo.2026.100356","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We assessed whether emergency medicine residents, after completing a structured 4-hour training program and supervised proctoring, demonstrate decision making in online medical control comparable with that of board-certified attending physicians.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective cross-sectional study of online medical direction calls to the University Medical Centre of El Paso, the emergency medical services (EMS) base station for the El Paso Fire Department. First-year residents completed a 4-hour curriculum covering EMS systems, protocols, ethics, communication, and simulation, followed by 5 supervised calls. We analyzed all online medical control encounters between August 2016 and August 2025. Calls lacking a binary approval outcome were excluded. Approval/disapproval rates were compared between residents and attendings using Fisher's exact test for small samples, chi-square tests for overall comparisons, and 2-proportion z-tests for large categories. Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% CIs were calculated. Equivalence testing applied a prespecified margin of ± 3%.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 10,492 calls, 8405 were eligible. Residents (n = 6589) approved 93.4% of requests versus 93.1% for attendings (n = 1816) (χ<sup>2</sup> = 0.11, <i>P</i> = .74; OR, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.84-1.29). Category-level comparisons revealed no statistically significant differences, with Fisher's exact <i>P</i> > 0.05 for all subgroups. Patient refusals (99.5% vs 100%) and termination of resuscitation (98.0% vs 99.4%) were uniformly high across both groups. The 2 one-sided test procedure confirmed equivalence, with a 90% CI for the difference (-0.85% to 1.35%) falling entirely within the ±3% margin.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Emergency medicine residents trained with a focused 4-hour curriculum and limited supervised experience performed online medical control duties at a level statistically and clinically equivalent to attending physicians across a decade of real-world EMS consultations. This model provided a practical and efficient way to include residents in EMS medical direction roles, supporting both system capacity and residency education.</p>","PeriodicalId":73967,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open","volume":"7 3","pages":"100356"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12990345/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acepjo.2026.100356","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: We assessed whether emergency medicine residents, after completing a structured 4-hour training program and supervised proctoring, demonstrate decision making in online medical control comparable with that of board-certified attending physicians.

Methods: This was a retrospective cross-sectional study of online medical direction calls to the University Medical Centre of El Paso, the emergency medical services (EMS) base station for the El Paso Fire Department. First-year residents completed a 4-hour curriculum covering EMS systems, protocols, ethics, communication, and simulation, followed by 5 supervised calls. We analyzed all online medical control encounters between August 2016 and August 2025. Calls lacking a binary approval outcome were excluded. Approval/disapproval rates were compared between residents and attendings using Fisher's exact test for small samples, chi-square tests for overall comparisons, and 2-proportion z-tests for large categories. Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% CIs were calculated. Equivalence testing applied a prespecified margin of ± 3%.

Results: Of 10,492 calls, 8405 were eligible. Residents (n = 6589) approved 93.4% of requests versus 93.1% for attendings (n = 1816) (χ2 = 0.11, P = .74; OR, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.84-1.29). Category-level comparisons revealed no statistically significant differences, with Fisher's exact P > 0.05 for all subgroups. Patient refusals (99.5% vs 100%) and termination of resuscitation (98.0% vs 99.4%) were uniformly high across both groups. The 2 one-sided test procedure confirmed equivalence, with a 90% CI for the difference (-0.85% to 1.35%) falling entirely within the ±3% margin.

Conclusion: Emergency medicine residents trained with a focused 4-hour curriculum and limited supervised experience performed online medical control duties at a level statistically and clinically equivalent to attending physicians across a decade of real-world EMS consultations. This model provided a practical and efficient way to include residents in EMS medical direction roles, supporting both system capacity and residency education.

急诊内科住院医师与主治医师在线医疗控制认可率的比较:10年回顾性分析。
目的:我们评估急诊住院医师在完成4小时的结构化培训计划和监督监督后,是否表现出与委员会认证的主治医生相当的在线医疗控制决策能力。方法:这是一项对埃尔帕索大学医学中心(埃尔帕索消防局的紧急医疗服务(EMS)基站)的在线医疗指示呼叫进行的回顾性横断面研究。第一年住院医师完成了4小时的课程,包括EMS系统、协议、道德、通信和模拟,随后是5次监督呼叫。我们分析了2016年8月至2025年8月之间的所有在线医疗控制事件。缺少二进制批准结果的调用被排除在外。对住院医师和主治医师之间的赞成/不赞成率进行比较,对小样本使用Fisher精确检验,对总体比较使用卡方检验,对大类别使用2-比例z检验。计算95% ci的优势比(ORs)。等效性检验采用预先规定的±3%的裕度。结果:10492个呼叫中,8405个符合要求。住院医生(n = 6589)批准了93.4%的请求,而主治医生(n = 1816)批准了93.1% (χ2 = 0.11, P = 0.74; OR, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.84-1.29)。类别水平比较显示没有统计学上的显著差异,所有亚组的Fisher精确P < 0.05。两组患者的拒绝率(99.5% vs 100%)和复苏终止率(98.0% vs 99.4%)均较高。2个单侧试验程序证实了等效性,差异的90% CI(-0.85%至1.35%)完全落在±3%的范围内。结论:接受过4小时重点课程和有限监督经验培训的急诊医学住院医师在统计和临床水平上履行在线医疗控制职责,相当于十年现实世界EMS会诊的主治医生。该模型提供了一种实用而有效的方法,将住院医师纳入EMS医疗指导角色,支持系统能力和住院医师教育。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
5 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书