The effectiveness of telepractice for speech-language pathology intervention with children younger than 12 years: A meta-analysis.

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare Pub Date : 2026-10-01 Epub Date: 2026-03-18 DOI:10.1177/1357633X261426068
Jolijn Vanderauwera, Femke Vanden Bempt, Wendy D'haenens, Heleen Leysen, Anne-Lise Leclercq, Sabine Van Eerdenbrugh
{"title":"The effectiveness of telepractice for speech-language pathology intervention with children younger than 12 years: A meta-analysis.","authors":"Jolijn Vanderauwera, Femke Vanden Bempt, Wendy D'haenens, Heleen Leysen, Anne-Lise Leclercq, Sabine Van Eerdenbrugh","doi":"10.1177/1357633X261426068","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundSince Coronavirus disease 2019, telepractice delivery has become increasingly integrated in the standard practice of speech-language pathologists and audiologists. It is therefore important to synthesize existing knowledge on this intervention modality. However, limited evidence exists regarding its use in children. This meta-analysis evaluated evidence on the effectiveness of telepractice compared to in-person intervention for children aged ≤ 12 years.MethodA systematic search was conducted for systematic reviews, meta-analyses and randomized controlled trials comparing telepractice and in-person intervention for children ≤12 years. Eight databases were searched: PsychINFO, Linguistics and Language Behaviour Abstracts, Education Resources Information Centre, Web of Sciences, PubMed, Embase, the Joanna Briggs Institute database, and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature.ResultsSeven studies on speech-language pathology intervention met the inclusion criteria; no audiology studies could be included. Effect sizes were calculated for 31 outcomes reported across both conditions (telepractice and in-person intervention). Eight effect sizes were inverted, allowing all positive values to indicate favourable intervention outcomes. Overall, interventions resulted in moderate to high effects, with telepractice intervention resulting in equal or larger effect sizes compared to in-person intervention.ConclusionTelepractice intervention demonstrated outcomes comparable or better than in-person intervention across speech-language pathology subdomains. This applies to both child-related and caregiver-related outcomes, as well as for child-directed (typically for children ≥ 4 years) and caregiver-mediated approaches, where caregivers are trained to implement the strategies at home with their child. These findings suggest that telepractice intervention is an effective alternative to in-person intervention.</p>","PeriodicalId":50024,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare","volume":" ","pages":"743-756"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1357633X261426068","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BackgroundSince Coronavirus disease 2019, telepractice delivery has become increasingly integrated in the standard practice of speech-language pathologists and audiologists. It is therefore important to synthesize existing knowledge on this intervention modality. However, limited evidence exists regarding its use in children. This meta-analysis evaluated evidence on the effectiveness of telepractice compared to in-person intervention for children aged ≤ 12 years.MethodA systematic search was conducted for systematic reviews, meta-analyses and randomized controlled trials comparing telepractice and in-person intervention for children ≤12 years. Eight databases were searched: PsychINFO, Linguistics and Language Behaviour Abstracts, Education Resources Information Centre, Web of Sciences, PubMed, Embase, the Joanna Briggs Institute database, and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature.ResultsSeven studies on speech-language pathology intervention met the inclusion criteria; no audiology studies could be included. Effect sizes were calculated for 31 outcomes reported across both conditions (telepractice and in-person intervention). Eight effect sizes were inverted, allowing all positive values to indicate favourable intervention outcomes. Overall, interventions resulted in moderate to high effects, with telepractice intervention resulting in equal or larger effect sizes compared to in-person intervention.ConclusionTelepractice intervention demonstrated outcomes comparable or better than in-person intervention across speech-language pathology subdomains. This applies to both child-related and caregiver-related outcomes, as well as for child-directed (typically for children ≥ 4 years) and caregiver-mediated approaches, where caregivers are trained to implement the strategies at home with their child. These findings suggest that telepractice intervention is an effective alternative to in-person intervention.

远程实践对12岁以下儿童言语病理干预的有效性:一项荟萃分析。
自2019年冠状病毒病以来,远程医疗已经越来越多地融入语言病理学家和听力学家的标准实践中。因此,综合有关这种干预方式的现有知识是很重要的。然而,关于其在儿童中的使用证据有限。本荟萃分析评估了对≤12岁儿童进行远程实践与面对面干预的有效性证据。方法采用系统综述、荟萃分析和随机对照试验对≤12岁儿童进行远程诊疗和现场干预的比较。检索了8个数据库:PsychINFO、语言学和语言行为摘要、教育资源信息中心、Web of Sciences、PubMed、Embase、Joanna Briggs研究所数据库和护理及相关健康文献累积索引。结果7项言语语言病理干预研究符合纳入标准;不包括听力学研究。计算了在两种情况下(远程实践和现场干预)报告的31个结果的效应量。8个效应量被反转,所有正值都表明有利的干预结果。总体而言,干预产生了中等到高的效果,与现场干预相比,远程实践干预产生了相同或更大的效果。结论远程实践干预在言语病理子领域的效果与现场干预相当或更好。这既适用于与儿童相关的结果,也适用于以儿童为导向的方法(通常针对4岁以上儿童)和照顾者介导的方法,在这些方法中,照顾者接受培训,在家中与孩子一起实施这些策略。这些发现表明远程实践干预是面对面干预的有效替代。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
14.10
自引率
10.60%
发文量
174
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare provides excellent peer reviewed coverage of developments in telemedicine and e-health and is now widely recognised as the leading journal in its field. Contributions from around the world provide a unique perspective on how different countries and health systems are using new technology in health care. Sections within the journal include technology updates, editorials, original articles, research tutorials, educational material, review articles and reports from various telemedicine organisations. A subscription to this journal will help you to stay up-to-date in this fast moving and growing area of medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书