Leveraging artificial intelligence to accelerate competency development in diagnostic reasoning of medical students.

IF 4 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Medical Teacher Pub Date : 2026-10-01 Epub Date: 2026-03-17 DOI:10.1080/0142159X.2026.2641769
Moushumi Sur, Supaporn Dissaneevate, Araya Yuenyongviwat, Kanokpan Ruangnapa, Winston Liaw, Peter Boedeker, Shelley Kumar, Brian Rissmiller, Satid Thammasitboon
{"title":"Leveraging artificial intelligence to accelerate competency development in diagnostic reasoning of medical students.","authors":"Moushumi Sur, Supaporn Dissaneevate, Araya Yuenyongviwat, Kanokpan Ruangnapa, Winston Liaw, Peter Boedeker, Shelley Kumar, Brian Rissmiller, Satid Thammasitboon","doi":"10.1080/0142159X.2026.2641769","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Diagnostic errors remain a critical patient safety concern, yet teaching diagnostic reasoning is challenging due to its complex, context-specific nature. Traditional teaching methods emphasize analytical reasoning but often neglect non-analytical, pattern recognition processes that are grounded in script theory. Script theory highlights illness scripts-structured mental representations of diseases-as foundational to diagnostic expertise. Advances in artificial intelligence (AI) offer opportunities to support illness script formulation through personalized, scalable feedback. This study evaluated whether chatbot-enabled instruction and feedback improve medical students' illness script quality compared with conventional instruction techniques.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a parallel-group randomized controlled trial with 83 medical students at Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai, Thailand. Participants were randomized to conventional instruction or chatbot-enabled instruction using Microsoft Copilot. Both groups received didactic instruction, followed by illness script formulation tasks at three timepoints: pre-test (T1), immediate post-test (T2), and post-intervention with new cases (T3). Illness scripts were assessed using the validated Illness Script Assessment Tool (ISAT), which evaluates structure, content, richness, and maturity. Data was analyzed using cumulative link mixed-effects models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Baseline illness script quality was comparable between groups. Chatbot-enabled instruction produced significantly greater improvements in script structure (OR 3.7), content (OR 3.3), and maturity (OR 2.9) at immediate post, with gains sustained at transfer testing for structure. Richness scores showed delayed improvement (OR 2.9). Composite ISAT scores confirmed durable improvements (OR 3.2 at T2; OR 2.7 at T3).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Chatbot-enabled instruction accelerated and enhanced illness script development compared with conventional methods, operationalizing deliberate practice principles and making non-analytical reasoning teachable. By integrating structured pedagogy with scalable AI feedback, this approach reduces educator burden while fostering diagnostic expertise. Future multi-site studies should examine long-term retention, clinical transfer, and AI feedback fidelity to ensure reliability and equity.</p>","PeriodicalId":18643,"journal":{"name":"Medical Teacher","volume":" ","pages":"1699-1707"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Teacher","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2026.2641769","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Diagnostic errors remain a critical patient safety concern, yet teaching diagnostic reasoning is challenging due to its complex, context-specific nature. Traditional teaching methods emphasize analytical reasoning but often neglect non-analytical, pattern recognition processes that are grounded in script theory. Script theory highlights illness scripts-structured mental representations of diseases-as foundational to diagnostic expertise. Advances in artificial intelligence (AI) offer opportunities to support illness script formulation through personalized, scalable feedback. This study evaluated whether chatbot-enabled instruction and feedback improve medical students' illness script quality compared with conventional instruction techniques.

Methods: We conducted a parallel-group randomized controlled trial with 83 medical students at Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai, Thailand. Participants were randomized to conventional instruction or chatbot-enabled instruction using Microsoft Copilot. Both groups received didactic instruction, followed by illness script formulation tasks at three timepoints: pre-test (T1), immediate post-test (T2), and post-intervention with new cases (T3). Illness scripts were assessed using the validated Illness Script Assessment Tool (ISAT), which evaluates structure, content, richness, and maturity. Data was analyzed using cumulative link mixed-effects models.

Results: Baseline illness script quality was comparable between groups. Chatbot-enabled instruction produced significantly greater improvements in script structure (OR 3.7), content (OR 3.3), and maturity (OR 2.9) at immediate post, with gains sustained at transfer testing for structure. Richness scores showed delayed improvement (OR 2.9). Composite ISAT scores confirmed durable improvements (OR 3.2 at T2; OR 2.7 at T3).

Discussion: Chatbot-enabled instruction accelerated and enhanced illness script development compared with conventional methods, operationalizing deliberate practice principles and making non-analytical reasoning teachable. By integrating structured pedagogy with scalable AI feedback, this approach reduces educator burden while fostering diagnostic expertise. Future multi-site studies should examine long-term retention, clinical transfer, and AI feedback fidelity to ensure reliability and equity.

利用人工智能加速医学生诊断推理能力的发展。
诊断错误仍然是一个重要的患者安全问题,但教学诊断推理是具有挑战性的,因为它的复杂性,具体情况的性质。传统的教学方法强调分析推理,但往往忽视基于脚本理论的非分析性模式识别过程。剧本理论强调疾病剧本——结构化的疾病心理表征——是诊断专业知识的基础。人工智能(AI)的进步提供了通过个性化、可扩展的反馈来支持疾病脚本制定的机会。本研究评估了与传统教学技术相比,聊天机器人的教学和反馈是否能提高医学生的病情记录质量。方法:我们对泰国合艾宋卡王子大学的83名医科学生进行了平行组随机对照试验。参与者被随机分配到传统教学或使用微软Copilot的聊天机器人教学。两组均接受说教性指导,然后在三个时间点进行疾病脚本编写任务:测试前(T1)、测试后(T2)和干预后出现新病例(T3)。使用经过验证的疾病脚本评估工具(ISAT)评估疾病脚本,该工具评估结构、内容、丰富性和成熟度。使用累积链接混合效应模型分析数据。结果:两组间基线疾病记录质量具有可比性。启用聊天机器人的指令在脚本结构(OR 3.7)、内容(OR 3.3)和成熟度(OR 2.9)方面产生了显著的更大改进,并且在结构的转移测试中获得了持续的收益。丰富度评分显示延迟改善(OR 2.9)。综合ISAT评分证实了持久的改善(T2时OR 3.2; T3时OR 2.7)。讨论:与传统方法相比,聊天机器人支持的教学加速并增强了疾病脚本的开发,使刻意练习原则可操作,并使非分析性推理可教。通过将结构化教学法与可扩展的人工智能反馈相结合,这种方法在培养诊断专业知识的同时减轻了教育工作者的负担。未来的多地点研究应检查长期保留、临床转移和人工智能反馈的保真度,以确保可靠性和公平性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Medical Teacher
Medical Teacher 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
8.50%
发文量
396
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Medical Teacher provides accounts of new teaching methods, guidance on structuring courses and assessing achievement, and serves as a forum for communication between medical teachers and those involved in general education. In particular, the journal recognizes the problems teachers have in keeping up-to-date with the developments in educational methods that lead to more effective teaching and learning at a time when the content of the curriculum—from medical procedures to policy changes in health care provision—is also changing. The journal features reports of innovation and research in medical education, case studies, survey articles, practical guidelines, reviews of current literature and book reviews. All articles are peer reviewed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书