Pinch Force Endurance and Usability Considerations for Pre-filled Syringe Designs Used by Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Patients.

Q3 Medicine
Xueke Wang, Jaclyn Baron, Joanna So, Laura Morton, James Hoare, Julian Dixon, Sherri Biondi
{"title":"Pinch Force Endurance and Usability Considerations for Pre-filled Syringe Designs Used by Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Patients.","authors":"Xueke Wang, Jaclyn Baron, Joanna So, Laura Morton, James Hoare, Julian Dixon, Sherri Biondi","doi":"10.5731/pdajpst.2025-000049.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background</b> Prefilled syringes (PFS) are commonly used for self-administered injectable drugs, particularly for chronic conditions. A critical design factor is the injection force needed to depress the plunger, which varies by drug viscosity and syringe mechanics. This is especially important for patients with potential strength limitations. Human factors studies help evaluate these physical demands to ensure PFS can be used safely and effectively across diverse users. Assessing both maximum force capabilities and endurance provides key insights for optimizing syringe design and minimizing patient discomfort.<b>Objectives</b> This study evaluated Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) patients' experience with PFS samples of varying injectability (injection force and duration) and measured pinch force endurance-an indicator for PFS physical demand. Those insights aimed to guide PFS design for users with strength limitations.<b>Methods</b> 42 COPD patients performed simulated injections using three PFS samples (28N, 38N, 47N force) and rated perceived demand. They also gripped a surrogate PFS device at 28N and maximum force to measure endurance. Data predicted the 5th percentile pinch force endurance for COPD patients.<b>Results</b> The estimated COPD patients' 5th percentile pinch force endurance at 28N was 16 seconds, while their maximum pinch force endurance was around 4.4 seconds. Males pinched and held 28N longer than females, but no gender difference was observed at the maximum force. Endurance decreased as required force approached maximum capacity (consistent with Rohmert's Curve).<b>Conclusions</b> PFS usage can be challenging for users with strength limitations. A 28N force was sustainable for 16 seconds for 95% of COPD patients. Developers should minimize injection force where possible and accommodate varied injection styles-lower forces improve endurance, aiding users with reduced strength. These findings support designing accessible PFS for diverse populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":19986,"journal":{"name":"PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5731/pdajpst.2025-000049.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background Prefilled syringes (PFS) are commonly used for self-administered injectable drugs, particularly for chronic conditions. A critical design factor is the injection force needed to depress the plunger, which varies by drug viscosity and syringe mechanics. This is especially important for patients with potential strength limitations. Human factors studies help evaluate these physical demands to ensure PFS can be used safely and effectively across diverse users. Assessing both maximum force capabilities and endurance provides key insights for optimizing syringe design and minimizing patient discomfort.Objectives This study evaluated Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) patients' experience with PFS samples of varying injectability (injection force and duration) and measured pinch force endurance-an indicator for PFS physical demand. Those insights aimed to guide PFS design for users with strength limitations.Methods 42 COPD patients performed simulated injections using three PFS samples (28N, 38N, 47N force) and rated perceived demand. They also gripped a surrogate PFS device at 28N and maximum force to measure endurance. Data predicted the 5th percentile pinch force endurance for COPD patients.Results The estimated COPD patients' 5th percentile pinch force endurance at 28N was 16 seconds, while their maximum pinch force endurance was around 4.4 seconds. Males pinched and held 28N longer than females, but no gender difference was observed at the maximum force. Endurance decreased as required force approached maximum capacity (consistent with Rohmert's Curve).Conclusions PFS usage can be challenging for users with strength limitations. A 28N force was sustainable for 16 seconds for 95% of COPD patients. Developers should minimize injection force where possible and accommodate varied injection styles-lower forces improve endurance, aiding users with reduced strength. These findings support designing accessible PFS for diverse populations.

慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者使用的预填充注射器设计的捏力耐力和可用性考虑。
预充式注射器(PFS)通常用于自我给药的注射药物,特别是慢性疾病。一个关键的设计因素是压下柱塞所需的注射力,该注射力随药物粘度和注射器力学而变化。这对于有潜在力量限制的患者尤其重要。人为因素研究有助于评估这些物理需求,以确保PFS可以安全有效地用于不同的用户。评估最大力量能力和耐力为优化注射器设计和最大限度地减少患者不适提供了关键见解。目的:本研究评估慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者使用不同注射性(注射力和持续时间)的PFS样品的体验,并测量捏力耐力- PFS身体需求的指标。这些见解旨在为有力量限制的用户指导PFS设计。方法42例COPD患者分别使用3种PFS样品(28N、38N、47N力)进行模拟注射,并评定感知需求。他们还在28N和最大力的情况下抓住一个替代PFS装置来测量耐力。数据预测了COPD患者的第5百分位捏力耐力。结果慢性阻塞性肺病患者在28N时的第5百分位捏力耐力为16秒,最大捏力耐力约为4.4秒。雄性比雌性长捏28N,但在最大力度上没有观察到性别差异。耐力随着所需的力接近最大容量而下降(与Rohmert曲线一致)。结论:对于力量受限的患者,PFS的使用具有挑战性。对于95%的COPD患者,28N的力可以持续16秒。开发人员应该尽可能减少注射力,并适应不同的注射方式——较低的注射力可以提高耐力,帮助用户减少注射力。这些发现支持为不同人群设计可访问的PFS。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书