Sex Differences in the Treatment Effect of Targeted Heart Rate Aerobic Exercise in Adolescents with Acute Sport-Related Concussion.

IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Journal of neurotrauma Pub Date : 2026-11-01 Epub Date: 2026-03-18 DOI:10.1177/08977151261433831
Elizabeth V Castro, Haley M Chizuk, John J Leddy, Nell Aronoff, Eve M Valera, Mohammad N Haider
{"title":"Sex Differences in the Treatment Effect of Targeted Heart Rate Aerobic Exercise in Adolescents with Acute Sport-Related Concussion.","authors":"Elizabeth V Castro, Haley M Chizuk, John J Leddy, Nell Aronoff, Eve M Valera, Mohammad N Haider","doi":"10.1177/08977151261433831","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Prescribed aerobic exercise is the recommended treatment for athletes with sport-related concussion (SRC) who present with exercise intolerance. A recent randomized controlled trial (RCT) found that higher volumes of aerobic exercise, compared with lower volumes, may not be as efficacious in adolescent females with SRC compared with adolescent males. We reanalyzed data from our previously published randomized controlled trials (RCT) and hypothesized that prescribed aerobic exercise, and not stretching, within 10 days of injury would result in faster recovery after SRC in males compared with females. The first RCT (<i>n</i> = 103) recruited from 2015 to 2018 and the second RCT (<i>n</i> = 115) recruited from 2018 to 2020. Sexes were compared in each RCT, then samples were stratified by sex, and intervention groups were compared using a Log-rank test. There were no significant differences in recovery times between males and females in either RCT, regardless of intervention. When stratified by sex and comparing intervention groups, males in RCT1 who were prescribed aerobic exercise (<i>n</i> = 28) recovered 6 days faster than males prescribed stretching (<i>n</i> = 27, <i>p</i> = 0.004) but there was no significant difference for females (aerobic exercise [<i>n</i> = 24] vs. stretching [<i>n</i> = 24, 3-day difference, <i>p</i> = 0.564]). In RCT2, males prescribed aerobic exercise (<i>n</i> = 39) recovered 8 days faster than the stretching group (<i>n</i> = 34, <i>p</i> = 0.020), whereas there was no significant difference for females (aerobic exercise [<i>n</i> = 22] vs. stretching [<i>n</i> = 20, 3-day difference, <i>p</i> = 0.587]). This reanalysis of prior RCT data revealed that male adolescents after SRC recovered significantly faster by 7-8 days when prescribed aerobic exercise within 10 days of injury, whereas female adolescents had a nonsignificant improvement of 3 days. Future adequately powered studies should account for variability between sexes.</p>","PeriodicalId":16512,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurotrauma","volume":" ","pages":"1806-1813"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neurotrauma","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08977151261433831","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Prescribed aerobic exercise is the recommended treatment for athletes with sport-related concussion (SRC) who present with exercise intolerance. A recent randomized controlled trial (RCT) found that higher volumes of aerobic exercise, compared with lower volumes, may not be as efficacious in adolescent females with SRC compared with adolescent males. We reanalyzed data from our previously published randomized controlled trials (RCT) and hypothesized that prescribed aerobic exercise, and not stretching, within 10 days of injury would result in faster recovery after SRC in males compared with females. The first RCT (n = 103) recruited from 2015 to 2018 and the second RCT (n = 115) recruited from 2018 to 2020. Sexes were compared in each RCT, then samples were stratified by sex, and intervention groups were compared using a Log-rank test. There were no significant differences in recovery times between males and females in either RCT, regardless of intervention. When stratified by sex and comparing intervention groups, males in RCT1 who were prescribed aerobic exercise (n = 28) recovered 6 days faster than males prescribed stretching (n = 27, p = 0.004) but there was no significant difference for females (aerobic exercise [n = 24] vs. stretching [n = 24, 3-day difference, p = 0.564]). In RCT2, males prescribed aerobic exercise (n = 39) recovered 8 days faster than the stretching group (n = 34, p = 0.020), whereas there was no significant difference for females (aerobic exercise [n = 22] vs. stretching [n = 20, 3-day difference, p = 0.587]). This reanalysis of prior RCT data revealed that male adolescents after SRC recovered significantly faster by 7-8 days when prescribed aerobic exercise within 10 days of injury, whereas female adolescents had a nonsignificant improvement of 3 days. Future adequately powered studies should account for variability between sexes.

针对性心率有氧运动对青少年急性运动相关脑震荡治疗效果的性别差异
处方有氧运动是运动相关性脑震荡(SRC)运动员的推荐治疗方法。最近的一项随机对照试验(RCT)发现,与较少的有氧运动相比,较多的有氧运动对患有SRC的青春期女性的效果可能不如青春期男性。我们重新分析了之前发表的随机对照试验(RCT)的数据,并假设在受伤后10天内进行规定的有氧运动,而不是拉伸,会使男性SRC后的恢复速度比女性更快。第一组RCT (n = 103)于2015 - 2018年招募,第二组RCT (n = 115)于2018 - 2020年招募。在每个RCT中比较性别,然后按性别对样本进行分层,使用Log-rank检验对干预组进行比较。在任何一项随机对照试验中,无论干预与否,男性和女性在恢复时间上都没有显著差异。当按性别分层并比较干预组时,RCT1中规定有氧运动的男性(n = 28)比规定拉伸运动的男性恢复快6天(n = 27, p = 0.004),但女性没有显著差异(有氧运动[n = 24]与拉伸运动[n = 24, 3天差异,p = 0.564])。在RCT2中,男性规定有氧运动(n = 39)比拉伸组恢复快8天(n = 34, p = 0.020),而女性没有显著差异(有氧运动[n = 22]与拉伸组[n = 20, 3天差异,p = 0.587])。这项对先前RCT数据的重新分析显示,在受伤后10天内进行规定的有氧运动,男性青少年在SRC后的7-8天内恢复明显更快,而女性青少年在3天内没有显著改善。未来充分有力的研究应该考虑到性别之间的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of neurotrauma
Journal of neurotrauma 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
7.10%
发文量
233
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Neurotrauma is the flagship, peer-reviewed publication for reporting on the latest advances in both the clinical and laboratory investigation of traumatic brain and spinal cord injury. The Journal focuses on the basic pathobiology of injury to the central nervous system, while considering preclinical and clinical trials targeted at improving both the early management and long-term care and recovery of traumatically injured patients. This is the essential journal publishing cutting-edge basic and translational research in traumatically injured human and animal studies, with emphasis on neurodegenerative disease research linked to CNS trauma.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书