"No judgment, no preaching": approaches to harm reduction service provision for people who use drugs in North Carolina.

IF 4.2 2区 社会学 Q1 SUBSTANCE ABUSE
David C Colston, Adams L Sibley, Elizabeth Joniak-Grant, Hillary L Mortensen, Monica E Swilley-Martinez, Brian W Pence, Vivian F Go, Shabbar I Ranapurwala
{"title":"\"No judgment, no preaching\": approaches to harm reduction service provision for people who use drugs in North Carolina.","authors":"David C Colston, Adams L Sibley, Elizabeth Joniak-Grant, Hillary L Mortensen, Monica E Swilley-Martinez, Brian W Pence, Vivian F Go, Shabbar I Ranapurwala","doi":"10.1186/s12954-026-01440-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Our study examines how harm reduction service providers (providers) throughout North Carolina (NC) provide services to people who use opioids (PWUO), how these service provision strategies align with PWUO preferences, and implications for care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted semi-structured in-depth interviews and used a thematic analytic strategy to identify common approaches to service delivery among providers (n = 10), rationales for taking these approaches, and how approaches were received by PWUO (n = 30). To be included in the study, service providers had to provide direct care to PWUO, while PWUO had to be 18 + and be in active opioid use (not as prescribed by a doctor); providers and PWUO had to live in NC.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Providers often allowed PWUO to take the lead in service delivery interactions, asked limited questions about what/how participants use drugs, and rarely offered unsolicited information. Providers believed questioning could feel invasive or stigmatizing to PWUO. They also thought questions were unnecessary, assuming PWUO understood the risks that come with drug use. Providers reported that they would take the lead in interactions to correct PWUO's misconceptions that could make their use more dangerous, and would, occasionally, offer unsolicited information related to upcoming events or new services, or if PWUO appeared open to receiving more information. PWUO varied in desired approach by providers, based on the established rapport between providers and PWUO, and whether PWUO were in withdrawal during the interaction. Still, PWUO generally felt syringe service programs were a safe space, and many wanted to be asked more about their use so providers could provide tailored information about risks, trends, and safe use.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Providers offer valuable services and safe spaces for PWUO in NC, but should ask program participants' preferences regarding interaction style to ensure the services provided are aligned with the desires of PWUO to have the maximum possible impact.</p>","PeriodicalId":12922,"journal":{"name":"Harm Reduction Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13107735/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Harm Reduction Journal","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12954-026-01440-y","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Our study examines how harm reduction service providers (providers) throughout North Carolina (NC) provide services to people who use opioids (PWUO), how these service provision strategies align with PWUO preferences, and implications for care.

Methods: We conducted semi-structured in-depth interviews and used a thematic analytic strategy to identify common approaches to service delivery among providers (n = 10), rationales for taking these approaches, and how approaches were received by PWUO (n = 30). To be included in the study, service providers had to provide direct care to PWUO, while PWUO had to be 18 + and be in active opioid use (not as prescribed by a doctor); providers and PWUO had to live in NC.

Results: Providers often allowed PWUO to take the lead in service delivery interactions, asked limited questions about what/how participants use drugs, and rarely offered unsolicited information. Providers believed questioning could feel invasive or stigmatizing to PWUO. They also thought questions were unnecessary, assuming PWUO understood the risks that come with drug use. Providers reported that they would take the lead in interactions to correct PWUO's misconceptions that could make their use more dangerous, and would, occasionally, offer unsolicited information related to upcoming events or new services, or if PWUO appeared open to receiving more information. PWUO varied in desired approach by providers, based on the established rapport between providers and PWUO, and whether PWUO were in withdrawal during the interaction. Still, PWUO generally felt syringe service programs were a safe space, and many wanted to be asked more about their use so providers could provide tailored information about risks, trends, and safe use.

Conclusion: Providers offer valuable services and safe spaces for PWUO in NC, but should ask program participants' preferences regarding interaction style to ensure the services provided are aligned with the desires of PWUO to have the maximum possible impact.

“不判断,不说教”:北卡罗来纳州为吸毒者提供减少伤害服务的方法。
背景:我们的研究考察了整个北卡罗来纳州(NC)的减少危害服务提供者(提供者)如何为使用阿片类药物(PWUO)的人提供服务,这些服务提供策略如何与PWUO偏好保持一致,以及对护理的影响。方法:我们进行了半结构化的深度访谈,并使用主题分析策略来确定供应商之间提供服务的常见方法(n = 10),采取这些方法的理由,以及PWUO如何接受这些方法(n = 30)。要纳入研究,服务提供者必须为PWUO提供直接护理,而PWUO必须年满18岁,并且正在积极使用阿片类药物(不是按照医生的处方);供应商和PWUO必须住在NC。结果:提供者通常允许PWUO在服务提供互动中发挥主导作用,询问有关参与者使用药物的内容/方式的有限问题,并且很少提供未经请求的信息。提供者认为询问可能会给PWUO带来侵犯性或污名化。他们还认为,假设PWUO了解药物使用带来的风险,这些问题是不必要的。供应商报告说,他们将带头纠正PWUO的误解,这些误解可能使他们的使用更加危险,并且偶尔会提供与即将发生的事件或新服务有关的未经请求的信息,或者如果PWUO愿意接受更多信息。基于供应商与PWUO之间建立的融洽关系,以及PWUO在互动过程中是否处于退出状态,供应商期望的PWUO方法各不相同。尽管如此,PWUO普遍认为注射器服务项目是一个安全的空间,许多人希望更多地了解其使用情况,以便提供者可以提供有关风险、趋势和安全使用的量身定制信息。结论:提供者为北卡罗来纳的PWUO提供有价值的服务和安全的空间,但应询问项目参与者对交互风格的偏好,以确保所提供的服务与PWUO的愿望保持一致,以产生最大可能的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Harm Reduction Journal
Harm Reduction Journal Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
9.10%
发文量
126
审稿时长
26 weeks
期刊介绍: Harm Reduction Journal is an Open Access, peer-reviewed, online journal whose focus is on the prevalent patterns of psychoactive drug use, the public policies meant to control them, and the search for effective methods of reducing the adverse medical, public health, and social consequences associated with both drugs and drug policies. We define "harm reduction" as "policies and programs which aim to reduce the health, social, and economic costs of legal and illegal psychoactive drug use without necessarily reducing drug consumption". We are especially interested in studies of the evolving patterns of drug use around the world, their implications for the spread of HIV/AIDS and other blood-borne pathogens.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书