Unpacking willpower in unassisted smoking cessation: a qualitative analysis reveals a systematic profile of situational and cognitive strategies.

IF 2.7 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Health Psychology and Behavioral Medicine Pub Date : 2026-03-14 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.1080/21642850.2026.2644658
Effie Marathia, Sheila Duffy, Abigail Stephen, Kimberly R More, Blair Saunders
{"title":"Unpacking willpower in unassisted smoking cessation: a qualitative analysis reveals a systematic profile of situational and cognitive strategies.","authors":"Effie Marathia, Sheila Duffy, Abigail Stephen, Kimberly R More, Blair Saunders","doi":"10.1080/21642850.2026.2644658","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Over half of those who quit smoking do so without formal assistance, yet the psychological processes supporting unassisted cessation remain little understood. Success is often attributed to willpower, an umbrella term that lacks explanatory precision and obscures the underlying tractable processes. Drawing on the Process Model of Self-Regulation and the Behavior Change Technique (BCT) Taxonomy, this study aimed to identify the concrete strategies that enable individuals to quit smoking unassisted, thereby clarifying what willpower might look like in practice.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Thirty-two participants who had successfully quit smoking without formal support participated in semi-structured interviews. Inductive content analysis identified key challenges, while deductive coding mapped strategies addressing these challenges to the Process Model of Self-Regulation and the BCT Taxonomy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants' accounts reflected a diverse range of strategies, averaging seven distinct BCTs, spanning the Situation Selection and Modification, Attention Redeployment, and Cognitive Change stages from the Process Model. Common BCTs included avoiding environmental triggers, substituting smoking with alternative behaviors, and seeking social support. In contrast, Response Modulation (e.g. 'just say no') accounted for only 1% of the data.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Unassisted quitters drew from a sophisticated repertoire of strategies that are actionable, teachable, and embedded within the individual's physical and social environment. The qualitative methodology used in this study offers an understanding of the lived experiences of self-quitters, potentially informing public health interventions that integrate individual and system-level approaches to behavior change that extend beyond brute-force willpower.</p>","PeriodicalId":12891,"journal":{"name":"Health Psychology and Behavioral Medicine","volume":"14 1","pages":"2644658"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12990265/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Psychology and Behavioral Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21642850.2026.2644658","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Over half of those who quit smoking do so without formal assistance, yet the psychological processes supporting unassisted cessation remain little understood. Success is often attributed to willpower, an umbrella term that lacks explanatory precision and obscures the underlying tractable processes. Drawing on the Process Model of Self-Regulation and the Behavior Change Technique (BCT) Taxonomy, this study aimed to identify the concrete strategies that enable individuals to quit smoking unassisted, thereby clarifying what willpower might look like in practice.

Materials and methods: Thirty-two participants who had successfully quit smoking without formal support participated in semi-structured interviews. Inductive content analysis identified key challenges, while deductive coding mapped strategies addressing these challenges to the Process Model of Self-Regulation and the BCT Taxonomy.

Results: Participants' accounts reflected a diverse range of strategies, averaging seven distinct BCTs, spanning the Situation Selection and Modification, Attention Redeployment, and Cognitive Change stages from the Process Model. Common BCTs included avoiding environmental triggers, substituting smoking with alternative behaviors, and seeking social support. In contrast, Response Modulation (e.g. 'just say no') accounted for only 1% of the data.

Conclusion: Unassisted quitters drew from a sophisticated repertoire of strategies that are actionable, teachable, and embedded within the individual's physical and social environment. The qualitative methodology used in this study offers an understanding of the lived experiences of self-quitters, potentially informing public health interventions that integrate individual and system-level approaches to behavior change that extend beyond brute-force willpower.

在无辅助戒烟中解压意志力:一项定性分析揭示了情境和认知策略的系统概况。
背景:超过一半的戒烟者是在没有正式帮助的情况下戒烟的,然而支持无辅助戒烟的心理过程仍然知之甚少。成功通常被归因于意志力,这是一个笼统的术语,缺乏解释的准确性,并且模糊了潜在的可处理过程。利用自我调节过程模型和行为改变技术(BCT)分类法,本研究旨在确定具体的策略,使个人能够在没有帮助的情况下戒烟,从而阐明意志力在实践中可能是什么样子。材料与方法:采用半结构化访谈法,对32名没有正式支持的成功戒烟者进行访谈。归纳内容分析确定了关键挑战,而演绎编码将解决这些挑战的策略映射到自我调节过程模型和BCT分类法中。结果:参与者的描述反映了不同的策略范围,平均七个不同的btc,跨越了过程模型的情境选择和修改、注意力重新部署和认知变化阶段。常见的btc包括避免环境诱因,用其他行为代替吸烟,以及寻求社会支持。相反,响应调制(例如:“说不”)只占数据的1%。结论:无辅助戒烟者从一套复杂的、可操作的、可教的、嵌入个人身体和社会环境的策略中得出结论。本研究中使用的定性方法提供了对自我戒烟者生活经历的理解,有可能为公共卫生干预提供信息,这些干预将个人和系统层面的方法结合起来,以实现超越暴力意志力的行为改变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
3.70%
发文量
57
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊介绍: Health Psychology and Behavioral Medicine: an Open Access Journal (HPBM) publishes theoretical and empirical contributions on all aspects of research and practice into psychosocial, behavioral and biomedical aspects of health. HPBM publishes international, interdisciplinary research with diverse methodological approaches on: Assessment and diagnosis Narratives, experiences and discourses of health and illness Treatment processes and recovery Health cognitions and behaviors at population and individual levels Psychosocial an behavioral prevention interventions Psychosocial determinants and consequences of behavior Social and cultural contexts of health and illness, health disparities Health, illness and medicine Application of advanced information and communication technology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书