Development and validation of a predictive model for pleural effusion control following talc pleurodesis in malignant pleural effusion.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Shunya Hanawa, Masaru Ejima, Mari Sugawara, Natsushi Kubota, Rina Kato, Kotaro Hanawa, Seishi Higashi, Satoko Hanada, Reiko Taki
{"title":"Development and validation of a predictive model for pleural effusion control following talc pleurodesis in malignant pleural effusion.","authors":"Shunya Hanawa, Masaru Ejima, Mari Sugawara, Natsushi Kubota, Rina Kato, Kotaro Hanawa, Seishi Higashi, Satoko Hanada, Reiko Taki","doi":"10.1007/s10147-026-03007-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Talc slurry pleurodesis is widely used for malignant pleural effusion (MPE); however, its success rate ranges from 50 to 75%, and reliable predictors are lacking. This study aimed to identify predictors of pleural effusion control failure following pleurodesis and develop a short-term predictive scoring system.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed 170 patients with MPE who underwent talc pleurodesis at a single center between 2014 and 2024. The cohort was divided into training (n = 136) and validation (n = 34) cohorts. Logistic regression was used to identify independent predictors of pleural effusion control failure within 30-90 days.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The most common primary tumors were lung, breast, and ovarian cancers. Pleural effusion was controlled in 70.6% of cases. Univariate analysis identified low body mass index, supportive care alone, Grade 2 collapse of the lower lung field post-drainage, extensive pulmonary consolidation, large tumor (≥ 7 cm), hypoalbuminemia, and positive pleural fluid cytology (Class III or higher) to be associated with pleural effusion control failure. Multivariate analysis revealed that massive pleural effusion (P = 0.048), supportive care alone (P < 0.001), and Grade 2 lung collapse (P = 0.003) were independent predictors of pleural effusion control failure. A scoring system incorporating these factors was validated in a validation cohort, demonstrating a control rate of approximately 90%, 60% and 30% in patients scoring ≤ 1, 2 and ≥ 3 points, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The scoring system may support early decision-making regarding talc pleurodesis and palliative strategies, potentially improving quality of life in patients with MPE.</p>","PeriodicalId":13869,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Clinical Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"890-898"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Clinical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-026-03007-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Talc slurry pleurodesis is widely used for malignant pleural effusion (MPE); however, its success rate ranges from 50 to 75%, and reliable predictors are lacking. This study aimed to identify predictors of pleural effusion control failure following pleurodesis and develop a short-term predictive scoring system.

Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 170 patients with MPE who underwent talc pleurodesis at a single center between 2014 and 2024. The cohort was divided into training (n = 136) and validation (n = 34) cohorts. Logistic regression was used to identify independent predictors of pleural effusion control failure within 30-90 days.

Results: The most common primary tumors were lung, breast, and ovarian cancers. Pleural effusion was controlled in 70.6% of cases. Univariate analysis identified low body mass index, supportive care alone, Grade 2 collapse of the lower lung field post-drainage, extensive pulmonary consolidation, large tumor (≥ 7 cm), hypoalbuminemia, and positive pleural fluid cytology (Class III or higher) to be associated with pleural effusion control failure. Multivariate analysis revealed that massive pleural effusion (P = 0.048), supportive care alone (P < 0.001), and Grade 2 lung collapse (P = 0.003) were independent predictors of pleural effusion control failure. A scoring system incorporating these factors was validated in a validation cohort, demonstrating a control rate of approximately 90%, 60% and 30% in patients scoring ≤ 1, 2 and ≥ 3 points, respectively.

Conclusions: The scoring system may support early decision-making regarding talc pleurodesis and palliative strategies, potentially improving quality of life in patients with MPE.

恶性胸腔积液滑石胸膜切除术后胸腔积液控制预测模型的建立与验证。
背景:滑石粉浆液胸膜切除术广泛用于恶性胸腔积液(MPE);然而,它的成功率在50%到75%之间,并且缺乏可靠的预测。本研究旨在确定胸膜切除术后胸腔积液控制失败的预测因素,并建立一个短期预测评分系统。方法:我们回顾性分析了2014年至2024年间在单一中心接受滑石粉胸膜固定术的170例MPE患者。该队列分为训练队列(n = 136)和验证队列(n = 34)。采用Logistic回归确定30-90天内胸腔积液控制失败的独立预测因素。结果:最常见的原发肿瘤是肺癌、乳腺癌和卵巢癌。70.6%的病例胸腔积液得到控制。单因素分析发现,低体重指数、单独支持治疗、引流后肺下野2级塌陷、广泛肺实变、大肿瘤(≥7cm)、低白蛋白血症和胸水细胞学阳性(III级或更高)与胸腔积液控制失败相关。多因素分析显示大量胸腔积液(P = 0.048),单独支持治疗(P)。结论:评分系统可以支持滑石粉胸膜截留和姑息策略的早期决策,可能改善MPE患者的生活质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
3.00%
发文量
175
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Clinical Oncology (IJCO) welcomes original research papers on all aspects of clinical oncology that report the results of novel and timely investigations. Reports on clinical trials are encouraged. Experimental studies will also be accepted if they have obvious relevance to clinical oncology. Membership in the Japan Society of Clinical Oncology is not a prerequisite for submission to the journal. Papers are received on the understanding that: their contents have not been published in whole or in part elsewhere; that they are subject to peer review by at least two referees and the Editors, and to editorial revision of the language and contents; and that the Editors are responsible for their acceptance, rejection, and order of publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书