Pressure gradient vs. flow relationships in patients with symptomatic valvular aortic stenosis - PREFLOW.

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Henrik Vase, Ashkan Eftekhari, Steen H Poulsen, Christian J Terkelsen, Evald H Christiansen, Nils P Johnson, Mads J Andersen
{"title":"Pressure gradient vs. flow relationships in patients with symptomatic valvular aortic stenosis - PREFLOW.","authors":"Henrik Vase, Ashkan Eftekhari, Steen H Poulsen, Christian J Terkelsen, Evald H Christiansen, Nils P Johnson, Mads J Andersen","doi":"10.1007/s00392-026-02890-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Management of aortic stenosis, particularly with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and discordant or borderline echocardiographic findings, remains challenging, both in assessing the true severity of stenosis and in isolating the valvular contribution to symptoms amidst comorbid conditions. This study evaluates the feasibility and physiological insight obtained from invasive pressure measurements across the aortic valve at rest and during exercise in symptomatic patients with aortic stenosis (AS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective cross-sectional study included patients with symptomatic high-gradient severe, low-gradient severe, and moderate aortic stenosis. They underwent invasive pressure gradient measurements across the aortic valve (pressure catheters in the left ventricle and ascending aorta) with concurrent right heart catheterization at rest and during peak supine bicycle exercise.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 28 patients included, invasive measurements during exercise were feasible in 25 patients. Overall, exercise induced increases in aortic valve gradient, flow, and opening area, but there was considerable heterogeneity in individual hemodynamic responses. Notably, of the 14 patients in the low-gradient severe group based on echocardiography, nine demonstrated divergent physiological responses consistent with either moderate or high-gradient severe during exercise. All patients - irrespective of stenosis severity - had differential causes of symptoms during exercise with at least one of the following: chronotropic incompetence, abnormal increase in pulmonary artery or left ventricular end-diastolic pressures, or peripheral impairment of oxygen extraction or utilization.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings demonstrate the safety and feasibility of invasive hemodynamic exercise testing in patients with aortic stenosis and highlight heterogeneity in pressure-flow responses during exercise. Invasive hemodynamic assessment during exercise may help elucidate alternative contributing mechanisms to exertional dyspnea, particularly in patients with aortic stenosis and discordant symptoms and findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":10474,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Research in Cardiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Research in Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-026-02890-x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Management of aortic stenosis, particularly with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and discordant or borderline echocardiographic findings, remains challenging, both in assessing the true severity of stenosis and in isolating the valvular contribution to symptoms amidst comorbid conditions. This study evaluates the feasibility and physiological insight obtained from invasive pressure measurements across the aortic valve at rest and during exercise in symptomatic patients with aortic stenosis (AS).

Methods: This prospective cross-sectional study included patients with symptomatic high-gradient severe, low-gradient severe, and moderate aortic stenosis. They underwent invasive pressure gradient measurements across the aortic valve (pressure catheters in the left ventricle and ascending aorta) with concurrent right heart catheterization at rest and during peak supine bicycle exercise.

Results: Of 28 patients included, invasive measurements during exercise were feasible in 25 patients. Overall, exercise induced increases in aortic valve gradient, flow, and opening area, but there was considerable heterogeneity in individual hemodynamic responses. Notably, of the 14 patients in the low-gradient severe group based on echocardiography, nine demonstrated divergent physiological responses consistent with either moderate or high-gradient severe during exercise. All patients - irrespective of stenosis severity - had differential causes of symptoms during exercise with at least one of the following: chronotropic incompetence, abnormal increase in pulmonary artery or left ventricular end-diastolic pressures, or peripheral impairment of oxygen extraction or utilization.

Conclusion: These findings demonstrate the safety and feasibility of invasive hemodynamic exercise testing in patients with aortic stenosis and highlight heterogeneity in pressure-flow responses during exercise. Invasive hemodynamic assessment during exercise may help elucidate alternative contributing mechanisms to exertional dyspnea, particularly in patients with aortic stenosis and discordant symptoms and findings.

有症状的瓣膜性主动脉瓣狭窄患者的压力梯度与血流关系- PREFLOW。
导论:主动脉瓣狭窄的治疗,特别是左室射血分数(LVEF)保留和超声心动图结果不一致或有边界的情况,无论是评估狭窄的真实严重程度,还是在合并症中分离瓣膜对症状的影响,都是具有挑战性的。本研究评估了在有症状的主动脉瓣狭窄(AS)患者休息和运动时通过主动脉瓣进行有创压力测量的可行性和生理学见解。方法:这项前瞻性横断面研究包括有症状的高梯度重度、低梯度重度和中度主动脉瓣狭窄的患者。他们在休息和仰卧自行车运动高峰时接受了通过主动脉瓣(左心室和升主动脉的压力导管)的有创压力梯度测量,同时进行了右心导管置入。结果:在纳入的28例患者中,25例患者在运动时进行有创测量是可行的。总体而言,运动诱导主动脉瓣梯度、流量和开放面积增加,但个体血流动力学反应存在相当大的异质性。值得注意的是,在基于超声心动图的低梯度重度组的14例患者中,有9例在运动期间表现出与中度或高梯度重度一致的不同生理反应。所有患者,无论狭窄程度如何,在运动过程中均有不同的症状,至少有以下一项:变时功能不全,肺动脉或左心室舒张末压异常升高,或外周氧气提取或利用障碍。结论:这些研究结果证明了有创血流动力学运动测试在主动脉瓣狭窄患者中的安全性和可行性,并突出了运动过程中压力-血流反应的异质性。运动期间有创性血流动力学评估可能有助于阐明运动性呼吸困难的其他机制,特别是在主动脉瓣狭窄且症状和表现不一致的患者中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Research in Cardiology
Clinical Research in Cardiology 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
11.40
自引率
4.00%
发文量
140
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Research in Cardiology is an international journal for clinical cardiovascular research. It provides a forum for original and review articles as well as critical perspective articles. Articles are only accepted if they meet stringent scientific standards and have undergone peer review. The journal regularly receives articles from the field of clinical cardiology, angiology, as well as heart and vascular surgery. As the official journal of the German Cardiac Society, it gives a current and competent survey on the diagnosis and therapy of heart and vascular diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书