Clinical outcomes of revision arthroplasty with a modular taper fluted titanium stem for the treatment of Vancouver B2 and B3 periprosthetic femur fractures.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Canadian Journal of Surgery Pub Date : 2026-03-17 Print Date: 2026-03-01 DOI:10.1503/cjs.011125
Jeremy Kubik, Margaret S Juryn, Sahil Kooner, Oleg Safir, Allan Gross, Paul Kuzyk
{"title":"Clinical outcomes of revision arthroplasty with a modular taper fluted titanium stem for the treatment of Vancouver B2 and B3 periprosthetic femur fractures.","authors":"Jeremy Kubik, Margaret S Juryn, Sahil Kooner, Oleg Safir, Allan Gross, Paul Kuzyk","doi":"10.1503/cjs.011125","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Existing literature on Vancouver B2 and B3 periprosthetic fracture management with modular tapered fluted stems (MTFS) is limited by lack of patient-reported outcomes, small samples, and unseparated inclusion of multiple implant models. This study examines the outcomes of Vancouver B2 and B3 fractures treated with a single MTFS hip system, the Zimmer Modular Revision (ZMR), with a minimum 1-year follow-up.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective review of all patients who received a femoral revision with a ZMR taper stem to treat a Vancouver B2 or B3 fracture at our centre between 2006 and 2020. The primary outcome was all-cause reoperation, with secondary outcomes including the Harris Hip Score (HHS), the Oxford Hip Score (OHS), stem subsidence, and mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 44 patients (mean age 71.6 yr) in the final analysis, with a mean follow-up of 50.2 months. The all-cause reoperation rate was 11.9% (<i>n</i> = 5). Although there were 3 cases (7.1%) of stem subsidence, there were no cases in which stem revision was required. The mean HHS was 77.2 (standard deviation [SD] 10.6, range 47 to 91) and the mean OHS was 42.5 (SD 5.2, range 33 to 48).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Management of Vancouver B2 and B3 periprosthetic femur fractures with the ZMR MFTS option resulted in an acceptable complication profile and good functional outcome with a minimum 1-year follow-up.</p>","PeriodicalId":9573,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Surgery","volume":"69 2","pages":"E122-E129"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12999225/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1503/cjs.011125","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Existing literature on Vancouver B2 and B3 periprosthetic fracture management with modular tapered fluted stems (MTFS) is limited by lack of patient-reported outcomes, small samples, and unseparated inclusion of multiple implant models. This study examines the outcomes of Vancouver B2 and B3 fractures treated with a single MTFS hip system, the Zimmer Modular Revision (ZMR), with a minimum 1-year follow-up.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of all patients who received a femoral revision with a ZMR taper stem to treat a Vancouver B2 or B3 fracture at our centre between 2006 and 2020. The primary outcome was all-cause reoperation, with secondary outcomes including the Harris Hip Score (HHS), the Oxford Hip Score (OHS), stem subsidence, and mortality.

Results: We included 44 patients (mean age 71.6 yr) in the final analysis, with a mean follow-up of 50.2 months. The all-cause reoperation rate was 11.9% (n = 5). Although there were 3 cases (7.1%) of stem subsidence, there were no cases in which stem revision was required. The mean HHS was 77.2 (standard deviation [SD] 10.6, range 47 to 91) and the mean OHS was 42.5 (SD 5.2, range 33 to 48).

Conclusion: Management of Vancouver B2 and B3 periprosthetic femur fractures with the ZMR MFTS option resulted in an acceptable complication profile and good functional outcome with a minimum 1-year follow-up.

Abstract Image

模块化锥形槽型钛柄翻修关节置换术治疗Vancouver B2和B3型假体周围股骨骨折的临床效果
背景:现有关于温哥华B2和B3假体周围骨折采用模块化锥形槽茎(MTFS)治疗的文献由于缺乏患者报告的结果、样本小以及未分离纳入多个假体模型而受到限制。本研究考察了使用单一MTFS髋关节系统Zimmer模块化翻修(ZMR)治疗Vancouver B2和B3骨折的结果,并进行了至少1年的随访。方法:我们对2006年至2020年间在我们中心接受ZMR锥形柄股骨翻修治疗温哥华B2或B3骨折的所有患者进行了回顾性分析。主要结果为全因再手术,次要结果包括Harris髋关节评分(HHS)、Oxford髋关节评分(OHS)、髋关节下沉和死亡率。结果:最终分析纳入44例患者,平均年龄71.6岁,平均随访50.2个月。全因再手术率为11.9% (n = 5)。虽然有3例(7.1%)的阀杆下沉,但没有需要修改阀杆的情况。平均HHS为77.2(标准差[SD] 10.6,范围47 ~ 91),平均OHS为42.5(标准差[SD] 5.2,范围33 ~ 48)。结论:在至少1年的随访中,使用ZMR MFTS治疗Vancouver B2和B3型假体周围股骨骨折可获得可接受的并发症和良好的功能结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
8.00%
发文量
120
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The mission of CJS is to contribute to the meaningful continuing medical education of Canadian surgical specialists, and to provide surgeons with an effective vehicle for the dissemination of observations in the areas of clinical and basic science research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书