Intradiscal mesenchymal stem cell therapy for degenerative disc disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials.

IF 2.7 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Asian Spine Journal Pub Date : 2026-06-01 Epub Date: 2026-03-17 DOI:10.31616/asj.2025.0354
Ahmad Jabir Rahyussalim, Satria Wisnu Murti, Rudi Thenggono, Faiza Al Khalifa Calista
{"title":"Intradiscal mesenchymal stem cell therapy for degenerative disc disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials.","authors":"Ahmad Jabir Rahyussalim, Satria Wisnu Murti, Rudi Thenggono, Faiza Al Khalifa Calista","doi":"10.31616/asj.2025.0354","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Systematic review and meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To investigate the efficacy and safety of intradiscal mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) injection for patients with degenerative disc disease (DDD).</p><p><strong>Overview of literature: </strong>DDD is a common cause of chronic low-back pain (CLBP). Studies have shown that MSC therapy may have the potential to reverse the degenerative process. However, the evidence remains inconclusive.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive search of Europe PMC, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and Medline was conducted up to April 30, 2025, using relevant keywords. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing intradiscal MSC injections with sham/placebo in patients with DDD were included. Random-effects models were used to calculate the odds ratios and mean differences (MDs).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seven RCTs were included. MSC injection was associated with significantly greater reductions in Visual Analog Scale pain scores (MD, 6.67; 95% confidence interval [CI], -9.31 to -4.02; p<0.00001, I2=29%) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) (MD, -4.05%; 95% CI, -5.24 to -2.87; p<0.00001, I2=32%) compared with sham/placebo. The magnitude of improvement increased with longer followup. No significant differences were observed between groups in treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs), serious AEs, treatment discontinuation due to AEs, or mortality.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Intradiscal MSC injection appears to be a safe and effective therapy, offering modest improvements in pain and function for patients with CLBP due to DDD who do not respond to conservative treatments.</p>","PeriodicalId":8555,"journal":{"name":"Asian Spine Journal","volume":" ","pages":"541-557"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13329240/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Spine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31616/asj.2025.0354","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Study design: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Purpose: To investigate the efficacy and safety of intradiscal mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) injection for patients with degenerative disc disease (DDD).

Overview of literature: DDD is a common cause of chronic low-back pain (CLBP). Studies have shown that MSC therapy may have the potential to reverse the degenerative process. However, the evidence remains inconclusive.

Methods: A comprehensive search of Europe PMC, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and Medline was conducted up to April 30, 2025, using relevant keywords. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing intradiscal MSC injections with sham/placebo in patients with DDD were included. Random-effects models were used to calculate the odds ratios and mean differences (MDs).

Results: Seven RCTs were included. MSC injection was associated with significantly greater reductions in Visual Analog Scale pain scores (MD, 6.67; 95% confidence interval [CI], -9.31 to -4.02; p<0.00001, I2=29%) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) (MD, -4.05%; 95% CI, -5.24 to -2.87; p<0.00001, I2=32%) compared with sham/placebo. The magnitude of improvement increased with longer followup. No significant differences were observed between groups in treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs), serious AEs, treatment discontinuation due to AEs, or mortality.

Conclusions: Intradiscal MSC injection appears to be a safe and effective therapy, offering modest improvements in pain and function for patients with CLBP due to DDD who do not respond to conservative treatments.

椎间盘内间充质干细胞治疗退行性椎间盘疾病:随机试验的系统回顾和荟萃分析。
研究设计:系统评价和荟萃分析。目的:探讨椎间盘内充质干细胞(MSC)注射治疗退行性椎间盘病变(DDD)的疗效和安全性。文献综述:DDD是慢性腰痛(CLBP)的常见原因。研究表明MSC治疗可能有逆转退行性过程的潜力。然而,证据仍然没有定论。方法:综合检索截止2025年4月30日的欧洲PMC、Cochrane Library、Scopus和Medline数据库,并使用相关关键词进行检索。随机对照试验(rct)比较椎间盘内骨髓间充质干细胞注射与假/安慰剂治疗DDD患者。随机效应模型用于计算优势比和平均差异(MDs)。结果:纳入7项rct。骨髓间充质干细胞注射与视觉模拟量表疼痛评分的显著降低相关(MD, 6.67; 95%可信区间[CI], -9.31至-4.02)结论:椎间盘内骨髓间充质干细胞注射似乎是一种安全有效的治疗方法,对于保守治疗无效的DDD所致CLBP患者的疼痛和功能有适度改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Asian Spine Journal
Asian Spine Journal ORTHOPEDICS-
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
4.30%
发文量
108
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书