A caster-up test method for manual wheelchairs under worst-case conditions.

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
Takashi Handa, Masahiro Sakamoto, Kunihiro Tochiki, Yoshihiko Kozai
{"title":"A caster-up test method for manual wheelchairs under worst-case conditions.","authors":"Takashi Handa, Masahiro Sakamoto, Kunihiro Tochiki, Yoshihiko Kozai","doi":"10.1080/10400435.2026.2642119","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study validated the caster-up durability test specified in ISO 7176-30, originally developed to ensure the structural safety of wheelchairs designed for changing occupant posture. As caregiver-assisted caster-up maneuvers are common in standard manual wheelchairs, particularly in aging societies, the study examined the applicability of this test to such wheelchairs. A worst-case scenario, involving a downward vertical force applied to the push handles, was defined. A custom test apparatus capable of simulating both the ISO-defined method and the worst-case method was developed. Mechanical stress on the wheelchair frame was quantified using strain gauges. Results showed that the worst-case method induced approximately 1.3 times greater strain at specific locations on the back support pipe compared to the existing method, indicating a potential underestimation of stress in the current ISO test. Durability tests conducted on four commercial wheelchair models found that two passed and two failed under the worst-case method. While the test method itself appears generally valid, the criterion for allowable readjustments requires reconsideration. These findings suggest that incorporating the worst-case method into durability testing could enhance user safety, supporting reconsideration of certain ISO 7176-30 requirements.</p>","PeriodicalId":51568,"journal":{"name":"Assistive Technology","volume":" ","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Assistive Technology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10400435.2026.2642119","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study validated the caster-up durability test specified in ISO 7176-30, originally developed to ensure the structural safety of wheelchairs designed for changing occupant posture. As caregiver-assisted caster-up maneuvers are common in standard manual wheelchairs, particularly in aging societies, the study examined the applicability of this test to such wheelchairs. A worst-case scenario, involving a downward vertical force applied to the push handles, was defined. A custom test apparatus capable of simulating both the ISO-defined method and the worst-case method was developed. Mechanical stress on the wheelchair frame was quantified using strain gauges. Results showed that the worst-case method induced approximately 1.3 times greater strain at specific locations on the back support pipe compared to the existing method, indicating a potential underestimation of stress in the current ISO test. Durability tests conducted on four commercial wheelchair models found that two passed and two failed under the worst-case method. While the test method itself appears generally valid, the criterion for allowable readjustments requires reconsideration. These findings suggest that incorporating the worst-case method into durability testing could enhance user safety, supporting reconsideration of certain ISO 7176-30 requirements.

一种最坏情况下手动轮椅的滚轮试验方法。
本研究验证了ISO 7176-30中规定的脚轮耐久性测试,该测试最初是为了确保设计用于改变乘员姿势的轮椅的结构安全性而开发的。由于护理人员辅助的脚轮动作在标准手动轮椅中很常见,特别是在老龄化社会中,因此该研究检验了该测试对此类轮椅的适用性。最坏的情况是,推手柄受到垂直向下的作用力。开发了一种能够模拟iso定义方法和最坏情况方法的自定义测试装置。用应变片对轮椅框架的机械应力进行量化。结果表明,与现有方法相比,最坏情况方法在后支撑管的特定位置产生的应变约为1.3倍,这表明当前ISO测试中可能低估了应力。对4个商用轮椅模型进行了耐久性试验,结果发现,在最坏情况下,2个通过,2个不通过。虽然测试方法本身似乎普遍有效,但允许调整的标准需要重新考虑。这些发现表明,将最坏情况方法纳入耐久性测试可以提高用户安全性,支持重新考虑某些ISO 7176-30要求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Assistive Technology
Assistive Technology REHABILITATION-
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
5.60%
发文量
40
期刊介绍: Assistive Technology is an applied, scientific publication in the multi-disciplinary field of technology for people with disabilities. The journal"s purpose is to foster communication among individuals working in all aspects of the assistive technology arena including researchers, developers, clinicians, educators and consumers. The journal will consider papers from all assistive technology applications. Only original papers will be accepted. Technical notes describing preliminary techniques, procedures, or findings of original scientific research may also be submitted. Letters to the Editor are welcome. Books for review may be sent to authors or publisher.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书