ECG characteristics as indicators of the aetiology of pulseless electrical activity: a systematic review.

Brad Gander, Samantha Laws
{"title":"ECG characteristics as indicators of the aetiology of pulseless electrical activity: a systematic review.","authors":"Brad Gander, Samantha Laws","doi":"10.29045/14784726.2025.3.9.4.27","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The incidence of pulseless electrical activity (PEA) as a presenting rhythm in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest is rising in comparison with other rhythms. Prompt recognition of the cause of PEA can improve outcomes. The assessment of electrocardiogram (ECG) characteristics during resuscitation has been suggested as a source of diagnostic information for clinicians. The aim of this systematic review was to identify literature evaluating the use of ECG characteristics as indicators of the aetiology of PEA and to consider how their findings may be utilised in clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Case series, observational studies, randomised controlled trials and empirical research investigating the ECG characteristics of adult patients and reporting the aetiology of PEA were searched for via a systematic literature search of the MEDLINE, CINAHL Plus and EMBASE databases. Searches for grey literature were performed, as well as reference screening. A risk-of-bias assessment was undertaken for each included study.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of four articles were selected for final inclusion. One study reported a statistically significant correlation between the presence of wide QRS complexes and hyperkalaemia. No further associations between ECG characteristics and the aetiology of cardiac arrest were reported. Three studies were found to be at moderate risk of bias due to incomplete inclusion of patients. Studies often assessed groups of aetiologies, rather than specific causes. Consequently, this limits their application in clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ECG characteristics should not be used in isolation as an indicator of the aetiology of cardiac arrest in patients with PEA. The included studies often employed broad categorisations of aetiologies, limiting their ability to identify specific characteristics associated with individual causes. Future research should include analysis of specific aetiologies and the evaluation of ECG characteristics to augment other diagnostic tools.</p>","PeriodicalId":72470,"journal":{"name":"British paramedic journal","volume":"9 4","pages":"27-36"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12981530/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British paramedic journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29045/14784726.2025.3.9.4.27","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The incidence of pulseless electrical activity (PEA) as a presenting rhythm in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest is rising in comparison with other rhythms. Prompt recognition of the cause of PEA can improve outcomes. The assessment of electrocardiogram (ECG) characteristics during resuscitation has been suggested as a source of diagnostic information for clinicians. The aim of this systematic review was to identify literature evaluating the use of ECG characteristics as indicators of the aetiology of PEA and to consider how their findings may be utilised in clinical practice.

Methods: Case series, observational studies, randomised controlled trials and empirical research investigating the ECG characteristics of adult patients and reporting the aetiology of PEA were searched for via a systematic literature search of the MEDLINE, CINAHL Plus and EMBASE databases. Searches for grey literature were performed, as well as reference screening. A risk-of-bias assessment was undertaken for each included study.

Results: A total of four articles were selected for final inclusion. One study reported a statistically significant correlation between the presence of wide QRS complexes and hyperkalaemia. No further associations between ECG characteristics and the aetiology of cardiac arrest were reported. Three studies were found to be at moderate risk of bias due to incomplete inclusion of patients. Studies often assessed groups of aetiologies, rather than specific causes. Consequently, this limits their application in clinical practice.

Conclusion: ECG characteristics should not be used in isolation as an indicator of the aetiology of cardiac arrest in patients with PEA. The included studies often employed broad categorisations of aetiologies, limiting their ability to identify specific characteristics associated with individual causes. Future research should include analysis of specific aetiologies and the evaluation of ECG characteristics to augment other diagnostic tools.

Abstract Image

心电图特征作为无脉电活动病因学指标:系统综述。
无脉性电活动(PEA)作为院外心脏骤停的一种表现节律的发生率与其他节律相比正在上升。及时认识到PEA的病因可以改善预后。复苏期间的心电图(ECG)特征评估已被建议作为临床医生诊断信息的来源。本系统综述的目的是找出评价心电图特征作为PEA病因指标的文献,并考虑如何将其发现应用于临床实践。方法:通过MEDLINE、CINAHL Plus和EMBASE数据库的系统文献检索,对调查成人患者ECG特征和报告PEA病因的病例系列、观察性研究、随机对照试验和实证研究进行检索。进行灰色文献检索和参考文献筛选。对每一项纳入的研究进行了偏倚风险评估。结果:共有4篇文章被最终纳入。一项研究报告了宽QRS复合物的存在与高钾血症之间具有统计学意义的相关性。没有进一步的心电图特征和心脏骤停病因之间的关联报道。有三项研究由于纳入的患者不完整而存在中等偏倚风险。研究通常评估不同的病因,而不是特定的病因。因此,这限制了它们在临床实践中的应用。结论:心电图特征不应单独作为PEA患者心脏骤停的病因指标。纳入的研究通常采用广泛的病因分类,限制了它们识别与个体原因相关的特定特征的能力。未来的研究应包括具体病因的分析和心电图特征的评估,以增加其他诊断工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书