From Design to Implementation: NursingUP® Board Game for Positive Nursing Practice Environments.

IF 2.8 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING
Soraia Cristina de Abreu Pereira, Cintia Silva Fassarella, Olga Maria Pimenta Lopes Ribeiro
{"title":"From Design to Implementation: NursingUP® Board Game for Positive Nursing Practice Environments.","authors":"Soraia Cristina de Abreu Pereira, Cintia Silva Fassarella, Olga Maria Pimenta Lopes Ribeiro","doi":"10.1002/nur.70069","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Positive nursing practice environments are fundamental to patient safety, care quality, and nurses' well-being. However, few structured and evidence-based interventions have been developed to actively strengthen these environments and foster collaboration among nursing teams. This study describes the systematic development, validation, implementation, and preliminary evaluation of NursingUP®, an innovative board game designed to stimulate reflection on positive nursing practice environments. A multi-method, multi-phase design guided the study. The development phase integrated theoretical and empirical evidence on healthy work environments to define the game's objectives and structure. Content validity was established through a structured e-Delphi process involving 17 nursing experts who evaluated clarity, relevance, and representativeness of the game's content and mechanics. Implementation was conducted with 48 primary health care nurses, followed by evaluation using standardized satisfaction and usability instruments and two open-ended qualitative questions on usefulness and improvement suggestions. Experts reached consensus regarding the clarity, relevance, and pertinence of the game's content and mechanics. Nurses reported high satisfaction, and perceived the game as useful for stimulating reflection on practice environment determinants, improving communication, and strengthening teamwork. Usability assessment demonstrated strong acceptance, with clear rules and ease of use being particularly valued. NursingUP® demonstrated content validity, high user satisfaction, and good usability, establishing feasibility as a potential educational tool for nursing teams. Future studies should test its impact on behavioral and organizational outcomes using controlled designs.</p>","PeriodicalId":54492,"journal":{"name":"Research in Nursing & Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Nursing & Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.70069","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Positive nursing practice environments are fundamental to patient safety, care quality, and nurses' well-being. However, few structured and evidence-based interventions have been developed to actively strengthen these environments and foster collaboration among nursing teams. This study describes the systematic development, validation, implementation, and preliminary evaluation of NursingUP®, an innovative board game designed to stimulate reflection on positive nursing practice environments. A multi-method, multi-phase design guided the study. The development phase integrated theoretical and empirical evidence on healthy work environments to define the game's objectives and structure. Content validity was established through a structured e-Delphi process involving 17 nursing experts who evaluated clarity, relevance, and representativeness of the game's content and mechanics. Implementation was conducted with 48 primary health care nurses, followed by evaluation using standardized satisfaction and usability instruments and two open-ended qualitative questions on usefulness and improvement suggestions. Experts reached consensus regarding the clarity, relevance, and pertinence of the game's content and mechanics. Nurses reported high satisfaction, and perceived the game as useful for stimulating reflection on practice environment determinants, improving communication, and strengthening teamwork. Usability assessment demonstrated strong acceptance, with clear rules and ease of use being particularly valued. NursingUP® demonstrated content validity, high user satisfaction, and good usability, establishing feasibility as a potential educational tool for nursing teams. Future studies should test its impact on behavioral and organizational outcomes using controlled designs.

从设计到实施:NursingUP®棋盘游戏为积极的护理实践环境。
积极的护理实践环境是患者安全、护理质量和护士福祉的基础。然而,很少有结构化和基于证据的干预措施被开发出来,以积极加强这些环境并促进护理团队之间的合作。本研究描述了NursingUP®的系统开发、验证、实施和初步评估,NursingUP®是一款创新的棋盘游戏,旨在激发对积极护理实践环境的反思。采用多方法、多阶段设计指导研究。开发阶段整合了关于健康工作环境的理论和经验证据,以确定游戏的目标和结构。内容有效性是通过结构化的e-Delphi过程建立的,17名护理专家评估了游戏内容和机制的清晰度、相关性和代表性。对48名初级保健护士进行了实施,随后使用标准化满意度和可用性工具进行了评估,并提出了关于有用性和改进建议的两个开放式定性问题。专家们就游戏内容和机制的清晰度、相关性和针对性达成了共识。护士报告了很高的满意度,并认为游戏有助于激发对实践环境决定因素的反思,改善沟通,加强团队合作。可用性评估表现出强烈的接受度,明确的规则和易用性尤其受到重视。NursingUP®的内容效度高,用户满意度高,可用性好,作为护理团队潜在的教育工具具有可行性。未来的研究应该使用控制设计来测试其对行为和组织结果的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
73
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Research in Nursing & Health ( RINAH ) is a peer-reviewed general research journal devoted to publication of a wide range of research that will inform the practice of nursing and other health disciplines. The editors invite reports of research describing problems and testing interventions related to health phenomena, health care and self-care, clinical organization and administration; and the testing of research findings in practice. Research protocols are considered if funded in a peer-reviewed process by an agency external to the authors’ home institution and if the work is in progress. Papers on research methods and techniques are appropriate if they go beyond what is already generally available in the literature and include description of successful use of the method. Theory papers are accepted if each proposition is supported by research evidence. Systematic reviews of the literature are reviewed if PRISMA guidelines are followed. Letters to the editor commenting on published articles are welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书