Extended-Release vs Sublingual Buprenorphine in Pregnancy Through 12 Months Post Partum: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

IF 23.3 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
T John Winhusen, Michelle R Lofwall, Frankie Kropp, Daniel Lewis, Marcela C Smid, Jessica L Young, Candace Hodgkins, Elizabeth E Krans, Zachary Hansen, Elisha M Wachman, Davida M Schiff, Constance Guille, Vania Rudolf, Tara Chowdhury, Lawrence Leeman, Mitra Lewis, Abigail G Matthews, Gerald Cochran, Jacquie King, Christine Wilder, Carmen Rosa
{"title":"Extended-Release vs Sublingual Buprenorphine in Pregnancy Through 12 Months Post Partum: A Randomized Clinical Trial.","authors":"T John Winhusen, Michelle R Lofwall, Frankie Kropp, Daniel Lewis, Marcela C Smid, Jessica L Young, Candace Hodgkins, Elizabeth E Krans, Zachary Hansen, Elisha M Wachman, Davida M Schiff, Constance Guille, Vania Rudolf, Tara Chowdhury, Lawrence Leeman, Mitra Lewis, Abigail G Matthews, Gerald Cochran, Jacquie King, Christine Wilder, Carmen Rosa","doi":"10.1001/jamainternmed.2026.0057","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Treating opioid use disorder (OUD) in pregnancy with sublingual buprenorphine is an evidence-based practice, but it has disadvantages that could be addressed with an extended-release formulation.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of extended-release buprenorphine vs sublingual buprenorphine for OUD in pregnancy through 12 months post partum.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>This 2-group, open-label, noninferiority, randomized clinical trial was conducted between July 2, 2020, and October 30, 2024, among adults with OUD and a singleton pregnancy of 6 to 30 weeks' gestational age at 13 outpatient cross-disciplinary peripartum OUD treatment sites.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Randomization to sublingual or extended-release buprenorphine (weekly formulation during pregnancy, monthly formulation optional post partum if not breastfeeding).</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>The primary and key secondary outcomes were illicit opioid abstinence during pregnancy and the postpartum period, respectively, defined as the proportion of weekly collected urine samples negative for illicit opioids. If noninferiority was demonstrated at a margin of 0.15, testing for superiority was planned. Key secondary infant outcomes from medical records were opioid treatment for neonatal opioid withdrawal syndrome (NOWS; yes or no) and number of opioid treatment days for NOWS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 140 randomized participants, the mean (SD) age was 31.2 (4.6) years. There were 10 Black participants (7.1%), 10 Hispanic participants (7.1%), 116 (82.9%) White participants, and 14 participants (10.0%) who belonged to additional groups. All but 2 were already prescribed sublingual buprenorphine. Study completion was 98% through pregnancy (137 participants) and 81% through 12 months post partum (114 participants). Illicit opioid abstinence was higher during pregnancy for participants receiving extended-release vs sublingual buprenorphine (82.5% vs 72.6%; mean difference, 9.84 [95% CI, 1.72 to 17.95] percentage points; P = .009). Postpartum abstinence rates declined and were similar in both groups (60.2% vs 59.5%; mean difference, 0.65 [98% CI, -12.72 to 14.02] percentage points; P = .45). Those receiving extended-release buprenorphine experienced fewer serious adverse events during pregnancy (8.7% vs 26.8%; P = .007) and post partum (6.0% vs 18.6%; P = .04). Nonserious adverse events rates did not differ between groups, but more were deemed medication-related for extended-release participants during pregnancy (26.1% vs 7.0%; P = .003). Infants exposed to extended-release vs sublingual buprenorphine did not differ in need for opioid treatment (30.2% vs 26.5%; relative risk, 1.14 [98% CI, 0.54 to 1.99]; P = .64) or mean (SE) treatment days (10.9 [2.2] vs 14.8 [3.0] days; relative risk, 0.73 [98% CI, 0.36 to 1.51]; P = .28). At birth, extended-release-exposed neonates had larger mean (SE) head circumferences than those exposed to sublingual buprenorphine (34.0 [0.2] vs 33.4 [0.2] cm; mean difference, 0.63 [95% CI, -0.00 to 1.26] cm; P = .049).</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>The findings of this randomized clinical trial support weekly extended-release buprenorphine for OUD treatment during pregnancy.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03918850.</p>","PeriodicalId":14714,"journal":{"name":"JAMA Internal Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"533-543"},"PeriodicalIF":23.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12993732/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMA Internal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2026.0057","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Importance: Treating opioid use disorder (OUD) in pregnancy with sublingual buprenorphine is an evidence-based practice, but it has disadvantages that could be addressed with an extended-release formulation.

Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of extended-release buprenorphine vs sublingual buprenorphine for OUD in pregnancy through 12 months post partum.

Design, setting, and participants: This 2-group, open-label, noninferiority, randomized clinical trial was conducted between July 2, 2020, and October 30, 2024, among adults with OUD and a singleton pregnancy of 6 to 30 weeks' gestational age at 13 outpatient cross-disciplinary peripartum OUD treatment sites.

Interventions: Randomization to sublingual or extended-release buprenorphine (weekly formulation during pregnancy, monthly formulation optional post partum if not breastfeeding).

Main outcomes and measures: The primary and key secondary outcomes were illicit opioid abstinence during pregnancy and the postpartum period, respectively, defined as the proportion of weekly collected urine samples negative for illicit opioids. If noninferiority was demonstrated at a margin of 0.15, testing for superiority was planned. Key secondary infant outcomes from medical records were opioid treatment for neonatal opioid withdrawal syndrome (NOWS; yes or no) and number of opioid treatment days for NOWS.

Results: Among 140 randomized participants, the mean (SD) age was 31.2 (4.6) years. There were 10 Black participants (7.1%), 10 Hispanic participants (7.1%), 116 (82.9%) White participants, and 14 participants (10.0%) who belonged to additional groups. All but 2 were already prescribed sublingual buprenorphine. Study completion was 98% through pregnancy (137 participants) and 81% through 12 months post partum (114 participants). Illicit opioid abstinence was higher during pregnancy for participants receiving extended-release vs sublingual buprenorphine (82.5% vs 72.6%; mean difference, 9.84 [95% CI, 1.72 to 17.95] percentage points; P = .009). Postpartum abstinence rates declined and were similar in both groups (60.2% vs 59.5%; mean difference, 0.65 [98% CI, -12.72 to 14.02] percentage points; P = .45). Those receiving extended-release buprenorphine experienced fewer serious adverse events during pregnancy (8.7% vs 26.8%; P = .007) and post partum (6.0% vs 18.6%; P = .04). Nonserious adverse events rates did not differ between groups, but more were deemed medication-related for extended-release participants during pregnancy (26.1% vs 7.0%; P = .003). Infants exposed to extended-release vs sublingual buprenorphine did not differ in need for opioid treatment (30.2% vs 26.5%; relative risk, 1.14 [98% CI, 0.54 to 1.99]; P = .64) or mean (SE) treatment days (10.9 [2.2] vs 14.8 [3.0] days; relative risk, 0.73 [98% CI, 0.36 to 1.51]; P = .28). At birth, extended-release-exposed neonates had larger mean (SE) head circumferences than those exposed to sublingual buprenorphine (34.0 [0.2] vs 33.4 [0.2] cm; mean difference, 0.63 [95% CI, -0.00 to 1.26] cm; P = .049).

Conclusions and relevance: The findings of this randomized clinical trial support weekly extended-release buprenorphine for OUD treatment during pregnancy.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03918850.

孕期至产后12个月丁丙诺啡缓释vs舌下丁丙诺啡:一项随机临床试验
重要性:丁丙诺啡舌下治疗妊娠阿片类药物使用障碍(OUD)是一种基于证据的做法,但它有一些缺点,可以通过缓释制剂来解决。目的:评价丁丙诺啡缓释与舌下丁丙诺啡治疗妊娠至产后12个月OUD的有效性和安全性。设计、环境和参与者:这项两组、开放标签、非劣效性、随机临床试验于2020年7月2日至2024年10月30日在13个门诊跨学科围产期OUD治疗点进行,受试者为6至30周孕周的成年OUD患者和单胎妊娠。干预措施:随机分配到舌下或缓释丁丙诺啡(怀孕期间每周配方,如果不是母乳喂养,产后可选择每月配方)。主要结局和措施:主要结局和关键次要结局分别是怀孕期间和产后期间非法阿片类药物戒断,定义为每周收集的尿液样本中非法阿片类药物阴性的比例。如果证明非劣效性的裕度为0.15,则计划进行劣效性检验。医疗记录中的关键次要婴儿结局是阿片类药物治疗新生儿阿片类戒断综合征(NOWS;是或否)和NOWS阿片类药物治疗天数。结果:在140名随机参与者中,平均(SD)年龄为31.2(4.6)岁。有10名黑人参与者(7.1%),10名西班牙裔参与者(7.1%),116名白人参与者(82.9%),14名属于其他群体的参与者(10.0%)。除两人外,所有人都已经开了舌下丁丙诺啡。怀孕期间(137名参与者)研究完成率为98%,产后12个月(114名参与者)研究完成率为81%。与舌下丁丙诺啡相比,接受缓释丁丙诺啡的参与者在怀孕期间非法阿片类药物戒断率更高(82.5% vs 72.6%;平均差异为9.84 [95% CI, 1.72至17.95]个百分点;P = 0.009)。两组产后戒断率均有所下降,且相似(60.2% vs 59.5%;平均差异0.65 [98% CI, -12.72 ~ 14.02]个百分点;P = 0.45)。接受丁丙诺啡缓释治疗的孕妇在妊娠期间发生的严重不良事件较少(8.7% vs 26.8%; P =。007)和产后(6.0% vs 18.6%; P = 0.04)。非严重不良事件发生率在两组之间没有差异,但在妊娠期延长释放参与者中,更多的不良事件被认为与药物有关(26.1% vs 7.0%; P = 0.003)。暴露于缓释丁丙诺啡与舌下丁丙诺啡的婴儿对阿片类药物治疗的需求没有差异(30.2% vs 26.5%;相对风险,1.14 [98% CI, 0.54至1.99];P =。64)或平均(SE)治疗天数(10.9 [2.2]vs 14.8[3.0]天;相对风险为0.73 [98% CI, 0.36至1.51];P = 0.28)。出生时,暴露于延长释放剂的新生儿比暴露于舌下丁丙诺啡的新生儿平均头围(SE)更大(34.0[0.2]对33.4 [0.2]cm;平均差异为0.63 [95% CI, -0.00至1.26]cm; P = 0.049)。结论和相关性:这项随机临床试验的结果支持每周缓释丁丙诺啡用于妊娠期OUD治疗。试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT03918850。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JAMA Internal Medicine
JAMA Internal Medicine MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
43.50
自引率
1.30%
发文量
371
期刊介绍: JAMA Internal Medicine is an international, peer-reviewed journal committed to advancing the field of internal medicine worldwide. With a focus on four core priorities—clinical relevance, clinical practice change, credibility, and effective communication—the journal aims to provide indispensable and trustworthy peer-reviewed evidence. Catering to academics, clinicians, educators, researchers, and trainees across the entire spectrum of internal medicine, including general internal medicine and subspecialties, JAMA Internal Medicine publishes innovative and clinically relevant research. The journal strives to deliver stimulating articles that educate and inform readers with the latest research findings, driving positive change in healthcare systems and patient care delivery. As a member of the JAMA Network, a consortium of peer-reviewed medical publications, JAMA Internal Medicine plays a pivotal role in shaping the discourse and advancing patient care in internal medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书