An analysis of attitudes toward gene therapy in people with severe hemophilia in Germany, a survey-based cross-sectional study.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 HEMATOLOGY
Therapeutic Advances in Hematology Pub Date : 2026-03-11 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.1177/20406207261428774
Svetlana Babayeva, Aida Peyvandi, Christian Schepperle, Günter Auerswald, Steffen Rauchfuss, Flora Peyvandi, Ilaria Cutica, Wolfgang Miesbach
{"title":"An analysis of attitudes toward gene therapy in people with severe hemophilia in Germany, a survey-based cross-sectional study.","authors":"Svetlana Babayeva, Aida Peyvandi, Christian Schepperle, Günter Auerswald, Steffen Rauchfuss, Flora Peyvandi, Ilaria Cutica, Wolfgang Miesbach","doi":"10.1177/20406207261428774","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Severe hemophilia traditionally requires lifelong prophylactic treatment, which cannot fully prevent joint damage and significantly impacts patients' quality of life. In recent years, gene therapy has been extensively researched as a potential cure with a single infusion, but it has not yet gained widespread acceptance.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study examines the knowledge and attitudes of people with severe hemophilia regarding gene therapy to provide guidance to practitioners in the context of shared decision-making.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Cross-sectional observational study based on a standardized questionnaire.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A questionnaire developed by Cutica, Ilaria et al. was evaluated in a self-reported, anonymized survey for a German cohort of 59 people with severe hemophilia. It covered sociodemographic and clinical characteristics, knowledge, attitudes, risk tolerance, and decision-making preferences.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 59 people with severe hemophilia A and 10 with severe hemophilia B, 59% expressed a predominantly rejective attitude toward gene therapy. Most had only general knowledge of gene therapy. Concerns about long-term side effects (e.g., cancer development) significantly contribute to a negative attitude toward gene therapy (<i>p</i> = 0.005). People with hemophilia and an annual bleeding rate ⩾1 show a significantly higher willingness to consider or accept gene therapy (<i>p</i> = 0.001). Rejection of gene therapy is significantly associated with high expectations regarding its duration of efficacy and the minimum clotting factor level.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Further studies are needed to refine educational concepts for people with hemophilia and clear out misconceptions about gene therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":23048,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Hematology","volume":"17 ","pages":"20406207261428774"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12979895/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic Advances in Hematology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20406207261428774","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Severe hemophilia traditionally requires lifelong prophylactic treatment, which cannot fully prevent joint damage and significantly impacts patients' quality of life. In recent years, gene therapy has been extensively researched as a potential cure with a single infusion, but it has not yet gained widespread acceptance.

Objectives: This study examines the knowledge and attitudes of people with severe hemophilia regarding gene therapy to provide guidance to practitioners in the context of shared decision-making.

Design: Cross-sectional observational study based on a standardized questionnaire.

Methods: A questionnaire developed by Cutica, Ilaria et al. was evaluated in a self-reported, anonymized survey for a German cohort of 59 people with severe hemophilia. It covered sociodemographic and clinical characteristics, knowledge, attitudes, risk tolerance, and decision-making preferences.

Results: Among 59 people with severe hemophilia A and 10 with severe hemophilia B, 59% expressed a predominantly rejective attitude toward gene therapy. Most had only general knowledge of gene therapy. Concerns about long-term side effects (e.g., cancer development) significantly contribute to a negative attitude toward gene therapy (p = 0.005). People with hemophilia and an annual bleeding rate ⩾1 show a significantly higher willingness to consider or accept gene therapy (p = 0.001). Rejection of gene therapy is significantly associated with high expectations regarding its duration of efficacy and the minimum clotting factor level.

Conclusion: Further studies are needed to refine educational concepts for people with hemophilia and clear out misconceptions about gene therapy.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

对德国严重血友病患者基因治疗态度的分析,一项基于调查的横断面研究。
背景:严重血友病传统上需要终生预防性治疗,不能完全预防关节损伤,严重影响患者的生活质量。近年来,基因疗法作为一种单次输注的潜在治疗方法被广泛研究,但尚未得到广泛接受。目的:本研究旨在了解重度血友病患者对基因治疗的认知和态度,为临床医生共同决策提供指导。设计:基于标准化问卷的横断面观察性研究。方法:由Cutica、Ilaria等人开发的问卷对德国59名严重血友病患者进行自我报告的匿名调查。它涵盖了社会人口学和临床特征、知识、态度、风险承受能力和决策偏好。结果:59例重度A型血友病患者和10例重度B型血友病患者中,59%的患者对基因治疗表现出明显的排斥态度。大多数人对基因治疗只有一般的了解。对长期副作用(如癌症发展)的担忧显著导致对基因治疗持消极态度(p = 0.005)。血友病患者和年出血率大于或等于1的人明显更愿意考虑或接受基因治疗(p = 0.001)。基因治疗的排斥反应与对其疗效持续时间和最低凝血因子水平的高期望显著相关。结论:完善血友病患者的教育理念,消除对基因治疗的误解,需要进一步的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
54
审稿时长
7 weeks
期刊介绍: Therapeutic Advances in Hematology delivers the highest quality peer-reviewed articles, reviews, and scholarly comment on pioneering efforts and innovative studies across all areas of hematology. The journal has a strong clinical and pharmacological focus and is aimed at clinicians and researchers in hematology, providing a forum in print and online for publishing the highest quality articles in this area.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书