Svetlana Babayeva, Aida Peyvandi, Christian Schepperle, Günter Auerswald, Steffen Rauchfuss, Flora Peyvandi, Ilaria Cutica, Wolfgang Miesbach
{"title":"An analysis of attitudes toward gene therapy in people with severe hemophilia in Germany, a survey-based cross-sectional study.","authors":"Svetlana Babayeva, Aida Peyvandi, Christian Schepperle, Günter Auerswald, Steffen Rauchfuss, Flora Peyvandi, Ilaria Cutica, Wolfgang Miesbach","doi":"10.1177/20406207261428774","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Severe hemophilia traditionally requires lifelong prophylactic treatment, which cannot fully prevent joint damage and significantly impacts patients' quality of life. In recent years, gene therapy has been extensively researched as a potential cure with a single infusion, but it has not yet gained widespread acceptance.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study examines the knowledge and attitudes of people with severe hemophilia regarding gene therapy to provide guidance to practitioners in the context of shared decision-making.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Cross-sectional observational study based on a standardized questionnaire.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A questionnaire developed by Cutica, Ilaria et al. was evaluated in a self-reported, anonymized survey for a German cohort of 59 people with severe hemophilia. It covered sociodemographic and clinical characteristics, knowledge, attitudes, risk tolerance, and decision-making preferences.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 59 people with severe hemophilia A and 10 with severe hemophilia B, 59% expressed a predominantly rejective attitude toward gene therapy. Most had only general knowledge of gene therapy. Concerns about long-term side effects (e.g., cancer development) significantly contribute to a negative attitude toward gene therapy (<i>p</i> = 0.005). People with hemophilia and an annual bleeding rate ⩾1 show a significantly higher willingness to consider or accept gene therapy (<i>p</i> = 0.001). Rejection of gene therapy is significantly associated with high expectations regarding its duration of efficacy and the minimum clotting factor level.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Further studies are needed to refine educational concepts for people with hemophilia and clear out misconceptions about gene therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":23048,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Hematology","volume":"17 ","pages":"20406207261428774"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12979895/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic Advances in Hematology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20406207261428774","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Severe hemophilia traditionally requires lifelong prophylactic treatment, which cannot fully prevent joint damage and significantly impacts patients' quality of life. In recent years, gene therapy has been extensively researched as a potential cure with a single infusion, but it has not yet gained widespread acceptance.
Objectives: This study examines the knowledge and attitudes of people with severe hemophilia regarding gene therapy to provide guidance to practitioners in the context of shared decision-making.
Design: Cross-sectional observational study based on a standardized questionnaire.
Methods: A questionnaire developed by Cutica, Ilaria et al. was evaluated in a self-reported, anonymized survey for a German cohort of 59 people with severe hemophilia. It covered sociodemographic and clinical characteristics, knowledge, attitudes, risk tolerance, and decision-making preferences.
Results: Among 59 people with severe hemophilia A and 10 with severe hemophilia B, 59% expressed a predominantly rejective attitude toward gene therapy. Most had only general knowledge of gene therapy. Concerns about long-term side effects (e.g., cancer development) significantly contribute to a negative attitude toward gene therapy (p = 0.005). People with hemophilia and an annual bleeding rate ⩾1 show a significantly higher willingness to consider or accept gene therapy (p = 0.001). Rejection of gene therapy is significantly associated with high expectations regarding its duration of efficacy and the minimum clotting factor level.
Conclusion: Further studies are needed to refine educational concepts for people with hemophilia and clear out misconceptions about gene therapy.
期刊介绍:
Therapeutic Advances in Hematology delivers the highest quality peer-reviewed articles, reviews, and scholarly comment on pioneering efforts and innovative studies across all areas of hematology. The journal has a strong clinical and pharmacological focus and is aimed at clinicians and researchers in hematology, providing a forum in print and online for publishing the highest quality articles in this area.