Impact of process parameters on IgG glycosylation in CHO systems: a comprehensive quantitative analysis.

IF 7.9 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
mAbs Pub Date : 2026-12-31 Epub Date: 2026-03-15 DOI:10.1080/19420862.2026.2643039
Javier Bravo-Venegas, Jose Rodriguez-Siza, Mauricio Vergara, Mauro Torres, Alan Dickson, Jorge R Toledo, María Carmen Molina, Marcela A Hermoso, Julio Berríos, Claudia Altamirano
{"title":"Impact of process parameters on IgG glycosylation in CHO systems: a comprehensive quantitative analysis.","authors":"Javier Bravo-Venegas, Jose Rodriguez-Siza, Mauricio Vergara, Mauro Torres, Alan Dickson, Jorge R Toledo, María Carmen Molina, Marcela A Hermoso, Julio Berríos, Claudia Altamirano","doi":"10.1080/19420862.2026.2643039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Controlling glycosylation, a critical quality attribute of biopharmaceuticals such as monoclonal antibodies, is essential, as it significantly influences biological activity and therapeutic efficacy. Although numerous studies have examined the impact of process parameters (PP, e.g. temperature, pH, dissolved oxygen) on glycosylation, the lack of standardized reporting makes cross-study comparisons challenging and prevents clear conclusions. Here, we systematically reviewed the literature and applied a normalized quantitative framework, the Glycan Indices approach, as a standardized quantitative criterion to evaluate the impact of process parameters on glycoform distribution in IgG-producing CHO cell systems objectively. This methodology enabled the integration and reinterpretation of large, heterogeneous datasets, validating some well-known patterns while providing novel perspectives about process parameters. Our analysis revealed that PP manipulations of pH, dissolved oxygen or CO<sub>2</sub> partial pressure rarely resulted in meaningful shifts in glycosylation, with changes <5% observed for galactose, fucose, or N-acetylneuraminic acid content. In contrast, for several cases temperature and osmolality changes notably affected galactosylation (>10%) and fucosylation (1-10%), variations that may have significant biological consequences. To our knowledge, this is the first comprehensive quantitative assessment of process parameters effects on glycosylation, showing that such influences are consistently limited, independent of CHO cell line or culture mode. Based in our observations we strongly recommend reporting both glycan distribution and glycan indices when performing glycan analysis. Dual reporting facilitates inter-study comparisons and prevents subtle shifts in sugar moieties from being masked by glycan redistribution.</p>","PeriodicalId":18206,"journal":{"name":"mAbs","volume":"18 1","pages":"2643039"},"PeriodicalIF":7.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12990948/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"mAbs","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19420862.2026.2643039","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Controlling glycosylation, a critical quality attribute of biopharmaceuticals such as monoclonal antibodies, is essential, as it significantly influences biological activity and therapeutic efficacy. Although numerous studies have examined the impact of process parameters (PP, e.g. temperature, pH, dissolved oxygen) on glycosylation, the lack of standardized reporting makes cross-study comparisons challenging and prevents clear conclusions. Here, we systematically reviewed the literature and applied a normalized quantitative framework, the Glycan Indices approach, as a standardized quantitative criterion to evaluate the impact of process parameters on glycoform distribution in IgG-producing CHO cell systems objectively. This methodology enabled the integration and reinterpretation of large, heterogeneous datasets, validating some well-known patterns while providing novel perspectives about process parameters. Our analysis revealed that PP manipulations of pH, dissolved oxygen or CO2 partial pressure rarely resulted in meaningful shifts in glycosylation, with changes <5% observed for galactose, fucose, or N-acetylneuraminic acid content. In contrast, for several cases temperature and osmolality changes notably affected galactosylation (>10%) and fucosylation (1-10%), variations that may have significant biological consequences. To our knowledge, this is the first comprehensive quantitative assessment of process parameters effects on glycosylation, showing that such influences are consistently limited, independent of CHO cell line or culture mode. Based in our observations we strongly recommend reporting both glycan distribution and glycan indices when performing glycan analysis. Dual reporting facilitates inter-study comparisons and prevents subtle shifts in sugar moieties from being masked by glycan redistribution.

工艺参数对CHO系统中IgG糖基化的影响:一项全面的定量分析。
控制糖基化是单克隆抗体等生物制药的关键质量属性,因为它显著影响生物活性和治疗效果,因此至关重要。尽管许多研究已经检查了工艺参数(PP,如温度、pH、溶解氧)对糖基化的影响,但缺乏标准化的报告使得交叉研究比较具有挑战性,并且无法得出明确的结论。在这里,我们系统地回顾了文献,并应用了规范化的定量框架,即聚糖指数方法,作为标准化的定量标准,客观地评估工艺参数对产生igg的CHO细胞系统中糖形分布的影响。这种方法能够集成和重新解释大型异构数据集,验证一些众所周知的模式,同时提供有关过程参数的新视角。我们的分析表明,PP对pH、溶解氧或CO2分压的操纵很少会导致糖基化的显著变化(变化10%)和聚焦化(1-10%),这些变化可能具有显著的生物学后果。据我们所知,这是第一次对工艺参数对糖基化影响的全面定量评估,表明这种影响始终是有限的,与CHO细胞系或培养模式无关。根据我们的观察,我们强烈建议在进行聚糖分析时报告聚糖分布和聚糖指数。双重报告促进了研究间的比较,并防止糖部分的细微变化被聚糖再分配所掩盖。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
mAbs
mAbs 工程技术-仪器仪表
CiteScore
10.70
自引率
11.30%
发文量
77
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: mAbs is a multi-disciplinary journal dedicated to the art and science of antibody research and development. The journal has a strong scientific and medical focus, but also strives to serve a broader readership. The articles are thus of interest to scientists, clinical researchers, and physicians, as well as the wider mAb community, including our readers involved in technology transfer, legal issues, investment, strategic planning and the regulation of therapeutics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书